Advance Search

Educational Foundations for the Creation and Production of Open Access Educational Resources (REA)

Alexandra Gómez Marín | Bio
Universidad de Medellín
Edilberto Restrepo Restrepo | Bio
Universidad de Medellín
Ricardo Andres Becerra Agudelo | Bio
Universidad de Medellín
Keywords:
Copyright and Licensing:

Copyright (c) 2023 Anagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This article is the result of a research of the Model for the co-creation and production of open educational contents through a virtual platform (Modelo para la cocreación y producción de contenidos educativos abiertos mediante el uso de una plataforma virtual) This model aims towards making a contribution in the strengthening of digital education in the department of Antioquia. The goal of this research was implementing a model for the co-creation and production of open educational contents, REA in Spanish, through the use of a virtual platform. This model, that is the main product of this research, is restricted within three main components: educational, production and technologic, which are aligned through autonomy, interaction, flexibility and mediation as transversal principles that encompasses the creation of open educational contents. The fundamental purpose of this research is promoting an education in which the teaching-studying processes are improved through the REA by making use of technology and the elements necessary for making more productive and efficient contents. At the same time, the study aims to implement its distribution under licenses that allow its re-use, adaptation and transformation without intellectual property restrictions. The educational component, in which an emphasis is made in this article, emerges from the analysis of different theories, strategies and methodologies for teaching and learning that are used in mediated technology through information and communication (CIT). This component of the model is fundamented in connectivism as a learning theory that bases the creation processes of open educational resources. 

PDF (Español)
PDF (Español)

References

  1. Arango, S y Manrique, B. (2020, 27 de junio). Virtual Platform for the Institución Universitaria Digital de Antioquia-Colombia [ponencia] 15th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Sevilla, España. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9141066
  2. Boaden, R. (2006). Leadership development: does it make a difference? Leadership & Organization Developement Journal, 27(1), 5-27. https://www.researchgate.net/ublication/235250453_Leadership_development_Does_it_make_a_difference
  3. Bonwell, C. C. y Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). The George Washington University.
  4. Bottorff, J. y Morse J. (2003). Asuntos críticos en los métodos de investigación cualitativa. Universidad de Antioquia. Bowerman, J. (2003). Leadership development through action learning: an executive monograph. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 16(4), 6-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13660750310500049
  5. Bueno, J. A. (2007). Propuesta metodológica para la implementación de una estrategia e-training. Gerencia de Tecnologías de Información, 6(16). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/230227198.pdf
  6. Chatti, M. A., Agustiawan, M. R., Jarke, M. y Specht, M. (2010). Toward a personal learning environment framework. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 1(4), 66-85. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/522d/6200a97357a345a39f95da0910e6d186ed2d.pdf
  7. Cloete, L. (2012). Combining E-learning and M-learning: new applications of blended educational resources. Online information review, 36(2), 321-322. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521211240153
  8. Conger, J. y Toegel, G. (2002). Action learning and multi-rater feedback as leadership development interventions: Popular but poorly deployed. Journal of Change Management, 3(4), 332-348. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233679749
  9. Cornide-Reyes, Héctor C., y Villarroel, Rodolfo H. (2019). Método para Promover el Aprendizaje Colaborativo en Ingeniería de Software. Formación universitaria, 12(4), 3-12. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062019000400003
  10. Díaz, J. L., Leal, C. y García, J. A. (2014). Metodología de autoaprendizaje en entornos simulados (MAES). Evidentia, 11, pp. 1-6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303231958_Metodologia_de_autoaprendizaje_en_entornos_simulados_MAESC
  11. Díaz, M. (2002). Flexibilidad y educación superior en Colombia. Icfes (1ª ed.). Downes, S. (2007, 3 de febrero). What Connectivism is. https://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2007/02/what-connectivism-is.html
  12. Freeman, S.,Sarah, L., McDonough, M., Michelle, K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt. H., y Wenderoth, M. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science. Engineering. And mathematics. Psychological and cognitive sciences. Ed.Bruce Alberts, Univ. Califormina.
  13. Gadamer, H. G. (1992). Verdad y método II. Ediciones Sígueme.
  14. Gairín, J. (2006). Las comunidades virtuales de aprendizaje. Educar, (37). 41-64.
  15. Galeano, M. (2004). Diseño de proyectos en la investigación cualitativa. Fondo Editorial Universidad Eafit.
  16. Gil-Galván, R. (2018). El uso del aprendizaje basado en problemas en la enseñanza universitaria. Análisis de las competencias adquiridas y su impacto. Revista mexicana de investigación educativa, 23(76), 73-93. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=14054854004
  17. González, E. (2006). Sobre la hermenéutica o acerca de las múltiples lecturas de lo real. Sello Editorial Universidad de Medellín.
  18. Gros, B. y Kinshuk Maina, M. (2016). The Future of Ubiquitous Learning: Learning Desings for Emerging Pedagogies. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. The Future of ubiquitous Computing. Springer International Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3
  19. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. y Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. The George Washington University.
  20. Kagan, S. (1985). Cooperative learning resources for teachers. University of California. Kasprisin, C. A., Single, P. B., Single, R. M. y Muller, C. B. (2003). Building a Better Bridge: testing e-training to improve e-mentoring programmes in higher education. Mentoring & Tutoring, 1 (11). https://doi.org/10.1080/1361126032000054817
  21. Kavadella, A., Tsiklakis, K., Vougiouklakis, G. y Lionarakos, A. (2012). Evaluation of a blended learning course for teaching oral radiology to undergraduate dental students. Eur J Dent Educ, (16), 88-95. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22251359/
  22. Labrador, M. y Andreu, M. (2008). Metodologías activas. Grupo de innovación en Metodologías Activas. Ediciones Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. http://www.upv.es/diaal/publicaciones/Andreu-Labrador12008_Libro%20Metodologias_Activas.pdf
  23. Martín, S., Gil, R., Díaz, G., Sancristobal, E., Castro, M. y Peire, J., (2008,15 de octubre). From elearning to m-learning through b-learning and s-learning. 50th International Symposium Elmar, Zadar, 341-344. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224370701_From_e-learning_to_m-learning_through_b-learning_and_s-learning
  24. Martínez, I., Martínez, B., Alonso-Sáez, I. y Gezuraga, M. (2013). El Aprendizaje-Servicio en la innovación universitaria. Una experiencia realizada en la formación de educadoras y educadores sociales. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social, 2, 195-216. https://revistas.uam.es/riejs/article/view/379
  25. Mayorga, M. y Madrid, D. (2010). Modelos didácticos y Estrategias de enseñanza en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. Tendencias Pedagógicas 15(1). https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/3221568.pdf
  26. Mcgrath, D. (2002). Teaching on the front lines: using the internet and problem-based learning to enhance classroom teaching. Holist Nurs Pract, 16(2), 5-13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11515061
  27. Michaelsen, K., Davidson, N. y Major, C. (2014). Team Based Learning Practices and Principles in Comparison with Cooperative Learning and Problem Based Learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 25(3 y 4), 57-84. https://www.lhthompson.com/uploads/4/2/1/1/42117203/team_based_learning_-_group_work.pdf
  28. Mikroyannidis, A. (2012). A Semantic Framework for Cloud Learning Environments. In Chao, L. (Eds.), Cloud Computing for Teaching and Learning: Strategies for Design and Implementation (pp.17-31). IGI Global. http://doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-0957-0.ch002
  29. Pahinis, K., Stokes, C. W., Walsh, T. F., Tsitrou, E. y Cannavina, G. A. (2008). Blended learning course taught to different groups of learners in a dental school: Follow-up evaluation. J Dent Educ., 72(9), 57-1048. 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2008.72.9.tb04579.x
  30. Paredes, D. (2019). Dimensiones pedagógicas que configuran las prácticas de aprendizaje-servicio. Páginas de Educación, 12(2), 23-42. https://dx.doi.org/10.22235/pe.v12i2.1834
  31. Park, S., Kim, K. y Lee, B. (2011). Developing english learning contents for mobile smart devices. Future Information Technology, 185, 264-271. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-22309-9_32
  32. Prieto, J. (2013). Una aproximación metodológica al uso de redes sociales en ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje, para el fortalecimiento de las competencias transversales de la Universidad EAN. Revista Virtu@lmente, 1(1), 25-31. https://journal.universidadean.edu.co/index.php/vir/article/view/1397
  33. Reyes-Torres, G., Saavedra, J. y Aguayo-Vergara, M. (2020). Aprendizaje basado en equipos en un curso de Ingeniería en Educación Superior. Revista Educación, 44(1), pp. 257-276. https://dx.doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v44i1.38316
  34. Rué, J. (2007). Enseñar en la universidad. El EEES como reto para la educación superior. Narcea. Schneider, E., Froze, I., Rolon, V., y Mara de Almeida, C. (2013). Sala de Aula Invertida. En EAD: Uma proposta de Blended Learning. Revista Intersaberes, 8(16), 68-81. https://www.uninter.com/intersaberes/index.php/revista/article/view/499
  35. Siemens, G. (2006). Conectivism: learning and knowledge today. http://www.mmiweb.org.uk/egyptianteachers/site/downloads/Siemens_2006.pdf
  36. Siemens, G. (2008). A learning theory for the digital age. https://www.academia.edu/2857237/Connectivism_a_learning_theory_for_the_digital_age
  37. Single, P. B. y Muller, C. B. (2001). When e-mail and mentoring unite: The implementation of a nationwide electronic mentoring program, in: L. Stromei (ed.) Creating Mentoring and Coaching Programs (pp.107-121). American Society for Training and Development in Action Series.
  38. Unesco. (Octubre de 2002). La educación superior en el siglo XXI: visión y acción. Presentada en la Conferencia Mundial sobre la Educación Superior en el Siglo XXI, en París. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000116345_spa
  39. Vásquez, C., Ricaurte, A. y Arango, S., (2009). Interacciones comunicativas en un entorno virtual de aprendizaje. Revista Virtual Universidad Católica del Norte, 28.
How to Cite
Gómez Marín, A., Restrepo Restrepo, E., & Becerra Agudelo, R. A. (2021). Educational Foundations for the Creation and Production of Open Access Educational Resources (REA). Anagramas Rumbos Y Sentidos De La Comunicación, 19(38), 35-68. https://doi.org/10.22395/angr.v19n38a3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel

We are indexed in