Advance Search

Finanzas corporativas y sostenibilidad: un análisis bibliométrico e identificación de tendencias

Pedro Duque | Biografía
Universidad Católica Luis Amigó
Damiand Trejos | Biografía
Universidad de Caldas
Oscar Hoyos | Biografía
Universidad de Caldas
Juan Carlos Chica Mesa | Biografía
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Palabras clave:
Copyright and Licensing:

Derechos de autor 2021 Semestre Económico

Creative Commons License
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.

Resumen

El rápido deterioro ambiental, la creciente desigualdad social y las frecuentes crisis económicas, han hecho que la sociedad y en especial las empresas, cambien sus comportamientos y se vuelvan cada vez más conscientes de su papel en la temática de sostenibilidad, todo esto, sin dejar de lado sus intereses económicos. Debido al mcreciente interés académico y profesional sobre estos temas, esta investigación pretende realizar una revisión de literatura basada en mapeo científico, sobre el vínculo entre finanzas corporativas y sostenibilidad. Para ello, se realizó una búsqueda de la producción científica registrada en WoS y Scopus en las dos últimas décadas, posteriormente, con herramientas bibliométricas y análisis de red, se expone la estructura actual de conocimiento del tema y se identifican tres corrientes emergentes de investigación: sostenibilidad y rendimiento financiero, resultados financieros de la responsabilidad social corporativa, informes y reportes de sostenibilidad. Finalmente, se presenta una agenda para futuras investigaciones.

PDF
PDF

Referencias

  1. Aksnes, D. W. y Sivertsen, G. (2019). A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of Data and Information Science, 4(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2019-0001
  2. Alshehhi, A., Nobanee, H. y Khare, N. (2018). The Impact of Sustainability Practices on Corporate mFinancial Performance: Literature Trends and Future Research Potential. Sustainability, 10(2),494. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020494
  3. Anderson, T., Liu, Z., Cruz, J. y Wang, J. (2020). Social and Environmental Sustainability: An Empirical Analysis of Supply Chain Profitability and the Recession. Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(2) 176–193. https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0410261
  4. Anser, M. K., Zhang, Z. y Kanwal, L. (2018). Moderating Effect of Innovation on Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance in Realm of Sustainable Development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 799–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1495
  5. Aria, M. y Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix : An R-tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  6. Aria, M., Misuraca, M. y Spano, M. (2020). Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research. Social indicators research, 149(3), 803–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02281-3
  7. Arvidsson, A. y Caliandro, A. (2016). Brand Public. The Journal of consumer research, 42(5), 727–748. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv053
  8. Ates, S. (2020). Membership of Sustainability Index in an Emerging Market: Implications for Sustainability. Journal of cleaner production, 250, 119465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119465
  9. Bastian M., Heymann S. y Jacomy M. (2009). Gephi: an Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. https://gephi.org/users/publications/
  10. Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J., Lambiotte, R. y Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008
  11. Bond, M., Zawacki-Richter, O. y Nichols, M. (2019). Revisiting Five Decades of Educational Technology Research: A Content and Authorship Analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology.
  12. British journal of educational technology, 50(1), 12–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12730 Bristy, H. J., How, J. y Verhoeven, P. (2020). Gender diversity: the corporate social responsibility and financial performance nexus. International Journal of Managerial Finance, ahead-of-print, 291. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-04-2020-0176
  13. Buitrago, S., Duque, P. y Robledo, S. (2020). Branding corporativo: una revisión bibliográfica. Económicas CUC, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.41.1.2020.Org.1
  14. Busch, T. y Hoffmann, V. (2011). How Hot is your Bottom Line? Linking Carbon and Financial Performance. Business y Society, 50(2), 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650311398780
  15. Carroll, A. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497. https://doi.org/10.2307/257850
  16. Castro, R., Lima, C., Bazil, D., Oliveira, M. y Andrade, J. (2020). Sustainable Development and Corporate Financial Performance: A Study Based on the Brazilian Corporate Sustainability
  17. Index (ISE). Sustainable Development, 28(4), 960–977. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2049 Cheng, M. (2016). Sharing Economy: A Review and Agenda for Future Research. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 57, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.06.003
  18. Chung, J. y Cho, C. (2018). Current Trends Within Social and Environmental Accounting Research: A Literature Review. Accounting Perspectives, 17(2), 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12171
  19. Cormier, D. y Magnan, M. (1999). Corporate Environmental Disclosure Strategies: Determinants, Costs and Benefits. Journal of Accounting, Auditing y Finance, 14(4), 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x9901400403
  20. Demiroz, F. y Haase, T. (2019). The Concept of Resilience: a Bibliometric Analysis of the Emergency and Disaster Management Literature. Local Government Studies, 45(3), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1541796
  21. Deng, X. y Li, L. (2020). Promoting or Inhibiting? The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Corporate Financial Performance-An Empirical Analysis Based on China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113828
  22. DesJardine, M. R. y Durand, R. (2020). Disentangling the effects of hedge fund activism on firm financial and social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 41(6), 1054–1082. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3126
  23. Ding, Y., Yan, E., Frazho, A. y Caverlee, J. (2009). PageRank for Ranking Authors in Co-citation Networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. American Society for Information Science, 60(11), 2229–2243. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21171
  24. Duque, P. y Cervantes, L. S. (2019). Responsabilidad social universitaria: una revisión sistemática y análisis bibliométrico. Estudios Gerenciales, 35(153), 451-464. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2019.153.3389
  25. Duque, P. y Duque, J. (2020). Marketing digital y comercio electrónico: un análisis bibliométrico. Nuevos modelos de negocio. Centro de Investigaciones Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Administrativas y Contables. http://hdl.handle.net/10901/18463
  26. Duque, P., Meza, O., Zapata, G. y Giraldo, J. (2021). Internacionalización de empresas latinas: evolución y tendencias. Económicas CUC, 42(1), https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.42.1.2021.Org.1
  27. Duque, P., Samboni, V., Castro, M., Montoya, L. y Montoya, I. (2020). Neuromarketing: Its current status and research perspectives. Estudios Gerenciales, 36(157). https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2020.157.3890
  28. Echchakoui, S. (2020). Why and How to Merge Scopus and Web of Science During Bibliometric Analysis: the Case of Sales Force Literature from 1912 to 2019. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 8(3), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9
  29. Epstein, M. y Roy, M. (2001). Sustainability in Action: Identifying and Measuring the Key Performance Drivers. Long Range Planning, 34(5), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024--6301(01)00084-x
  30. Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J. y Davarzani, H. (2015). Green Supply Chain Management: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003
  31. Fatemi, A. y Fooladi, I. (2020). A primer on sustainable value creation. Review of Financial Economics, 38(3), 452–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1087
  32. Goss, A. y Roberts, G. (2011). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Cost of Bank Loans. Journal of Banking y Finance, 35(7), 1794–1810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.002
  33. Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D. y Donald , C. (2001). Social and Environmental Disclosure and Corporate Characteristics: A Research Note and Extension. Journal of Business Finance Accounting, 28(3-4), 327–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00376
  34. Grewatsch, S. y Kleindienst, I. (2017). When Does It Pay to be Good? Moderators and Mediators in the Corporate Sustainability–Corporate Financial Performance Relationship: A Critical Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 383–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2852-5
  35. Guandalini, I., Sun, W. y Zhou, L. (2019). Assessing the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals through switching cost. Journal of cleaner production, 232, 1430–1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.033
  36. Gurzki, H. y Woisetschläger, D. M. (2017). Mapping the Luxury Research Landscape: A Bibliometric Citation Analysis. Journal of business research, 77, 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2016.11.009
  37. Hizarci, A., İpek, İ. y Gümüş, G. (2020). How Environmental Innovation Influences Firm Performance: A meta-analytic Review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1174-1190. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2678
  38. Hou, T. (2019). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Financial Performance: Firm-level Evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1647
  39. Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A. y Gawankar, S. (2018). Sustainable Industry 4.0 Framework: A Systematic Literature Review Identifying the Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 408–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009
  40. Keskin, A. İ., Dincer, B. y Dincer, C. (2020). Exploring the Impact of Sustainability on Corporate Financial Performance Using Discriminant Analysis. Sustainability: Science Practice and Policy, 12(6), 2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062346
  41. Keskin, A. İ., Dincer, B. y Dincer, C. (2020). Exploring the Impact of Sustainability on Corporate Financial Performance Using Discriminant Analysis. Sustainability: Science Practice and Policy, 12(6), 2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062346
  42. Kuntner, T. y Teichert, T. (2016). The Scope of Price Promotion Research: An Informetric Study. Journal of business research, 69(8), 2687–2696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.004
  43. Lang, M. y Lundholm, R. (1993). Cross-Sectional Determinants of Analyst Ratings of Corporate Disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(2), 246. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491273
  44. Laverty, K. (1996). Economic “Short-Termism”: The Debate, the Unresolved Issues, and the Implications for Management Practice and Research. The Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 825-860. https://doi.org/10.2307/259003
  45. Lee, S. y Bozeman, B. (2005). The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity. Social studies of science, 35(5), 673–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
  46. Lee, S. P. y Isa, M. (2020). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Practices and Performance in Shariah Firms: Agency or Stakeholder Theory? Asian Academy of Management. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 16(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamjaf2020.16.1.1
  47. Liao, Z. (2020). Is Environmental Innovation Conducive to Corporate Financing? The Moderating Role of Advertising Expenditures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 954–961. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2409
  48. Liu, Y., Xi, B. y Wang, G. (2020). The Impact of Corporate Environmental Responsibility on Financial Performance-based on Chinese Listed companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, (28), 7840-7853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11069-4
  49. Li, W., Zheng, M., Zhang, Y. y Cui, G. (2020a). Green Governance Structure, Ownership Characteristics, and Corporate Financing Constraints. Journal of cleaner production, 260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121008
  50. Li, Z., Wang, Y., Tan, Y. y Huang, Z. (2020b). Does Corporate Financialization Affect Corporate Environmental Responsibility? An Empirical Study of China. Sustainability: Science Practice and Policy, 12(9), 3696. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093696
  51. Lu, W., Chau, K., Wang, H. y Pan, W. (2014). A decade’s Debate on the Nexus Between Corporate social and Corporate Financial Performance: A Critical Review of Empirical Studies 2002–2011. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.072
  52. McWilliams, A. y Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-0266%28200005%2921%3A5%3C603%3A%3AAID-SMJ101%3E3.0.CO%3B2-3
  53. McWilliams, A. y Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011987
  54. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. y Wright, P. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications*. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x
  55. Merediz-Solà, I. y Bariviera, A. (2019). A Bibliometric Analysis of Bitcoin Scientific Production. Research in International Business and Finance, 50, 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.06.008
  56. Molina, J., Claver, E., López, M. y Tarí, J. (2009). Green management and financial performance: a literature review. Management Decision, 47(7), 1080–1100. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910978313
  57. Na, H., Lee, K., Choi, S. y Kim, S. (2020). Exploring CEO Messages in Sustainability Management Reports: Applying Sentiment Mining and Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Methods. Sustainability: Science Practice and Policy, 12(2), 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020590
  58. Nair, A. y Bhattacharyya, S. (2019). Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility in India and itsEffect on Corporate Financial Performance: Perspectives from Institutional Theory and Resource-based View. Business Strategy and Development, 2(2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.46
  59. Ohri, A. (2012). R for Business Analytics. Springer Science y Business Media. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=D2Su4qomE4sC
  60. Oliverira, P., Roth, A. V. y Heitor, M. (2001, january 6). Mergers and Acquisitions: A Tool for Knowledge/ technology Transfer [conference]. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Estados Unidos. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2001.927143
  61. Orlitzky, M. (2008, january 6). Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance [conference]. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford University Press, Maui, Estados Unidos https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0005
  62. Orlitzky, M. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility, Noise, and Stock Market Volatility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(3), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0097
  63. Orlitzky, M. y Benjamin, J. (2001). Corporate Social Performance and Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review. Business y Society, 40(4), 369–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765030104000402
  64. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. y Rynes, S. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
  65. Orlitzky, M., Siegel, D. S. y Waldman, D. A. (2011). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability. Business y Society, 50(1), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310394323
  66. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R. y Winograd, T. (1999). The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/422/1/1999-66.pdf
  67. Palmer, K., Oates, W. y Portney, P. (1995). Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.119
  68. Pätäri, S., Arminen, H., Tuppura, A. y Jantunen, A. (2014). Competitive and Responsible? The Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance in the Energy Sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37, 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.012
  69. Pineiro, J., Romero, N. y Vizcaíno, M. (2019). Inclusions in and Exclusions from the SyP 500 Environmental and Socially Responsible Index: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Sustainability, 11(4), 1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041211
  70. Pizzi, S., Caputo, A., Corvino, A. y Venturelli, A. (2020). Management Research and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Bibliometric Investigation and Systematic Review. Journal of cleaner production, 276, 124033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124033
  71. Porter, M. E. y Van der Linde, C. (1995a). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
  72. Porter, M. E. y Van der Linde, C. (1995b). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. The Dynamics of the Eco-efficient Economy: Environmental Regulation and Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business School Reprint.
  73. Puck, J. y Filatotchev, I. (2018). Finance and the Multinational Company: Building Bridges Between Finance and Global Strategy Research. Global Strategy Journal, 29, 365. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1330
  74. Rubio, M., Del Mar Ramos-González, M., Sastr, M. y Danvila-del-Valle, I. (2020). Exploring Sustainability, Good Governance, and Social Responsibility in Small and Medium Enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 852–869. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1849
  75. Saini, N. y Singhania, M. (2019). Performance Relevance of Environmental and Social Disclosures: The Role of Foreign Ownership. Bijdragen tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie, 26(6), 1845–1873. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2018-0114
  76. Salazar, D., Álvarez, J., Garcés, J. y Duque, P. (2020). Riesgos en las microfinanzas: una revisión y análisis Bibliométrico*. Interfaces, 3(2). http://www.unilibrecucuta.edu.co/ojs/index.php/ingenieria/article/view/484
  77. Sandhu, S., Orlitzky, M. y Louche, C. (2019). How Nation-level Background Governance Conditions Shape the Economic Payoffs of Corporate Environmental Performance. Management Decision, 57(10), 2714–2739. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-11-2017-1191
  78. Servaes, H. y Tamayo, A. (2013). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value: The Role of Customer Awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045–1061. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1630
  79. Shafique, M. (2013). Thinking Inside the Box? Intellectual Structure of the Knowledge Base of Innovation Research (1988-2008): Intellectual Structure of Innovation Research (1988-2008). Strategic Management Journal, 34(1), 62–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2002
  80. SJR - SCImago Journal y Country Rank. (2020). SCImago. https://www.scimagojr.com/
  81. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the Scientific Literature: A New Measure of the Relationship Between Two Documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
  82. Small, H. G. (1977). A Co-Citation Model of a Scientific Specialty: A Longitudinal Study of Collagen Research. Social studies of science, 7(2), 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277700700202
  83. Tani, M., Papaluca, O. y Sasso, P. (2018). The System Thinking Perspective in the Open-Innovation Research: A Systematic Review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(3), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc4030038
  84. Tsai, C. y Mutuc, E. (2020). Evidence in Asian Food Industry: Intellectual Capital, Corporate Financial Performance, and Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020663
  85. Veltri, S. y Silvestri, A. (2020). The Value Relevance of Corporate Financial and Nonfinancial Information Provided by the Integrated report: A Systematic Review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3038-3054. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2556
  86. Waddock, S. y Graves, S. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance-financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4%3C303::AID-SMJ869%3E3.0.CO;2-G
  87. Waddock, S. A., Bodwell, C. y Graves, S. B. (2002). Responsibility: The New Business Imperative. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(2), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2002.7173581
  88. Waddock, S. (2003). Myths and Realities of Social Investing. Organization y Environment, 16(3),369–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026603256284
  89. Wallis, W. (2007). A Beginner’s Guide to Graph Theory. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4580-9
  90. Wasserman, S. y Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/social-network-analysis/90030086891EB3491D096034684EFFB8
  91. Wiseman, J. (1982). An Evaluation of Environmental Disclosures Made in Corporate Annual Reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(82)90025-3
  92. Wood, D. (2010). Measuring Corporate Social Performance: A Review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 50–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00274.x
  93. Yan, E., Ding, Y. y Sugimoto, C. (2010). P-Rank: An Indicator Measuring Prestige in Heterogeneous Scholarly Networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. American Society for Information Science, 56. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21461
  94. Yang, S., Keller, F. y Zheng, L. (2016). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Examples. SAGE Publications. Yusof, N., Tabassi, A. y Esa, M. (2020). Going Beyond Environmental Regulations -The Influence of Firm Size on the Effect of green practices on corporate financial performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1771
  95. Zhang, Y., Xing, C. y Wang, Y. (2020). Does Green Innovation Mitigate Financing Constraints? Evidence from China’s Private Enterprises. Journal of cleaner production, 264, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121698
  96. Zhao, N. y Wang, Q. (2020). Analysis of Two Financing Modes in Green Supply Chains when Considering the Role of Data Collection. Industrial Management y Data Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-10-2019-0557
  97. Zhu, J. y Liu, W. (2020). A Tale of Two Databases: the Use of Web of Science and Scopus in Academic Papers. Scientometrics, 123(1), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8
  98. Zuluaga, M., Robledo, S., Osorio Zuluaga, G. A., Yathe, L., Gonzalez, D. y Taborda, G. (2016). Metabolómica y pesticidas: revisión sistemática de literatura usando teoría de grafos para el análisis de referencias. Nova, 14(25), 121. https://doi.org/10.22490/24629448.1735
  99. Zupic, I. y Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
  100. Zuschke, N. (2020). An Analysis of Process-tracing Research on Consumer Decision-making. Journal of business research, 111, 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.028
Cómo citar
Duque, P., Trejos, D., Hoyos, O., & Chica Mesa, J. C. (2021). Finanzas corporativas y sostenibilidad: un análisis bibliométrico e identificación de tendencias. Semestre Económico, 24(56), 25-51. https://doi.org/10.22395/seec.v24n56a1

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel

Estamos indexados en