Regionalization under Dispute: A Critical Analysis of Ancine’s Financial Arrangements Allocation
Article Sidebar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Total or partial reproduction of the contents of the journal are authorized for educational, investigative or academic purposes as long as the source is cited. In order to make reproductions for other purposes, it is necessary to have the express authorization of the imprint or Sello Editorial of the Universidad de Medellín.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article presents the results of a research study guided by the following question: how has Brazil implemented resource decentralization policies to foster audiovisual production across the country? The investigation examined resource decentralization initiatives through the outcomes of the four public calls of Ancine’s State and Regional Financial Allocation Program (2014-2018) and additional data obtained via the Law on Access to Information. The analysis was conducted using tools from the Political Economy of Communications, intercultural studies, and historical institutionalism applied to the study of communication policies. Findings reveal that these policies strengthen local markets and drive new economic agents. However, investments remain concentrated in the Southeast region, with other regions, particularly the North, still marginalized. It was also identified that the mechanism relies heavily on local initiative and faces obstacles such as: (i) a lack of understanding of Ancine’s operations, (ii) limited resources, and (iii) insufficient comprehension of the sector’s economic dynamics. Despite advances in the Northeast, the model under analysis is insufficient to challenge the hegemony of traditionally favored territories or the influence of large conglomerates. This study contributes to both academic scholarship and the development of public policies in Brazil’s audiovisual sector by examining the processes that govern funding allocation and reflecting on the need to improve these mechanisms for a more equitable distribution of resources.
Article Details
References
Abrucio, F. L. (2005). A coordenação federativa no Brasil: A experiência do período fhc e os desafios do governo Lula. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 24, 41-67. https://doi.org/10.1590/ S0104-44782005000100005
Agência Nacional do Cinema – Ancine – (n. d.). Editais do fomento. Recuperado em 15 de abril, 2024. https://antigo.ancine.gov.br/pt-br/fomento/editais-fomento/
Azulay, J. (2007). Por uma política cinematográfica brasileira para o século xxi. In A. Meleiro (Ed.), Cinema no mundo: Indústria política e mercado América Latina (vol. ii, pp. 65-97). Escrituras Editora.
Bahia, L. (2012). Discursos, políticas e ações: processos de industrialização do campo cinematográfico brasileiro. Iluminuras.
BARBALHO, Alexandre. Politica Cultural. In Rubim, Linda (org.). Organização e produção da cultura. Salvador, edufba, 2005, p.33–52.
Botelho, I. (2007). Políticas culturais: discutindo pressupostos. In G. Nussbaumer (Ed.), Teorias e políticas da cultura: visões multidisciplinares (pp. 171-180). edufba.
Carvalho, C. A. (2009). O estado e a participação conquistada no campo das políticas públicas para a cultura no Brasil. In L. Calabre (Ed.), Políticas culturais: reflexões e ações. Itaú Cultural, Fundação Casa de Rui Barbosa.
Costa, M. R. (2017). Cinema brasileiro independente no contexto contemporâneo: entre a ficção e a realidade. [Tese de doutorado]. ufrj https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/ trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=5020447
Domingues, J. (2021). O espectro autoritário: Como a concentração de mídia fragiliza a democracia. Appris Editora.
Elster, J. (1994). Peças e engrenagens das ciências sociais. Relume-Dumará.
Gatti, A. (2007). O mercado cinematográfico brasileiro: Uma situação global? In A. Meleiro (Ed.), Cinema no mundo: indústria política e mercado - América Latina (vol. ii, pp. 101-142). Escrituras Editora.
González-Iglesias, J. D., & Toda, F. (2011). Dubbing or subtitling interculturalism: Choices and constraints. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 11(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc. v11i1.521
Hracs, B. J. (2015). Cultural intermediaries in the digital age: The case of independent musicians and managers in Toronto. Regional Studies, 49(3), 461-475. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.750425
IKEDA, M. (2012). Lei da Ancine comentada (Medida Provisória nº 2.228-1/01). SET Multimídia
Ikeda, M. (2015). Cinema brasileiro a partir da retomada: Aspectos econômicos e políticos. Summus Editorial.
Jambeiro Barbosa, O. F., De Morais, K. S., Canesso, N. S., Domingues Da Silva, J. M., & Evangelista,M. S. (2023). Audiovisual production in Brazil: Will its public support survive the new political scenario? Media, Culture & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437231168309
Kelly, M. (2009). A third space for Europe: Intercultural communication in European language policy. European Journal of Language Policy, 1(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3828/EJLP.1.1.2
Lehman, C. M., & Taylor, G. S. (1994). A role-playing exercise for analyzing intercultural communication. The Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 57(2), 23-32. https:// doi.org/10.1177/108056999405700203
Lei no 11.437. (2006). Lei Nº 11.437, de 28 de dezembro de 2006. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2006/lei/l11437.htm
Mahoney, J. (2021). The logic of social science. Princeton University Press.
Mahoney, J. L., Kimball, E., & Koivu, K. L. (2009). The logic of historical explanation in the social sciences. Comparative Political Studies, 42(1), 114-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414008325433
Melnyk, N., & Kapeliushna, T. (2020). Providing and implementation of intercultural communication in European documents. Studies in Comparative Education, (2), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.31499/2306-5532.2.2020.221987
Morais, K. (2016). A política de fomento ao audiovisual no Brasil e o lugar da tv. Revista Eletrônica Internacional de Economia Política da Informação, da Comunicação e da Cultura, 18(2), 65-85. https:// periodicos.ufs.br/eptic/article/view/5216
Morais, K. (2020). Audiovisual independente: Política de fomento e organização das produtoras no Brasil. eduneb. https://doi.org/10.7476/9786588211298
Mosco, V. (2009). The political economy of communication (2nd ed.). sage.
Murdock, G. (2005). Continental shifts: Capitalism, communications and change in Europe.
Comunicação & Sociedade, 7, 11-23. https://doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.7(2005).1207
Observatório do Cinema e do Audiovisual –oca – (n. d.). Dados abertos. https://www.gov.br/ancine/pt-br/oca/dados-abertos
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton University Press.
Sarikakis, K., & Ganter, S. (2014). Priorities in global media policy transfer: Audiovisual and digital policy mutations in the eu, mercosur and us triangle. European Journal of Communication, 29(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113509360
Souza, C. (2006). Políticas públicas: Uma revisão da literatura. Sociologias, 20-45. https://doi. org/10.1590/S1517-45222006000200003
Steinmo, S., Thelen, K., & Longstreth, F. (Eds.). (1992). Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 369-404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369
Wasko, J. (2006). La economía política del cine. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, 11, 95-110.
Wasko, J., Murdock, G., & Sousa, H. (Eds.). (2011). The political economy of communications: Core concerns and issues. Wiley-Blackwell.