Empowerment of Plus-Size Women Influencers: Challenges and Social Change on social media
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study explores the intrinsic motivations of plus-size women influencers on social media, analyzing their role in promoting body acceptance and empowerment. In a context dominated by beauty standards that exclude body diversity, these influencers emerge as agents of change by challenging stereotypes and fostering more inclusive representation. This research is relevant given the limited literature on their social and commercial impact, despite their growing influence in fashion and digital marketing. An exploratory qualitative approach was adopted, based on 13 semi-structured interviews with plus-size Ibero-American women influencers on Instagram. Data analysis was conducted using an inductive coding process following grounded theory. Results are interpreted through Zimmerman's psychological empowerment model. In an intrapersonal dimension, participants demonstrate strengthened self-esteem and high self-efficacy, derived from creating positive content. In an interactional dimension, they build meaningful connections with their communities, fostering identification and support. Finally, in a behavioral dimension, their actions drive concrete social changes, such as increasing the visibility of non-normative bodies, challenging fatphobia, and collaborating with inclusive brands. In conclusion, these influencers not only act as role models for diverse body representation but also transform social perceptions of beauty and fashion, establishing themselves as key figures in the fight for diversity and inclusion in cultural and commercial industries.
Article Details
How to Cite
References
Audrezet, A., De Kerviler, G., & Moulard, J. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008
Afful, A., & Ricciardelli, R. (2015). Shaping the online fat acceptance movement: Talking about body image and beauty standards. Journal of Gender Studies, 24, 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1028523
Aw, E. C. X., & Agnihotri, R. (2024). Influencer marketing research: review and future research agenda. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 32(4), 435-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2023.2235883
Bandura, A. (1978). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1(4), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4
Christino, J. M. M., Paula, G. R., & Ferreira, F. L. (2023). Consumption of plus-size clothing: a systematic review. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 16(4), e2. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465973849
Cho, Y. N., Taylor, C. R., & Panteqi, M. (2025). The Interplay of Mind and Body: The Impact of Influencers' Body Size and Motivation Appeals. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 49(2), e70030. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70030
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, publications. (4th ed.), Newbury Park, CA.
Corradini, E. (2023). The dark threads that weave the web of shame: A network science-inspired analysis of body shaming on Reddit. Information, 14(8), 436.
Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Duthely, R. M. (2022). Plus-size fashion influencers and disruptive black bodies. Social Media + Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221107642
Eisenhardt, K., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
Fadda, M., Galimberti, E., Romanò, L., Faccini, M., Senatore, S., Zanetti, A. (2017). Validation of a scale to measure parental psychological empowerment in the vaccination decision. Journal of Public Health Research, 6(2), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2017.955
Falgoust, G., Winterlind, E., Moon, P., Parker, A., Zinzow, H., & Madathil, K. (2022). Applying the uses and gratifications theory to identify motivational factors behind young adult's participation in viral social media challenges on TikTok. Human Factors in Healthcare, 2, 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hfh.2022.100014
García Mata, D. C., & Villanueva Valadez, C. (2024). Representación de género femenino en Facebook: estereotipos y comunicación digital en publicaciones virtuales. Anagramas-Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación-, 23(45). https://doi.org/10.22395/angr.v23n45a12
Gomez-Borquez, C. L., A. Török, E. Centeno-Velázquez, and E. Malota. (2024). Female Stereotypes and Female Empowerment in Advertising: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies 48, (2), https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.13010
Grabe, S., Ward, L., & Hyde, J. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: a meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 460. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.460
Guiñez-Cabrera, N., Mansilla-Obando, K., & Jeldes-Delgado, F. (2020). La transparencia publicitaria en los influencers de las redes sociales. RETOS. Revista de Ciencias de la Administración y Economía, 10(20), 265-281. https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n20.2020.05
Halliwell, E., & Dittmar, H. (2004). Does size matter? The impact of model's body size on women's body-focused anxiety and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(1), 104-122. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.1.104.26989
Han, J., & Balabanis, G. (2024). Meta‐analysis of social media influencer impact: Key antecedents and theoretical foundations. Psychology & Marketing, 41(2), 394-426. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21927
Hudders, L., & Lou, C. (2022). A new era of influencer marketing: Lessons from Recent Inquires and Thoughts on Future Directions. International Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2022.2031729
Hynnä, K., & Kyrölä, K. (2019). “Feel in your body”: Fat activist affects in blogs. Social Media + Society, 5(4), 2056305119879983. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119879983
Lamberton, C., & Stephen, A. (2016). A thematic exploration of digital, social media, and mobile marketing: Research evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an agenda for future inquiry. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 146–172. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0415
Leung, L. (2009). User-generated content on the internet: an examination of gratifications, civic engagement and psychological empowerment. New Media & Society, 11(8), 1327-1347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341264
Li, Z. (2016). Psychological empowerment on social media: who are the empowered users?. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.09.001
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New directions for program evaluation, 1986(30), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427
Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501
Menon, S. (2001). Employee empowerment: An integrative psychological approach. Applied psychology, 50(1), 153-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00052
McCracken, G. (1988). Qualitative research methods series: The long interview. Sage publications, Newbury Park, CA.
Olmedo, R.; García, C. (2023). Influencers y etiquetado frontal en México. Aproximaciones desde la campaña #ParaVariar de Sidral Mundet. ZER: Revista De Estudios De Comunicación = Komunikazio Ikasketen Aldizkaria, 28(55), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.1387/zer.24938
Patton, M. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage, publications. (4th ed.), Thousand Oaks.
Qayyum, A., Jamil, R. A., Shah, A., & Lee, K. (2023). Inclusive advertising featuring disability on Instagram: Effect on consumer well-being, brand engagement, and purchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, 103515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103515
Reinecke, J., Arnold, D., & Palazzo, G. (2016). Qualitative methods in business ethics, corporate responsibility, and sustainability research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(4), xiii-xxii. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.67
Scaraboto, D., & Fischer, E. (2013). Frustrated fatshionistas: An institutional theory perspective on consumer quests for greater choice in mainstream markets. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1234-1257. https://doi.org/10.1086/668298
Shamim, K., Azam, M., & Islam, T. (2024). How do social media influencers induce the urge to buy impulsively? Social commerce context. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 77, 103621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103621
Statista (2024). “Instagram - statistics & facts” https://www.statista.com/topics/1882/instagram/#topicOverview
Taylor, C., Cho, Y., Anthony, C., & Smith, D. (2018). Photoshopping of models in advertising: A review of the literature and future research agenda. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 9(4), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2018.1511380
Yang, M. (2024). Unpacking the Plus-Size Travel Movement. Journal of Travel Research, 63(7), 1817-1834. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231195740
Zeithaml, V., Jaworski, B., Kohli, A., Tuli, K., Ulaga, W., & Zaltman, G. (2020). A theories-in-use approach to building marketing theory. Journal of Marketing, 84(1), 32-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919888477
Zimmerman, M. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43-63). Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6-2
Zimmerman, M. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506983
