Towards a 3D modeling of brain tumors by using endoneurosonography and neural networks

Andrés Serna | Bio
Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Manizales
Flavio Prieto | Bio
Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgeries have become popular because they reduce the typical risks of traditional interventions. In neurosurgery, recent trends suggest the combined use of endoscopy and ultrasound (endoneurosonography or ENS) for 3D virtualization of brain structures in real time. The ENS information can be used to generate 3D models of brain tumors during a surgery. This paper introduces a methodology for 3D modeling of brain tumors using ENS and unsupervised neural networks. The use of self-organizing maps (SOM) and neural gas networks (NGN) is particularly studied. Compared to other techniques, 3D modeling using neural networks offers advantages, since tumor morphology is directly encoded in synaptic weights of the network, no a priori knowledge is required, and the representation can be developed in two stages: off-line training and on-line adaptation. Experimental tests were performed using virtualized phantom brain tumors. At the end of the paper, the results of 3D modeling from an ENS database are presented.

References

[1] A. Di-leva, “Microtechnologies in neurosurgery,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, vol. 224, n.° 6, pp. 797–800, 2010.

[2] P. Ferroli et al., “Advanced 3-dimensional planning in neurosurgery,” Neurosurgery, vol. 72, n.° 1, pp. A54-A62, 2013.

[3] G.H. Barnett and N. Nathoo, “The modern brain tumor operating room: From standard essentials to current state-of-the-art,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 69, n.° 1, pp. 25-33, 2004.

[4] A.T. Stadie and R.A. Kockro, “Mono-stereo-autostereo: The evolution of 3-dimensional neurosurgical planning,” Neurosurgery, vol. 72, n.° 1, pp. A63-A77, 2013.

[5] K. Resch and J. Schroeder, “Endoneurosonography: technique and equipment, anatomy and imaging, and clinical application,” Neurosurgery, vol. 61, n.° 3, pp. 146-160, 2007.

[6] R. Machucho-Cadena et al., “Rendering of brain tumors using endoneurosonography,” In proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR2008), Tampa, Florida, 2008.

[7] A.F. Serna-Morales et al., “Acquisition of three-dimensional information of brain structures using endoneurosonography,” Expert systems with applications, vol. 39, n.° 2, pp. 1656-1670, 2012.

[8] R.P. Naftel et al., “Small-ventricle neuroendoscopy for pediatric brain tumor management: Clinical article,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, vol. 7, n.° 1, pp. 104-110, 2011.

[9] S. Constantini et al., “Safety and diagnostic accuracy of neuroendoscopic biopsies: An international multicenter study,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, vol. 1, n.° 6, pp. 704-709, 2013.

[10] M. Ivanov et al., “Intraoperative ultrasound in neurosurgery a practical guide,” British Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 24, n.° 5, pp. 510-517, 2010.

[11] G. Unsgaard et al., “Intra-operative 3D ultrasound in neurosurgery,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 148, n.° 3, pp. 235-253, 2006.

[12] J. Roth et al., “Real-time neuronavigation with high-quality 3D ultrasound sonowand,” Pediatric Neurosurgery, vol. 43, n.° 3, pp. 185-191, 2007.

[13] A.F. Serna-Morales et al., “Spatio-temporal image tracking based on optical flow and clustering: An endoneurosonographic application,” In 9th Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Pachuca, Mexico, 2010.

[14] N.H. Ulrich et al., “Resection of pediatric intracerebral tumors with the aid of intraoperative real-time 3-D ultrasound,” Child’s Nervous System, vol. 28, n.° 1, pp. 101-109, 2012.

[15] A. Burgess et al., “Focused ultrasound: Crossing barriers to treat alzheimer’s disease,” Therapeutic Delivery, vol. 2, n.° 3, pp. 281-286, 2011.

[16] K. Resch, Transendoscopic ultrasound for neurosurgery. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006, 148 p.

[17] A.F. Serna-Morales et al., “3D modeling of virtualized reality objects using neural computing,” In proceedings of the IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN2011), San Jose, 2011.

[18] F. Montoya-Franco et al., “3D object modeling with graphics hardware acceleration and unsupervised neural networks,” In Advances in Visual Computing: 7th International Symposium (ISVC 2011), Las Vegas, 2011.

[19] Richard-Wolf, “Endoscopy”, Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corporation, [on line], in http://www.richardwolfusa.com/company/about-us.html, 2013.

[20] N. Shi et al., “Research on k-means clustering algorithm: An improved k-means clustering algorithm,” In proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology and Security Informatics (IITSI2010), Jinggangshan, 2010.

[21] T. Hou, et al., “Despeckling medical ultrasound images based on an expectation maximization framework,” Acta Acustica, vol. 36, n.° 1, pp. 73-80, 2011.

[22] Aloka co. Ultrasound Diagnostic Equipment ALOKA SSD-5000. Mure 6-chome, Mitaka-Shi, Tokyo 181-8622, Japan, mN1-1102 Rev. 9, 2002.

[23] S. Marquez et al., “Characterization of ultrasound images of HIFU-induced lesions by extraction of its morphological properties,” In proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE2010), Mexico, 2010.

[24] Q. Zhang et al., “Automatic segmentation of calcifications in intra-vascular ultrasound images using snakes and the contourlet transform,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 36, n.° 1, pp. 111–129, 2010.

[25] O. Michailovich and A. Tannenbaum, “Despeckling of medical ultrasound images,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 53, n.° 1, pp. 64-78, 2006.

[26] T.M. Martinetz et al., “‘Neural-gas’ network for vector quantization and its application to time-series prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 4, n.° 4, pp. 558–569, 1993.

[27] M. Piastra, “Self-organizing adaptive map: Autonomous learning of curves and surfaces from point samples,” Neural Networks, vol. 41, pp. 96-112, 2013.

[28] T. Kohonen et al., “On the quantization error in SOM vs. VQ: A critical and systematic study”. In Advances in Self-Organizing Maps. Santiago, 2009.

[29] M.H. Ghaseminezhad and A. Karami, “A novel self-organizing map (SOM) neural network for discrete groups of data clustering,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 11, n.° 4, pp. 3771-3778, 2011.

[30] M. Letteboer et al., “Brain shift estimation in image–guided neurosurgery using 3D ultrasound,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 52, n.° 2, pp. 268-276, 2005.

[31] I. Chen et al., “Intraoperative brain shift compensation: Accounting for dural septa,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 58, n.° 3, pp. 499-508, 2011.

[32] T. Hartkens et al., “Measurement and analysis of brain deformation during neurosurgery,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 22, n.° 1, pp. 82-92, 2003.

[33] C. Maurer et al., “Measurement of intra-operative brain surface deformation under a cranioto y,” In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Interventation (MICCAI98), Cambridge, USA, 1998.
How to Cite
Serna, A., & Prieto, F. (2017). Towards a 3D modeling of brain tumors by using endoneurosonography and neural networks. Revista Ingenierías Universidad De Medellín, 16(30), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.22395/rium.v16n30a7

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

We are indexed in