Motivation for the Search for Digital Health Information by a Quilombola Community

Raquel Marques Carriço Ferreira | Bio
Universidade Federal de Sergipe
Roseli Pereira Nunes Bastos | Bio
Universidade Federal de Sergipe
José Nailto dos Santos | Bio
Universidade Federal de Sergipe

Abstract

With a qualitative inductive study operated by the method of grounded theory (GT), observing the Uses and Gratifications framework for the consumption of digital platforms, we seek in this article to present empirical findings about the reasons that contribute to the search and consumption of information digital health, by Quilombola remnants of the Bairro Porto D’Áreia community, municipality of Estância, Sergipe. Here, we describe a clipping focused on the perspective of the motivation “caring for oneself and for the other”, in which we privilege the description of the need to understand information that identifies and diagnoses symptoms, origin of diseases, therapies, and medicines, and that encourages “taken decision-making about selfcare and the health of those closest to you”. With twelve in-depth interviews carried out, we report here the experiences of this group, which survives on the fringes of structures such as basic sanitation, balanced nutrition, areas of sports, education, culture, and hospital medical care. These subjects demand health care and maintain contact with digital technologies, so it is necessary to understand how they deal with and decide on health from this source of information. In this area, here we unveil the main experiences reported, motivations based on the subjects’ respective ability to choose, since the structuring conditions of the community end up modulating their daily practices regarding health. As a result, we observed among the interviewees that the search for self-care is related to self-diagnosis, medication use, adoption of treatments and preventive care practices for the elderly and children.

References

  1. Ala-Mutka, K. (2011). Mapping Digital Competence: Towards a Conceptual Understanding. JRC Technical Notes. Retrieved October 2, 2020, from http://www.dctest.org/uploads/6/8/7/0/68701431/jrc67075_tn.pdf
  2. Benigeri, M. (2003). Shortcomings of health information on the Internet. Health Promotion International, 18(4), 381–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dag409
  3. Bessell, T. L. (2003). Surfing, self-medicating and safety: buying non-prescription and complementary medicines via the internet. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 12(2), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.2.88
  4. Boyer, E. W., Shannon, M., & Hibberd, P. L. (2005). The Internet and Psychoactive Substance Use Among Innovative Drug Users. Pediatrics, 115(2), 302–305. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-1199
  5. Carvalho, A. I. (2013). Determinantes sociais, econômicos e ambientais da saúde. In Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. A saúde no Brasil em 2030 - prospecção estratégica do sistema de saúde brasileiro: população e perfil sanitário (Vol. 2). Fiocruz/Ipea/Ministério da Saúde/Secretaria de Assuntos Estratégicos da Presidência da República. https://saudeamanha.fiocruz.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/11.pdf
  6. Castiel, L. D., e Vasconcellos-Silva, P. R. (2002). Internet e o autocuidado em saúde: como juntar os trapinhos? História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, 9(2), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-59702002000200004
  7. Cline, R. J. W. (2001). Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Education Research, 16(6), 671–692. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/16.6.671
  8. Cotten, S. R., e Gupta, S. S. (2004). Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Social Science & Medicine, 59(9), 1795–1806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.020
  9. Demiris, G. (2016). Consumer Health Informatics: Past, Present, and Future of a Rapidly Evolving Domain. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 25(S 01), S42–S47. https://doi.org/10.15265/iys2016-s005
  10. Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Kuss, O., e Sa, E. R. (2002). Empirical Studies Assessing the Quality of Health Information for Consumers on the World Wide Web. JAMA, 287(20), 2691–2700. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.20.2691
  11. Ferreira, R. M. C. (2010). A experiência da audiência das telenovelas em Portugal: um modelo a partir da teoria fundamentada em dados [Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Nova]. Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de Sergipe. https://ri.ufs.br/bitstream/riufs/8710/2/RAQUEL_MARQUES_CARRICO_FERREIRA.pdf
  12. Fox, N., Ward, K., e O’Rourke, A. (2005). The ‘expert patient’: empowerment or medical dominance? The case of weight loss, pharmaceutical drugs and the Internet. Social Science & Medicine, 60(6), 1299–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.07.005
  13. Grierson, T., van Dijk, M. W., Dozois, E., e Mascher, J. (2006). Using the Internet to Build Community Capacity for Healthy Public Policy. Health Promotion Practice, 7(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839905278590
  14. Hardey, M. (1999). Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise. Sociology of Health & Illness, 21(6), 820–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00185
  15. Hardey, M. (2002). “The story of my illness”: personal accounts of illness on the Internet. Health, 6(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459302006001443
  16. Huh, J., DeLorme, D. E., e Reid, L. N. (2005). Factors Affecting Trust in On-line Prescription Drug Information and Impact of Trust on Behavior Following Exposure to DTC Advertising. Journal of Health Communication, 10(8), 711–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730500326716
  17. Korp, P. (2006). Health on the Internet: implications for health promotion. Health Education Research, 21(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyh043
  18. Organização Mundial da Saúde (2003). Cuidados inovadores para condições crônicas: componentes estruturais de ação.
  19. Orem, D. E. (2001). Nursing: Concepts of practice (6th ed.). Mosby
  20. Petronilho, F. A. S. (2012). Autocuidado: conceito central da enfermagem. Da conceptualização aos dados empíricos através de uma revisão da literatura dos últimos 20 anos. Formasau.
  21. Roberto, M. S., Fidalgo, A., e Buckingham, D. (2015). De que falamos quando falamos de infoexclusão e literacia digital? Perspectivas dos nativos digitais. SciELO Portugal, 9(1), 43–54.
  22. Santos, L., e Andrade, L. O. M. D. (2012). Acesso às ações e aos serviços de saúde: uma visão polissêmica. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 17(11), 2876–2878. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-81232012001100003
  23. Silva, E. V. e Castro, L. L. C. (2010). A internet como forma interativa de busca de informação sobre saúde pelo paciente. CORE. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/33543502.pdf
  24. Soares, M. C. (2004). Internet e saúde: possibilidades e limitações. Revista Textos de La CiberSociedad, 1(1). http://www.cibersociedad.net/textos/articulo.php?art=51
  25. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Pesquisa qualitativa: técnicas e procedimentos para o desenvolvimento de teoria fundamentada. Artmed.
  26. Zarcadoolas, C., Pleasant, A., & Greer, D. S. (2006). Advancing Health Literacy: A Framework for Understanding and Action (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  27. Ziebland, S., Chapple, A., Dumelow, C., Evans, J., Prinjha, S., e Rozmovits, L. (2004). How the internet affects patients’ experience of cancer: a qualitative study. BMJ, 328(7439), 564-569. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7439.564
How to Cite
Marques Carriço Ferreira, R., Pereira Nunes Bastos, R., & dos Santos, J. N. (2023). Motivation for the Search for Digital Health Information by a Quilombola Community. Anagramas Rumbos Y Sentidos De La Comunicación, 21(42), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.22395/angr.v22n42a16

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel

We are indexed in