A Representation Proposal of Practices for Teaching and Learning Software Engineering Using a Semat Kernel Extension
Copyright and Licensing:
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Articles
- Submitted: November 16, 2016
-
Published: July 4, 2018
Abstract
Software engineering is a discipline oriented to the definition of methods, techniques and tools for developing software products in an efficient and rapid way. Growing demand of such products generates the need of a large amount of software engineers with the technical and social competencies required by software industry. This situation is a challenge for Higher Education Institutions in terms of a training process of future professionals of this discipline. In this sense, such institutions are exploring active teaching strategies for promoting the needed competencies in students. However, an integrated proposal of these teaching approaches is still underdeveloped. In this paper, the authors present a proposal for representing practices for teaching and learning software engineering, oriented to identify the main concepts included in any type of these practices. The proposal is based on the Semat kernel –Essence standard– as universal framework for representing software engineering practices, defining an extension to such kernel. Finally, we present a representation example of a software engineering teaching and learning practice using the Semat Kernel Extension proposed.
Sin título
Sin título
Sin título
Sin título
Sin título
Sin título
Sin título
Sin título
Sin título
Sin título
Sin título
Sin título
Sin título
Carta _Cesión_Derechos
carta_formato_originalidad_cesion Gómez_Dams_Barón
Comentario al editor
References
[1] I. Sommerville, Software Engineering (9 ed.), New York: Addison-Wesley, 2010.
[2] S. Olson and D. G. Riordan, “Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President.,” Exec. Off. Pres., 2012.
[3] M. Qureshi, M. Asim, and M. Nadeem, “A new teaching model for the subject of software project management,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv, vol. 22, no.1, pp. 295-303, 2012.
[4] F. Ma, W. Li, J. Si, and L. Wang, “Theoretical Construction of Prototype Teaching Model,” in 2010 Second International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science, 2010, vol. 3, pp. 802-805.
[5] C. N. Bull and J. Whittle, “Supporting Reflective Practice in Software Engineering Education through a Studio-Based Approach,” IEEE Softw., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 44-50, Jul. 2014.
[6] C. Moller, G. Reina, M. Burch, and D. Weiskopf, “Large-Scale Visualization Projects for Teaching Software Engineering,” IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 14-19, Jul. 2012.
[7] A. Dorling and F. McCaffery, “The Gamification of SPICE,” in Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 295–301.
[8] Object Management Group, “Kernel and Language for Software Engineering Methods (Essence)” Object Management Group, Massachusets, Document Number formal/15-12-03, Nov, 2014. [online]. Available: http://www.omg.org/spec/Essence/1.0
[9] IEEE Computer Society, P. Bourque, and R. E. Fairley, Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK(R)): Version 3.0. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2014.
[10] R. J., LeBlanc, A. Sobel, J. L., Díaz-Herrera, and T. B. Hilburn. Software Engineering 2004: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering. New York, NY: IEEE Computer Society, 2004.
[11] D. Madigan, and M. Print, “IEEE 1547 and 2030 Standards for Distributed Energy Resources Interconnection and Interoperability with the Electricity Grid,” Agile construction initiative, 2014. Available: http://www.bath.ac.uk/management/larg_agile/publications/pdf/cnu97-38.pdf
[12] T. Basso, “IEEE 1547 and 2030 standards for distributed energy resources interconnection and interoperability with the electricity grid,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory - U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, United States, Technical Report NREL/TP-5D00-63157, 2014 [online]. Available: http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/63157.pdf
[13] Government of Alberta, “Best Practices for the Assessment and Control of Chemical Hazards,” vol. 3, Best Practices Guidelines for Occupational Health and Safety in the Healthcare Industry, Alberta: Government of Alberta, 2010. Available: https://work.alberta.ca/documents/WHS-PUB_bp011.pdf
[14] V. Dhole, R. Beck, D. Tremblay, D. Ajikutira, and S. Mullick, “Transformation of Process Engineering – Innovations and Best Practices,” Aspen Technology Inc., Massachusets, White Paper 11-1195-0812 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.aspentech.com/Transformation_of_Process_Engineering.pdf
[15] Software Engineering Institute, “CMMI for Development, Version 1.3,” Carnegie Mellon Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Nov, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://cmmiinstitute.com/resources/cmmi-development-version-13
[16] Object Management Group, “Kernel and Language for Software Engineering Methods (Essence)-Version 1.1,” Object Management Group, Massachusets, Document Number ptc/15-05-13, Dec, 2015. [online]. Available: https://www.omg.org/spec/Essence/1.1
[17] P. Grossman, C. Compton, D. Igra, M. Ronfeldt, E. Shahan, and P. Williamson, “Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective,” Teachers College Record, vol. 111, no. 9, pp. 2055-2100, 2009.
[18] P. E. G. Férez, “Un acercamiento al trabajo colaborativo,” Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1-14, 2005.
[19] R. M. Harden, “Learning outcomes and instructional objectives: is there a difference?,” Medical teacher, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 151-155, 2002.
[20] A. García, and M. Daneri, “Investigación e innovación en el conocimiento educativo actual,” En R. I. Roig y J.E. Blasco (Coord.), 2008.
[21] H. Chen and K. Damevski, “A teaching model for development of sensor-driven mobile applications,” in Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education, 2014, pp. 147-152.
[22] M. L. I. Forneiro, “Observación y evaluación del ambiente de aprendizaje en educación infantil: dimensiones y variables a considerar,” Revista Iberoamericana de educación, no. 47, pp. 49-70, 2008.
[23] A. M. Vivar Quintana, A. B. González Rogado, A. B. Ramos Gavilán, I. R. Martín, M. Ascensión, R. Esteban, T. A. Zorrila, and J. F. Martín Izard, “Application of rubric in learning assessment: a proposal of application for engineering students,” in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality, 2013, pp. 441–446.
[24] M. Spellings, A test of leadership: Charting the future of US higher education. Washington DC: US Department of Education, 2006.
[25] D. Golden, “Colleges, accreditors seek better ways to measure learning,” Wall Street Journal, pp. 738027–298, 2006.
[26] Merriam Webster, “Definition of conceptualization.” [Online]. Available: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conceptualization.
[27] K. J. Stol and B. Fitzgerald, “Uncovering theories in software engineering,” in 2nd Semat Workshop on a General Theory of Software Engineering (GTSE), 2013, San Francisco, California, United States, 2013, pp. 5–14.
[28] C. M. Zapata Jaramillo, A. Gelbukh, and F. Arango Isaza, “Pre-conceptual Schema: A Conceptual-Graph-Like Knowledge Representation for Requirements Elicitation,” in SpringerLink, 2006, pp. 27–37, [Online]. Available: https://nlp.cic.ipn.mx/Publications/2006/MICAI-2006-Preconceptual.pdf.
[29] C. M. Zapata, G. L. Giraldo, and S. Londoño, “Esquemas preconceptuales ejecutables,” Avances en Sistemas e Informática, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 2011.
[30] D. I. K. Sjøberg, T. Dybå, B. C. Anda, and J. E. Hannay, “Building theories in software engineering,” in Guide to advanced empirical software engineering, F. Shull, J. Singer, and D. I. K. Sjøberg, Eds. London: Springer, 2008, pp. 312–336.
[31] M. Ekstedt, “An empirical approach to a general theory of software (engineering),” in 2nd Semat Workshop on a General Theory of Software Engineering (GTSE), 2013, San Francisco, California, United States, 2013, pp. 23–26.
[32] Semat.org, “What is it and why should you care? - Semat.” [Online]. Available: http://semat.org/what-is-it-and-why-should-you-care-.
[33] B. Elvesæter, G. Benguria, and S. Ilieva, “A comparison of the Essence 1.0 and SPEM 2.0 specifications for software engineering methods,” in Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Process-Based Approaches for Model-Driven Engineering, New York, NY, 2013, p. 2.
[34] Object Management Group, “Software & Systems Process Engineering Meta-Model Specification” Object Management Group, Massachusets, Document Number formal/08-04-01, Apr, 2008. [online]. Available: https://www.omg.org/spec/SPEM/2.0/PDF.
[35] ISO, “ISO 9000 - Quality management,” ISO 9000 - Quality management, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/management-standards/iso_9000.htm.
[36] I. Jacobson, P.-W. Ng, P. McMahon, I. Spence, and S. Lidman, “The Essence of Software Engineering: The Semat Kernel,” Queue, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 40:40–40:51, Oct. 2012.
[37] I. Jacobson, P.-W. Ng, P. E. McMahon, I. Spence, and S. Lidman, The Essence of Software Engineering: Applying the Semat Kernel, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc, 2013.
[38] C. M. Zapata-Jaramillo, “An executable pre-conceptual schema for a software engineering general theory,” in Software Engineering: Methods, Modeling, vol. 3, C. M. Zapata-Jaramillo and L. F. Castro-Rojas, Eds. Medellín: Centro Editorial de la Facultad de Minas, 2014, pp. 3–7.
[39] C. Zapata, L. Castro, H. Shihong, and P.-W. Ng, “Preface,” in Software Engineering: Methods, Modeling, and Teaching, vol. 3, C. M. Zapata-Jaramillo and L. F. Castro-Rojas, Eds. Medellín: Centro Editorial de la Facultad de Minas, 2014, pp. v–ix.
[40] T. Guowei, G. Lingling, F. Yu, L. Jinghui, and Z. Wanping, G. Lee, Eds., “Research and Practice on ‘Triple-driven’ Based Software Development Practical Teaching System,” in International Conference on Future Computer Supported Education, Fraser Place Central - Seoul, IERI Procedia, Aug 22- 23, 2012, Vol. 2, pp 18-23.
[41] D. I. K. Sjøberg, T. Dybå, B. C. Anda, and J. E. Hannay, “Building theories in software engineering,” in Guide to advanced empirical software engineering, F. Shull, J. Singer, and D. I. K. Sjøberg, Eds. London: Springer, 2008, pp. 312–336.
[42] M. Ekstedt, “An empirical approach to a general theory of software (engineering),” in 2nd Semat Workshop on a General Theory of Software Engineering (GTSE), 2013, San Francisco, California, United States, 2013, pp. 23–26.
[43] B. Kitchenham, “Procedures for performing systematic reviews,” Keele, UK, Keele University, vol. 33, no. 2004, pp. 1–26, 2004.
[44] R. Sánchez-Dams, A. Barón-Salazar, and M. C. Gómez-Álvarez, “An Extension of the Semat Kernel for Representing Teaching and Learning Practices about Embedded Systems,” in 4th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT), Ciudad de México, 2016, pp. 39–46.
[45] A. Hazeyama, “Collaborative Software Engineering Learning Environment Associating Artifacts Management with Communication Support,” IIAI 3rd International Conference on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAIAAI), 2014, Kitakyushu, 2014, pp. 592-596.
[2] S. Olson and D. G. Riordan, “Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President.,” Exec. Off. Pres., 2012.
[3] M. Qureshi, M. Asim, and M. Nadeem, “A new teaching model for the subject of software project management,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv, vol. 22, no.1, pp. 295-303, 2012.
[4] F. Ma, W. Li, J. Si, and L. Wang, “Theoretical Construction of Prototype Teaching Model,” in 2010 Second International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science, 2010, vol. 3, pp. 802-805.
[5] C. N. Bull and J. Whittle, “Supporting Reflective Practice in Software Engineering Education through a Studio-Based Approach,” IEEE Softw., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 44-50, Jul. 2014.
[6] C. Moller, G. Reina, M. Burch, and D. Weiskopf, “Large-Scale Visualization Projects for Teaching Software Engineering,” IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 14-19, Jul. 2012.
[7] A. Dorling and F. McCaffery, “The Gamification of SPICE,” in Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 295–301.
[8] Object Management Group, “Kernel and Language for Software Engineering Methods (Essence)” Object Management Group, Massachusets, Document Number formal/15-12-03, Nov, 2014. [online]. Available: http://www.omg.org/spec/Essence/1.0
[9] IEEE Computer Society, P. Bourque, and R. E. Fairley, Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK(R)): Version 3.0. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2014.
[10] R. J., LeBlanc, A. Sobel, J. L., Díaz-Herrera, and T. B. Hilburn. Software Engineering 2004: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering. New York, NY: IEEE Computer Society, 2004.
[11] D. Madigan, and M. Print, “IEEE 1547 and 2030 Standards for Distributed Energy Resources Interconnection and Interoperability with the Electricity Grid,” Agile construction initiative, 2014. Available: http://www.bath.ac.uk/management/larg_agile/publications/pdf/cnu97-38.pdf
[12] T. Basso, “IEEE 1547 and 2030 standards for distributed energy resources interconnection and interoperability with the electricity grid,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory - U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, United States, Technical Report NREL/TP-5D00-63157, 2014 [online]. Available: http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/63157.pdf
[13] Government of Alberta, “Best Practices for the Assessment and Control of Chemical Hazards,” vol. 3, Best Practices Guidelines for Occupational Health and Safety in the Healthcare Industry, Alberta: Government of Alberta, 2010. Available: https://work.alberta.ca/documents/WHS-PUB_bp011.pdf
[14] V. Dhole, R. Beck, D. Tremblay, D. Ajikutira, and S. Mullick, “Transformation of Process Engineering – Innovations and Best Practices,” Aspen Technology Inc., Massachusets, White Paper 11-1195-0812 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.aspentech.com/Transformation_of_Process_Engineering.pdf
[15] Software Engineering Institute, “CMMI for Development, Version 1.3,” Carnegie Mellon Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Nov, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://cmmiinstitute.com/resources/cmmi-development-version-13
[16] Object Management Group, “Kernel and Language for Software Engineering Methods (Essence)-Version 1.1,” Object Management Group, Massachusets, Document Number ptc/15-05-13, Dec, 2015. [online]. Available: https://www.omg.org/spec/Essence/1.1
[17] P. Grossman, C. Compton, D. Igra, M. Ronfeldt, E. Shahan, and P. Williamson, “Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective,” Teachers College Record, vol. 111, no. 9, pp. 2055-2100, 2009.
[18] P. E. G. Férez, “Un acercamiento al trabajo colaborativo,” Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1-14, 2005.
[19] R. M. Harden, “Learning outcomes and instructional objectives: is there a difference?,” Medical teacher, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 151-155, 2002.
[20] A. García, and M. Daneri, “Investigación e innovación en el conocimiento educativo actual,” En R. I. Roig y J.E. Blasco (Coord.), 2008.
[21] H. Chen and K. Damevski, “A teaching model for development of sensor-driven mobile applications,” in Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education, 2014, pp. 147-152.
[22] M. L. I. Forneiro, “Observación y evaluación del ambiente de aprendizaje en educación infantil: dimensiones y variables a considerar,” Revista Iberoamericana de educación, no. 47, pp. 49-70, 2008.
[23] A. M. Vivar Quintana, A. B. González Rogado, A. B. Ramos Gavilán, I. R. Martín, M. Ascensión, R. Esteban, T. A. Zorrila, and J. F. Martín Izard, “Application of rubric in learning assessment: a proposal of application for engineering students,” in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality, 2013, pp. 441–446.
[24] M. Spellings, A test of leadership: Charting the future of US higher education. Washington DC: US Department of Education, 2006.
[25] D. Golden, “Colleges, accreditors seek better ways to measure learning,” Wall Street Journal, pp. 738027–298, 2006.
[26] Merriam Webster, “Definition of conceptualization.” [Online]. Available: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conceptualization.
[27] K. J. Stol and B. Fitzgerald, “Uncovering theories in software engineering,” in 2nd Semat Workshop on a General Theory of Software Engineering (GTSE), 2013, San Francisco, California, United States, 2013, pp. 5–14.
[28] C. M. Zapata Jaramillo, A. Gelbukh, and F. Arango Isaza, “Pre-conceptual Schema: A Conceptual-Graph-Like Knowledge Representation for Requirements Elicitation,” in SpringerLink, 2006, pp. 27–37, [Online]. Available: https://nlp.cic.ipn.mx/Publications/2006/MICAI-2006-Preconceptual.pdf.
[29] C. M. Zapata, G. L. Giraldo, and S. Londoño, “Esquemas preconceptuales ejecutables,” Avances en Sistemas e Informática, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 2011.
[30] D. I. K. Sjøberg, T. Dybå, B. C. Anda, and J. E. Hannay, “Building theories in software engineering,” in Guide to advanced empirical software engineering, F. Shull, J. Singer, and D. I. K. Sjøberg, Eds. London: Springer, 2008, pp. 312–336.
[31] M. Ekstedt, “An empirical approach to a general theory of software (engineering),” in 2nd Semat Workshop on a General Theory of Software Engineering (GTSE), 2013, San Francisco, California, United States, 2013, pp. 23–26.
[32] Semat.org, “What is it and why should you care? - Semat.” [Online]. Available: http://semat.org/what-is-it-and-why-should-you-care-.
[33] B. Elvesæter, G. Benguria, and S. Ilieva, “A comparison of the Essence 1.0 and SPEM 2.0 specifications for software engineering methods,” in Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Process-Based Approaches for Model-Driven Engineering, New York, NY, 2013, p. 2.
[34] Object Management Group, “Software & Systems Process Engineering Meta-Model Specification” Object Management Group, Massachusets, Document Number formal/08-04-01, Apr, 2008. [online]. Available: https://www.omg.org/spec/SPEM/2.0/PDF.
[35] ISO, “ISO 9000 - Quality management,” ISO 9000 - Quality management, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/management-standards/iso_9000.htm.
[36] I. Jacobson, P.-W. Ng, P. McMahon, I. Spence, and S. Lidman, “The Essence of Software Engineering: The Semat Kernel,” Queue, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 40:40–40:51, Oct. 2012.
[37] I. Jacobson, P.-W. Ng, P. E. McMahon, I. Spence, and S. Lidman, The Essence of Software Engineering: Applying the Semat Kernel, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc, 2013.
[38] C. M. Zapata-Jaramillo, “An executable pre-conceptual schema for a software engineering general theory,” in Software Engineering: Methods, Modeling, vol. 3, C. M. Zapata-Jaramillo and L. F. Castro-Rojas, Eds. Medellín: Centro Editorial de la Facultad de Minas, 2014, pp. 3–7.
[39] C. Zapata, L. Castro, H. Shihong, and P.-W. Ng, “Preface,” in Software Engineering: Methods, Modeling, and Teaching, vol. 3, C. M. Zapata-Jaramillo and L. F. Castro-Rojas, Eds. Medellín: Centro Editorial de la Facultad de Minas, 2014, pp. v–ix.
[40] T. Guowei, G. Lingling, F. Yu, L. Jinghui, and Z. Wanping, G. Lee, Eds., “Research and Practice on ‘Triple-driven’ Based Software Development Practical Teaching System,” in International Conference on Future Computer Supported Education, Fraser Place Central - Seoul, IERI Procedia, Aug 22- 23, 2012, Vol. 2, pp 18-23.
[41] D. I. K. Sjøberg, T. Dybå, B. C. Anda, and J. E. Hannay, “Building theories in software engineering,” in Guide to advanced empirical software engineering, F. Shull, J. Singer, and D. I. K. Sjøberg, Eds. London: Springer, 2008, pp. 312–336.
[42] M. Ekstedt, “An empirical approach to a general theory of software (engineering),” in 2nd Semat Workshop on a General Theory of Software Engineering (GTSE), 2013, San Francisco, California, United States, 2013, pp. 23–26.
[43] B. Kitchenham, “Procedures for performing systematic reviews,” Keele, UK, Keele University, vol. 33, no. 2004, pp. 1–26, 2004.
[44] R. Sánchez-Dams, A. Barón-Salazar, and M. C. Gómez-Álvarez, “An Extension of the Semat Kernel for Representing Teaching and Learning Practices about Embedded Systems,” in 4th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT), Ciudad de México, 2016, pp. 39–46.
[45] A. Hazeyama, “Collaborative Software Engineering Learning Environment Associating Artifacts Management with Communication Support,” IIAI 3rd International Conference on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAIAAI), 2014, Kitakyushu, 2014, pp. 592-596.
How to Cite
Gómez Álvarez, M. C., Sanchez-Dams, R. D., & Barón Salazar, A. A. (2018). A Representation Proposal of Practices for Teaching and Learning Software Engineering Using a Semat Kernel Extension. Revista Ingenierías Universidad De Medellín, 17(32), 129-154. https://doi.org/10.22395/rium.v17n32a7
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
