Seeking stakeholders: responsibility and effectiveness as values in letters from CEOS in the CSR reports in Chile

Pablo Matus | Bio

Abstract

This paper shows part of the results of a study on the rhetorical use of values in the communication of corporate social responsibility in Chile: In particular, an analysis of the discourse applied to the letters from Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) which were included in the reports of the ten companies that led the Corporate Sustainability Ranking, prepared in 2017 by the Prohumana Foundation. To face this challenge, a model of rhetorical - communicational analysis that considers argumentation principles by values was elaborated (Perelman and Olbrechts - Tyteca, 1994, Bellenger, 1992).The results show that the letters are addressed to a particular audience (the stakeholders), that they are hybrid rhetorical expressions (of judicial and epidictic nature), and that specific values, such as responsibility and effectiveness, prevail in them. These values pretend to logically and ethically sustain the companies’ argument or story, implying a level of agreement: The reader is committed not to discuss or deny himself in the existence of the validity of values and, from that perspective, he aspires to eliminate resistance or criticism of financial, environmental and social management. In this sense, the premise that sustainability reports are representative texts of corporate identity and strategies is confirmed.

References

Acción RSE. (2014). Análisis de reportes de sostenibilidad 2013: aproximaciones a la gestión de RSE en Chile. Recuperado de http://www.accionempresas.cl/docs/estudios/1812115036_Reportabilidad_PARA_WEB.pdf.

Aristóteles. (1999). Retórica (introducción, traducción y notas por Quintín Racionero). Madrid, España: Gredos.

Austin, J. (1990). Cómo hacer cosas con palabras. Barcelona, España: Paidós Ibérica.

Banco Santander. Chile. (2017). Informe anual 2016. Recuperado de https://www.santander.cl/nuestro_banco/pdf/Memoria_Financiera_Banco_Santander_2016.pdf.

Bellenger, L. (1992). L’argumentation: principes et méthodes (4a ed.). París, Francia: ESF.

Beristáin, H. (1995). Diccionario de retórica y poética (7a ed.). Ciudad de México, México: Porrúa.

Breeze, R. (2013). Corporate discourse. Londres, Inglaterra: Bloomsbury.

Brown, H. S., de Jong, M. y Levy, D. L. (2009). Building institutions based on information disclosure: Lessons from GRI’s sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(6), 571 - 580.

Brown, H. S., de Jong, M. y Lessidrenska, T. (2009). The rise of the Global Reporting Initiative: A case of institutional entrepreneurship. Environmental Politics, 18(2), 182 - 200.

Browne, V. P. (2010). Características de la cobertura informativa de la responsabilidad social empresarial en la prensa chilena. Cuadernos Info, (27), 123 - 135.

Castelló, I. y Lozano, J.M. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 11 - 29.

Cornelissen, J. (2004). Corporate communications. Theory and practice. Londres: Sage.

Davidson, K. M. (2011). Reporting systems for sustainability: What are they measuring? Social Indicators Research, 100(2), 351 - 365.

Derkxa, B. y Glasbergen, P. (2014). Elaborating global private meta - governance: An inventory in the realm of voluntary sustainability standards. Global Environmental Change, 27, 41 - 50.

Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Isla Gabriola: New Society.

Essbio. (2017). Memoria 2017. Recuperado de https://www.essbio.cl/reporte-sostenibilidad

Falabella Retail. (2015). Reporte 2015: Sostenibilidad Falabella Retail. Recuperado de https://www.unglobalcompact.org/system/attachments/cop_2017/355221/original/REPORTE_VERSION_FINAL_OFICIAL.pdf?1484923817

Global Reporting Initiative. (2013). G4 Sustainability reporting guidelines: Reporting principles and standard disclosures. Recuperado de https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/grig4-part1-reporting-principles-and-standard-disclosures.pdf

GNL Mejillones. (2017). Reporte de sustentabilidad 2016. Recuperado de https://issuu.com/gnlmejillones/docs/reporte_sustentabilidad_gnlm_br

GNL Quintero. (2017). Reporte de sostenibilidad 2016. Recuperado de https://issuu.com/gnlquintero/docs/reporte_de_sostenabilidad_gnlq_2016_6a0721c359ec31

Heath, R. L. (2001). A rhetorical enactment rationale for public relations: The good organization communicating well. En R. L. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 31 - 50). California, Estados Unidos: Sage.

Heath, R. L. (2008). Rhetorical theory, public relations, and meaning: Giving voice to ideas. In T. L. Hansen - Horn y B. D. Neff (Eds.), Public relations: From theory to practice (pp. 208 - 226). Boston, Estados Unidos: Pearson.

Heath R.L. y Frandsen F. (2008) Rhetorical perspective and public relations: Meaning matters. En: A. Zerfass, B. van Ruler y K. Sriramesh (Eds.), Public relations research (pp. 349 - 364). Wiesbaden, Alemania: GWV Fachverlage.

Hernández, J. A. y García, M. (1994). Historia breve de la retórica. Madrid, España: Síntesis

Humphreys, M. y Brown, A. (2008). An analysis of corporate social responsibility at Credit Line: A narrative approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(3), 403 - 418.

Jumbo. (2017). Alimentando la sostenibilidad. Reporte de sostenibilidad 2016. Recuperado de https://www.jumbosostenible.cl/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/reporte - sostenibilidad - jumbo - 2016.pdf.

L’Oreal. (2017). Sharing beauty with all. 2016 progress report. Recuperado de https://www.lorealfinance.com/_docs/0000000138/LOreal_2016_Progress_Report.pdf

Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 253–261.

Leszczynska, A. (2012). Towards shareholders’ value: An analysis of sustainability reports. Industrial Management + Data Systems, 112(6), 911 - 928.

Lyons, J. (1984). Introducción al lenguaje y a la lingüística. Barcelona, España: Teide.

Mall Plaza. (2017). Reporte de sostenibilidad Mall Plaza 2016. Recuperado de http://www.mallplaza.com/files/REPORTE_SOSTENIBILIDAD_2016_FINAL.pdf

Marafioti, R. (2003). Los patrones de la argumentación. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Biblos.

Martin, B. y Ringham, F. (2000). Dictionary of semiotics. Londres, Inglaterra: Cassell.

Mejri, M. y de Wolf, D. (2012). Analysis of retailers’ communication approaches in sustainability and social responsibility reports. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 4(2), 30 - 44.

Moneva, J. M., Archel, P. y Correa, C. (2006). GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. Accounting Forum, 30(2), 121 - 137.

Morandé, P. (2005). Bases conceptuales para el estudio de la responsabilidad social de la empresa. Abante, 8(2), 3 - 36.

Organización de Naciones Unidas. (1987). Report of the World Comission on Environment and Development. Recuperado de www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf.

Organización de Naciones Unidas. (2014). Guide to corporate sustainability. Shaping a sustainable future. Recuperado de https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/publications/UN_Global_Compact_Guide_to_Corporate_Sustainability.pdf

París. (2017). Reporte conciencia celeste. Informe de sostenibilidad París 2016. Recuperado de https://imagenes.paris.cl/is/content/Cencosud/Paris/PDF%20ficha/REPORTE%20PARIS%202016.pdf

Perelman, C. y Olbrechts - Tyteca, L. (1994). Tratado de la argumentación. La nueva retórica. Madrid, España: Gredos.

Pérez, M. y Vega, O. (2002). Enseñanza del discurso argumentativo. La argumentación por valores. Onomázein, (7), 403 - 411.

Prohumana. (2017). Ranking de sustentabilidad empresarial Prohumana: modelo de estrategia de negocio sustentable. Recuperado de http://www.prohumana.cl/ranking_sustentabilidad_empresarial/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Metodolog%C3%ADa-PROhumana-2017.pdf.

Retamal, L. y Matus, P. (2018, junio). Relacionamiento de empresas generadoras de electricidad en Chile y sus stakeholders: Un análisis a partir de reportes de RSE. Trabajo presentado en el I Congreso Internacional de Comunicación para la Sostenibilidad, Cuenca, Ecuador.

Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A. y Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937 - 967.

Tironi, E. y Cavallo, A. (2007). Comunicación estratégica. Vivir en un mundo de señales. Santiago de Chile: Taurus.

Transelec. (2017). Reporte de sostenibilidad 2016. Recuperado de http://www.transelec.cl/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/reporte-transelec-2016-1.pdf

Van Riel, C. (1997). Comunicación corporativa. Madrid, España: Pearson Educación.

Vigneau, L., Humphreys, M. y Moon, J. (2015). How do firms comply with international sustainability standards? Processes and consequences of adopting the Global Reporting Initiative. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(2), 469 - 486.

World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2015). Reporting matters, América Latina. Mejorando la efectividad del reporte. Recuperado de http://deres.org.uy/wp-content/uploads/WBCSD-ReportingMatters_LA.pdf

World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2016). Reporting matters. Communicating on the Sustainable Development Goals. Recuperado de https://www.wbcsd.org/Programs/Redefining-Value/External-Disclosure/Reporting-matters/Resources/Reporting-Matters-2016

Zhang, J. y Swanson, D. (2006). Analysis of news media’s representation of corporate social responsibility. Public Relations Quarterly, 51(2), 3 - 17.
How to Cite
Matus, P. (2018). Seeking stakeholders: responsibility and effectiveness as values in letters from CEOS in the CSR reports in Chile. Anagramas Rumbos Y Sentidos De La Comunicación, 17(33), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.22395/angr.v17n33a2

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

We are indexed in