Advance Search

Os desafios dos Princípios Orientadores das Nações Unidas sobre as Empresas e os Direitos Humanos em contextos tecnológicos: uma visão desde a evolução dos direitos humanos

Julián Tole Martínez
Latin American Observatory of Human Rights and Business, Externado de Colombia University
Manuela Losada Chavarro
Latin American Observatory of Human Rights and Business, Externado de Colombia University
Paula Lancheros Sánchez
Latin American Observatory of Human Rights and Business, Externado de Colombia University
Palavras-chave:
Copyright and Licensing:

Copyright (c) 2022 Opinión Jurídica

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Resumo

Este trabalho visa estudar e abordar as implicações das novas tecnologias na realização dos direitos humanos, sob os UNGP e os marcos normativos estabelecidos nos contextos nacionais e regionais, bem como na compreensão e realização das obrigações e responsabilidades dos autores envolvidos, especialmente dos Estados, as empresas, e até mesmo os indivíduos como clientes. Para isso, serão analisados alguns exemplos de riscos e impactos da evolução dos negócios tecnológicos à luz de três grupos de direitos: i. direitos civis e políticos, ii. direitos econômicos, sociais e culturais, iii. direitos coletivos. Isso levará a compreender os desafios existentes para otimizar a transformação digital e a necessidade de reconsiderar a eficácia da diligencia devida obrigatória em matéria de direitos humanos tal e como se conhece até agora, considerando os Direitos Humanos como um catálogo aberto que deve ser considerado como a ultima ratio em contextos onde as tensões entre tecnologia e direitos humanos estão presentes.

PDF (English)
PDF (English)

Referências

  1. Ausín, T, Morte, R. & Astobiza, M. (2020). Neuroderechos: Derechos humanos para las neurotecnologías. Diario La Ley. https://globernance.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/20201008-Neuroderechos-_Derechos_....pdf
  2. Ballinas, C. (2011) Participación política y las nuevas tecnologías de la información y la comunicación. Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación. https://bit.ly/3EXWmBS
  3. Barrio Andrés, M. (2021). Génesis y desarrollo de los derechos digitales. Revista de las Cortes Generales, (110), 197-233. https://doi.org/10.33426/rcg/2021/110/1572
  4. Beck, U. (1998) ¿Qué es la globalización? Paidós.
  5. Beduschi, A. (2022) Regulatory approaches to online harms and human rights: three case studies, Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. http://hdl.handle.net/10871/128451
  6. Bringnull, H. (2018) Dark Patterns. https://darkpatterns.org/.
  7. BSR. (2019). Google Celebrity Recognition API Human Rights Assessment. https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSRGoogle-CR-API-HRIA-Executive-Summary.pdf
  8. Castells, M. (2000) Globalisation, identity and the state. Social Dynamics (26:1), 5-17.
  9. Colomina, C. Sánchez Margalef, H. & Youngs, R. (2021). The impact of disinformation on democratic processes and human rights in the world. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EXPO_STU(2021)653635
  10. Conti, G. and Sobiesk, E. (2010) Malicious Interface Design: Exploiting the User. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (Raleigh, North Carolina, USA) (WWW ’10) (pp. 271-280). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772719
  11. Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2018, November 15th). Sentencia SU123/18 (Alberto Rojas Ríos & Rodrigo Uprimny Yepes, M. P.). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2018/SU123-18.htm
  12. Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2021, August 31st). Caso de los Buzos Miskitos (Lemoth Morris y otros) vs. Honduras. Sentencia de 31 de Agosto de 2021. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_432_esp.pdf
  13. Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2015, November 25th). Caso Pueblos Kaliña y Lokono vs. Surinam. Sentencia de 25 de noviembre de 2015, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_309_esp.pdf
  14. Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2021, October 1st). Caso Vera Rojas y otros vs. Chile. Resumen official emitido por la Corte Interamericana. http://cecoch.cl/website/www.cecoch.cl/uploads/pdf/Resumen_Caso_Vera_Rojas_vs_Chile.pdf
  15. Fiedler, D. (2018, November 27th). Is technology a game-changer for human rights in corporate value chains? Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment. http://resp.llas.ac.cn/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/105408
  16. Garzón, J. P. & Osuna, P. (2019). La era digital: una perspectiva de los desafíos impuestos por las TIC´s. Universitas Estudiantes, (20), 47-72. https://repository.javeriana.edu.co/handle/10554/57724
  17. González, Olga. (2018). El relevante papel de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en las democracias modernas. Buen Gobierno, (25), 1-26. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5696/569660605008/html/#redalyc_569660605008_ref1
  18. Herrera, A. (n. d). Desarrollo, tecnología y medio ambiente [Conference]. Primer seminario internacional sobre tecnologías adecuadas en nutrición y Vivienda, PNUMA, Mexico. http://agro.unc.edu.ar/~extrural/HerreraEspacioTecn.pdf
  19. Human Rights Council. (2020, March 4th). Question of the realization of economic, social and cultural rights in all countries: the role of the new technologies for the realization of economic, social and cultural rights. Report of the Secretary-General, A/HRC/43/29. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session43/Documents/A_HRC_43_29.pdf
  20. Human, S., Alt, R., Habibnia, H. & Neumann, G. (2022). Human-centric personal data protection and consenting assistant systems: towards a sustainable Digital Economy. https://epub.wu.ac.at/8312/1/2021_Human_Alt_Habibnia_Neumann_HICSS_Human-centric_Personal_Data_Protection_and_Consenting_Assistant_Systems.pdf
  21. International Labour Organization (ILO). (n. d.) What are workers´ rights? https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/our-work/workers-rights#:~:text=The%20International%20Labor%20Organization%20%28ILO%29%20identifies%20what%20it,of%20all%20forms%20of%20forced%20or%20compulsory%20labor%3B
  22. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2022). Working conditions. https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/working-conditions/lang--en/index.htm
  23. Johnson, D. & Post, D. (1996). Law and borders: the rise of law in cyberspace. Standford Law Review, 48, 1367-1402. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=535
  24. Julios-Campuzano, A. (2018). Los derechos humanos en la sociedad del riesgo. Crisis del Estado, Justicia intergeneracional y medio ambiente. Cuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho, (37), 66-94. https://doi.org/10.7203/CEFD.37.10729
  25. Lacey, C. & Caudwell, C. (2019, March 14th). Cuteness as a ’Dark Pattern’ in Home Robots [Conference]. The 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’19), Daegu, Republic of Korea. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3378680.3378736
  26. Lewis, C. (2014). Irresistible Apps: Motivational Design Patterns for Apps, Games, and Web-based Communities (1st ed.). Apress.
  27. Lucena-Cid, I. (2019). Las nuevas tecnologías y su impacto en los Derechos Humanos. Hacia un nuevo enfoque. Cuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho, (40), 128-146. https://doi.org/10.7203/CEFD.40.13035
  28. Luguri, J. & Strahilevitz, L. (2021). Shining a light on dark patterns. Journal of Legal Analysis, 13(1), 43-109. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laaa006
  29. Madrigal, A. (2017, October 12th). What Facebook did to American Democracy. And why it was so hard to see it coming. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/10/what-facebookdid/542502/
  30. Mathur, A., Mayer, J. & Kshirsagar, M. (2021, May 8-13th). What Makes a Dark Pattern... Dark?: Design Attributes, Normative Considerations, and Measurement Methods [Conference]. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21). Yokohama, Japan. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445610
  31. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/sti_in_outlook-2016-en
  32. Randolph, R. (2000). La mutación urbana: de la red de ciudades a la ciudad como red. In S. Finquelievich (comp.), ¡Ciudadanos a la Red! CICUS.
  33. Wingfield, R., Tuta I. & Bansal, T. (2020). El sector tecnológico y los planes de acción nacionales de empresas y derechos humanos. The Danish Institute of Human Rights; Global Partners Digital. https://globalnaps.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/el-sector-technologico-y-los-planes-de-accion-nacionales-deempresas-y-ddhh-suplemento-tematico-julio-2020-instituto-danes-de-ddhh-y-global-partnersdigital.pdf
  34. Rojo Torrecilla, E. (2020). Las tecnologías, las plataformas digitales y el derecho del trabajo. Revista Jurídica del Trabajo, 1(1), 263-277. http://www.revistajuridicadeltrabajo.com/index.php/rjt/article/view/14
  35. Roose, K. (2020, November 6th). Facebook y Twitter apostaron por empeorar sus plataformas el día de las elecciones. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/es/2020/11/06/espanol/eleccion-usatwitter-facebook.html
  36. Tabares, L. & Tamayo, N. (2019). Protección de los derechos de los consumidores y la responsabilidad social. Revista Estudios del Desarrollo Social: Cuba y América Latina, 7(2). http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S2308-01322019000200016&script=sci_arttext&tlng=pt
  37. Tecnología Libre de Conflicto. (n.d.). The environment and electronic devices. Tecnología Libre de Conflicto – Alboan. https://www.tecnologialibredeconflicto.org/en/environment/
  38. Tucho, F., Vicente, M. & García, J. (2017). La cara oculta de la sociedad de la información: el impacto medioambiental de la producción, el consumo y los residuos tecnológicos. Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, (136), 45-61. https://revistachasqui.org/index.php/chasqui/article/view/3321
  39. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2016). United Nations Guidelines for Consumer Protection. United Nations Guidelines for Consumer Protection. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditccplpmisc2016d1_en.pdf
  40. United Nations General Assembly. (2013, January 11th). Annual report of the Unite Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, A/HRC/22/17/Add.4. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Opinion/SeminarRabat/Rabat_draft_outcome.pdf
  41. United Nations News. (2020, November 11th). Social media-based trafficking on the rise during coronavirus pandemic. https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/11/1077402
  42. United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (2021a). Bridging Governance Gaps in the Age of Technology – Key Characteristics of the State Duty to Protect. A B-Tech Foundational Paper. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Business/B-Tech/b-tech-foundational-paper-state-dutyto-protect.pdf
  43. United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (2021b). Key Characteristics of Business Respect for Human Rights. A B-Tech Foundational Paper. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Business/B-Tech/key-characteristics-business-respect.pdf
  44. United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (2021c). Reflections on the Status of Business Respect for Human Rights in the Technology Sector. A B-Tech company Community of Practice note. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/reflections-status-business-respect.pdf
  45. United Nations Organization. (1966, December 16th). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Assembly Resolution 2200A (XXI). https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights
  46. United Nations Organization. (2011, July 6th). Resolution 17/4 - Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises, General Assembly Resolution A/HRC/RES/17/4. https://media.businesshumanrights.org/media/documents/5a5ec2dffb1a6e386f573315220b462dc092e0d8.pdf
  47. United Nations Organization. (2011, March 21st). Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie: Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework. https://media.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/files/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding-principles-21-mar-2011.pdf
  48. United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights. (2021). UNGPs 10+ A roadmap for the next decade of business and human rights. https://bit.ly/3TiQ6sU
  49. White House President Barack Obama. (n. d.). About the Brain Initiative. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/BRAIN
  50. Zagal, J., Björk, S. & Lewis, C. (2013, May 14th). Dark patterns in the design of games [Conference]. 8th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, Chania, Greece. http://www.fdg2013.org/program/papers.html
Como Citar
Tole Martínez, J., Losada Chavarro, M., & Lancheros Sánchez, P. (2022). Os desafios dos Princípios Orientadores das Nações Unidas sobre as Empresas e os Direitos Humanos em contextos tecnológicos: uma visão desde a evolução dos direitos humanos. Opinión Jurídica, 21(46), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v21n46a8

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel

Estamos indexados em

  • CATEGORÍA C