Kinetics of Combustion of Densified Fuels from Residues of Isabella Grape Processing (Vitis labrusca L.)
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Articles
- Submitted: December 2, 2015
-
Published: July 4, 2018
Abstract
This paper presents the results of the kinetics of combustion by thermogravimetry of briquettes prepared with residues of vine shoots, skins, stalks and seeds, obtained from the cultivation and processing of Isabella grapes (Vitis labrusca L.). The briquettes were prepared by compression and characterized by near analysis, elemental analysis and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The TGA was carried out at three heating rates and in air atmosphere. With the results of the TGA the activation energy was determined by the Iso-conversion methods of Starink and Friedman, and the order of reaction by the Avrami method. The Starink method was found to be more accurate than the Friedman method in calculating activation energy. In addition, reaction order values are very similar for the residues and mixtures analyzed.
References
[2] J. B. Dahiya, et al., “Kinetics of isothermal and non-isothermal degradation of cellulose: model-based and model-free methods”, Polymer International, vol. 57, pp. 722-729, 2008.
[3] M. Valente, et al., “Investigation of grape marc combustion using thermogravimetric analysis. Kinetic modeling using an extended independent parallel reaction (EIPR)”, Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 131, pp. 297-303, 2015.
[4] C. Gai, et al., “The kinetic analysis of the pyrolysis of agricultural residue under nonisothermal conditions”, Bioresource Technology, vol. 127, pp. 298-305, 2013.
[5] L. Fiori, et al., “Modeling of the devolatilization kinetics during pyrolysis of grape residues”, Bioresource Technology, vol. 103, pp. 389–397, 2012.
[6] A. Anca-Couce, et al., “How to determine consistent biomass pyrolysis kinetics in a parallel reaction scheme”, Fuel, vol. 123, pp. 230-240, 2014.
[7] J. E. White, et al., “Biomass pyrolysis kinetics: a comparative critical review with relevant agricultural residue case studies”, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, vol. 91, n.° 1, pp. 1-33, 2011.
[8] A. C. Deiana, et al., “Use of grape stalk, a waste of the viticulture industry, to obtain activated carbon”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 172, pp. 13-19, 2009.
[9] M. V. Kok and E. Özgür, “Thermal analysis and kinetics of biomass samples”, Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 106, pp. 739-743, 2013.
[10] Q. Xu, et al., “A kinetic study on the effects of alkaline earth and alkali metal compounds for catalytic pyrolysis of microalgae using thermogravimetry“, Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 73, pp. 355-359, 2014.
[11] X. Peng, et al., “Thermogravimetric analysis of co-combustion between microalgae and textile dyeing sludge”, Bioresource Technology, vol. 180, pp. 288-295, 2015.
[12] C. Gai, et al., “Combustion behavior and kinetics of low-lipid microalgae via thermogravimetric analysis”, Bioresource Technology, vol. 181, pp. 148-154, 2015.
[13] D. Jelic, et al., “A thermogravimetric study of reduction of silver oxide under non-isothermal conditions”, Contemporary Materials, vol. 2, pp. 144-150, 2010.
[14] D. López-González, et al., “Thermogravimetric-mass spectrometric analysis on combustion of lignocellulosic biomass”, Bioresource Technology, vol. 143, pp. 562–574, 2013.
[15] M. Jeguirim and G. Trouvé, “Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of Arundo donax using thermogravimetric analysis”, Bioresource Technology, vol. 100, pp. 4026-4031, 2009.
Downloads
