Tendências teóricas e desafios na comunicação da responsabilidade social corporativa

David Díez
Universidad Católica de Manizales
Juliana Díaz-Ospina
Universidad Católica de Manizales
Sebastian Robledo
Universidad Católica Luis Amigó
María del Pilar Rodríguez-Córdoba
Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Resumo

O artigo tem como objetivo caracterizar a literatura acadêmica sobre comunicação de responsabilidade social corporativa (Corsc), como base para o mapeamento de tendências teóricas e desafios práticos neste campo acadêmico e profissional. Esta pesquisa é de especial interesse para organizações que comunicam suas práticas de responsabilidade social a fim de convencer seus consumidores e engajar seus funcionários. Também para grupos de interesse, como organizações da sociedade civil, que aspiram a uma construção mais dialógica do sentido e das multas da responsabilidade social empresarial. Ambas as frentes de reflexão enquadramse numa abordagem integradora do Corsc (modelo 4I), que permite organizar e compreender como se complementam múltiplas teorias relacionadas com o que é, para que serve e como funciona este processo de comunicação. Essa utilidade é destacada pela escassez de revisões sistemáticas sobre Corsc baseadas em abordagens integrativas. Por meio de uma revisão bibliográfica sistemática de abordagem quantitativa e qualitativa, confirmou-se a necessidade de realizar pesquisas que estudem paralelamente as quatro dimensões do Corsc: identidade, integração, interpretação e imagem. O anterior, a partir de uma perspectiva ética que reconhece o papel construtivo do design no estudo e na prática da comunicação da responsabilidade social corporativa.

Referências

  1. Amaladoss, M. y Manohar, H. (2013). Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility - A Case
  2. of CSR Communication in Emerging Economies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(2), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.287
  3. Andreu, L., Casado-Díaz, A. y Mattila, A. (2015). Effects of Message Appeal and Service Type in CSR Communication Strategies. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1488–1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.039
  4. Aramayo, A., Arimany-Serrat, N., Uribe, C. y Sabata-Aliberch, A. (2016). Web Communication of CSR and Financial Performance: Study Applied to Catalan Meat Companies. Intangible Capital, 12(2), 391-419. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.590
  5. Aria, M. y Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix : An R-tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  6. Arvidsson, S. (2010). Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Study of the Views of Management Teams in Large Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0469-2
  7. Becker-Olsen, K., Taylor, C. y Hill, R., Yalcinkaya, G. (2011). A Cross-Cultural Examination of Corporate Social Responsibility Marketing Communications in Mexico and the United States: Strategies for Global Brands. Journal of International Marketing, 19(2), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.19.2.30
  8. Blondel, V., Guillaume, J., Lambiotte, R. y Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008, 1-12. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008/pdf
  9. Branco, M., Delgado, C., Sá, M. y Sousa, C. (2014). Comparing CSR Communication on Corporate Web Sites in Sweden and Spain. Baltic Journal of Management, 9(2), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-10-2013-0151
  10. Castelló, I., Morsing, M. y Schultz, F. (2013). Communicative Dynamics and the Polyphony of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Network Society. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 683–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1954-1
  11. Chaudri, V. y Wang, J. (2007). Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility on the Internet. A Case Study of the Top 100 Information Technology Companies in India. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(2), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318907308746
  12. Chung, A. y Jiang, H. (2017). Handling Negative Publicity. The Influence of Employing CSR Communication in Apology Statements in Reducing Anger and Negative Word-of-Mouth (NWOM). Journal of Communication Management, 21(3), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-11-2016-0091
  13. Crane, A. y Glozer, S. (2016). Researching Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Themes, Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1223–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12196
  14. Dhanesh, G. (2015). The Paradox of Communicating CSR in India: Minimalist and Strategic Approaches. Journal of Public Relations Research, 27(5), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726x.2015.1084583
  15. Díez, D. y Rodríguez-Córdoba, M. (2019). Practically Wise Ethical Decision-Making: An Ethnographic Application to the UNE-Millicom Merger. Business Ethics: A European Review, 28(4), 494-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12226
  16. Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D., Miller, T., Sutton, A., Shaw, R., Smith, J. y Young, B. (2006). How Can Systematic Reviews Incorporate Qualitative Research? A Critical Perspective. Qualitative Research: QR, 6(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058867
  17. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. y Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of CSR Communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x
  18. Duque, P., Meza, O. E., Giraldo, D. y Barreto, K. (2021). Economía social y economía solidaria: un análisis bibliométrico y revisión de literatura. Revesco: revista de estudios cooperativos, (138), 187-212. http://doi.org/10.5209/reve.75566
  19. Durán-Aranguren, D., Robledo, S., Gomez-Restrepo, E., Arboleda, J. y Tarazona, N. (2021). Scientometric Overview of Coffee By-Products and Their Applications. Molecules, 26(24), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247605
  20. Eberle, D., Berens, G. y Li, T. (2013). The Impact of Interactive Corporate Social Responsibility Communication on Corporate Reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 731–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1957-y
  21. Ellerup-Nielsen, A., Thomsen, C. (2018). Reviewing Corporate Social Responsibility Communication:
  22. a Legitimacy Perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23(4), 492–511.
  23. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2018-0042
  24. Elving, W., Golob, U., Podnar, K., Ellerup-Nielsen, A. y Thomson, C. (2015). The Bad, the Ugly and the Good: New Challenges for CSR Communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-02-2015-0006
  25. Fellows, I. (2018). Package “wordcloud”. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/wordcloud/
  26. wordcloud.pdf
  27. Feng, G. (2014). Intercoder Reliability Indices: Disuse, Misuse, and Abuse. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 48(3), 1803–1815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9956-8
  28. Feng, G. C. (2015). Mistakes and how to avoid mistakes in using intercoder reliability indices. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 11(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000086
  29. Forero-Santos, J. (2016). Reflexiones teóricas sobre el uso y el consumo de objetos y mercancías. En Publicidad. Abordajes epistemológicos, creatividad, consumo y marca (pp. 47-89). Centro Editorial Universidad Católica de Manizales; Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolívar.
  30. Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
  31. García-Marzá, D. (2017). De los códigos a las auditorías éticas: una infraestructura ética para la comunicación de la responsabilidad social. El Profesional de La Información, 26(2), 268–276. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9605-1771
  32. Greenpeace México (2010, 18 de marzo). Nestlé destruye los bosques de Indonesia [vídeo]. YouTube.
  33. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJIPPnccAjE.
  34. Gonzalez-Correa, C.-A., Tapasco-Tapasco, L.-O. y Gomez-Buitrago, P.-A. (2022). A Method for a Literature Search on Microbiota and Obesity for PhD Biomedical Research Using the Web of Science (WoS) and the Tree of Science (ToS). Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (99). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2679
  35. Guba, E. y Lincoln, Y. (2002). Paradigmas en competencia en la investigación cualitativa. En C. Denman y J. A. Haro (comp.), Por los rincones. Antología de métodos cualitativos en la investigación social (pp. 113-145). El Colegio de Sonora.
  36. Guimarães-Costa, N. y Cunha, M. (2008). Theatrium Effect of Website Openness on the Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.128
  37. Habermas, J. (1988). Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Taurus. Hao, Y., Farooq, Q. y Sun, Y. (2018). Development of Theoretical Framework and Measures for the Role of Social Media in Realizing Corporate Social Responsibility Through Native and Non- Native Communication Modes: Moderating Effects of Cross-Cultural Management. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25, 704–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1523
  38. Jahdi, K. y Acikdilli, G. (2009). Marketing Communications and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Marriage of Convenience or Shotgun Wedding? Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0113-1
  39. Kim, S. y Ji, Y. (2017). Chinese Consumers’ Expectations of Corporate Communication on CSR and Sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(6), 570–588. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1429
  40. Koep, L. (2017a). Tensions in Aspirational CSR Communication—A Longitudinal Investigation of CSR Reporting. Sustainability, 9(12), 2202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122202
  41. Koep, L. (2017b). Investigating Industry Expert Discourses on Aspirational CSR Communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 22(2), 220–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-01-2016-0011
  42. Lattemann, C., Fetscherin, M., Alon, I., Li, S. y Schneider, A. (2009). CSR Communication Intensity
  43. in Chinese and Indian Multinational Companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review,
  44. (4), 426–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00758.x
  45. Lauritsen, B. y Perks, K. (2015). The Influence of Interactive, Non-Interactive, Implicit and Explicit CSR Communication on Young Adults’ Perception of UK Supermarkets’ Corporate Brand Image and Reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-09-2013-0065
  46. Moisescu, O. (2015). Communicating CSR in the Online Environment: Evidence from the Romanian
  47. Tourism Distribution Sector. Journal of International Hospitality, Leisure & Tourism Management, 21(1), 79–94. https://hrcak.srce.hr/140170
  48. Montecchia, A., Giordano, F. y Grieco, C. (2016). Communicating CSR: Integrated Approach or
  49. Selfie? Evidence from the Milan Stock Exchange. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 42–52.
  50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.099
  51. Muguerza, J. (1997). Ética, disenso y derechos humanos. Arjés.
  52. Nielsen, A. y Thomsen, C. (2009). Investigating CSR Communication in SMEs: a Case Study
  53. Among Danish Middle Managers. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), 83–93. https://doi.
  54. org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2009.01550.x
  55. Niño-Benavides, T. y Cortés, M. (2018). Strategic Communication and Corporate Social
  56. Responsibility Scenarios and Potentialities in the Creation of Social Capital: A Review of
  57. Literature. Prisma Social, 22, 128–158. https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/2570
  58. Oraee, M., Hosseini, R., Papadonikolaki, E., Palliyaguru, R.y Arashpour, M. (2017). Collaboration in
  59. BIM-Based Construction Networks: A Bibliometric-Qualitative Literature Review. International
  60. Journal of Project Management, 35(7), 1288–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.001
  61. Pérez, A. (2019). Building a Theoretical Framework of Message Authenticity in CSR Communication.
  62. Corporate Communications, 24(2), 334–50, https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2018-0051
  63. Perks, K., Farache, F., Shukla, P. y Berry, A. (2013). Communicating Responsibility-Practicing
  64. Irresponsibility in CSR Advertisements. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1881–1888. https://
  65. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.009
  66. Podnar, K. (2008). Guest Editorial: Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of
  67. Marketing Communications, 14(2), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527260701856350
  68. Robinson, S. y Eilert, M. (2018). The Role of Message Specificity in Corporate Social Responsibility
  69. Communication. Journal of Business Research, 90, 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
  70. jbusres.2018.05.028
  71. Robledo, S., Grisales, A., Hughes, M. y Eggers, F. (2021) “Hasta la vista, baby” – will Machine
  72. Learning Terminate Human Literature Reviews in Entrepreneurship? Journal of Small Business
  73. Management, https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955125
  74. Schultz, F., Castelló, I. y Morsing, M. (2013). The Construction of Corporate Social Responsibility
  75. in Network Societies: A Communication View. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 681–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1826-8
  76. Morsing, M. y Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Stakeholder Information, Response and Involvement Strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
  77. Skard, S. y Thorbjørnsen, H. (2014). Is Publicity Always Better than Advertising? The Role of Brand Reputation in Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1863-3
  78. Sohn, Y., Han, J. y Lee, S. (2012). Communication Strategies for Enhancing Perceived fit in the CSR Sponsorship Context. International Journal of Advertising, 31(1), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.2501/ija-31-1-133-146
  79. Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar
  80. la teoría fundamentada. Editorial Universidad de Antioquia.
  81. Thomas, J. y Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
  82. Torres, G., Robledo, S. y Rojas, S. (2021). Market Orientation: Importance, Evolution, and Emerging Approaches using Scientometric Analysis. Criterio Libre, 19(35), 326-340. https://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/criteriolibre/article/view/8371/7483
  83. Trejos-Salazar, D. F., Duque-Hurtado, P. L., Montoya-Restrepo, L. A. y Montoya-Restrepo, I. A. (2021). Neuroeconomía: una revisión basada en técnicas de mapeo científico. Revista de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, 11(2), 243-260. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v11.n2.2021.12754
  84. Vanhamme, J., Swaen, V., Berens, G. y Janssen, C. (2015). Playing with Fire: Aggravating and Buffering Effects of ex Ante CSR Communication Campaigns for Companies Facing Allegations of Social Irresponsibility. Marketing Letters, 26, 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9290-5
  85. Wong, J. y Dhanesh, G. (2017). Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the Luxury Industry. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(1), 88–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318916669602
  86. Weder, F., Einwiller, S. y Eberwein, T. (2019). Heading for New Shores: Impact Orientation of CSR Communication and the Need for Communicative Responsibility. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(2), 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-02-2019-0020
  87. Yekini, K., Omoteso, K. y Adegbite, E. (2021). CSR Communication Research: A Theoretical-cum-Methodological Perspective from Semiotics. Business & Society, 60(4), 876–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319843623
  88. Zhang, X. y Borden, J. (2017). Linking Issue Management, Corporate Social Responsibility and Crisis Communication: Applying Balance Theory in Crisis and Issue Management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 25(4), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12136
  89. Zuluaga-Rojas, M., Robledo-Giraldo, S., Osorio-Zuluaga, G., Yathe, L., González, D. y Taborda, G. (2016). Metabolomics and Pesticides: Systematic Literature Review Using Graph Theory for Analysis of References Metabolomics. Nova, 13(25), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.22490/24629448
Como Citar
Díez, D., Díaz-Ospina, J., Robledo, S., & Rodríguez-Córdoba, M. del P. (2022). Tendências teóricas e desafios na comunicação da responsabilidade social corporativa. Anagramas Rumbos Y Sentidos De La Comunicación, 20(40), 146-176. https://doi.org/10.22395/angr.v20n40a7

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

Estamos indexados em