Advance Search

Representation of Women on Facebook: Stereotypes and Digital Communication in Online Publications

Carlos Villanueva Valadez | Bio
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
Diana Carolina García Mata | Bio
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
Keywords:
Copyright and Licensing:

Copyright (c) 2024 Anagramas Rumbos y Sentidos de la Comunicación

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This recent research focused on examining gender representations and stereotypes in publications by various brands on Facebook. Given the growing impact of digital advertising communication on collective perception, it is crucial to unravel how gender stereotypes are delineated and reinforced, and the reach of their influence on socialization in highly digitized contexts. For this purpose, an analysis framework supported by 15 determined indicators was designed to evaluate gender constructions in the publications. The analyzed set included 316 publications, with an emphasis on the dynamics between stereotypes, product categories, gender roles, and both symbolic and contextual elements. Findings suggested marked discrepancies in gender representation. Specifically, the consolidation of conventional stereotypes was confirmed, with a particular emphasis on female figures. Notably, in areas such as food, appliances, and fashion, these representations are intensely correlated with certain physical traits. Despite traces of evolution in such representations, which might hint at changes in current social roles, the dominance of ancestral stereotypes is evident. These constructions significantly impact the collective imagination, reinforcing gender inequalities. This research work highlights the need to adjust digital content, and bestows a fundamental responsibility on brands and online entities in this context. Also, it urges diversifying research to include various platforms and broader data sets.

PDF (Español)
PDF (Español)

References

  1. Ashmore, R. D., & Del Boca, F. K. (1981). Conceptual approaches to stereotypes and stereotyping. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 1-35). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  3. Boddewyn, J. J., & Kunz, H. (1991). Sex and decency issues in advertising: General and international dimensions. Business Horizons, 34(5), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90040-3
  5. Castillo-Mayén, R., & Montes-Berges, B. (2014). Análisis de los estereotipos de género actuales. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1044-1060. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=16731690027
  7. Correll, S. J., Thébaud, S., & Bernard, S. (2007). An introduction to the social psychology of gender. In S. J. Correll (Ed.), Social Psychology of Gender (Advances in Group Processes, (24) (pp. 1-18). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6145(07)24001-9
  9. Cortese, A. J. P. (2007). Provocateur: Images of women and minorities in advertising (3a. ed.). Rowman & Littlefield Pub Inc.
  11. Chávarro, A., & Castrillón Osorio, M. C. (2020). Las representaciones sociales del cuerpo femenino propuestas por las influenciadoras caleñas que usan Instagram para promover hábitos de vida saludable. Procedimientos de conferencia. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:230684813
  13. Dahlen, M., & Rosengren, S. (2016). If advertising won’t die, what will it be? Toward a working definition of advertising. Journal of Advertising, 45(3), 334-345. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00913367.2016.1172387
  15. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2004). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: Implications for the partner preferences of women and men. En A. H. Eagly, A.
  16. E. Beall & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2ª ed., pp. 269-295). The Guilford Press.
  17. Edell, J. A., & Burke, M. C. (1987). The power of feelings in understanding advertising effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 421-433.
  19. Ferrante, C. L., Haynes, A. M., & Kingsley, S. C. (1988). Image and self: Exploring the relationship between imagery and self-esteem. Harper & Row.
  21. Forni, P., & Grande, P. D. (2020). Triangulación y métodos mixtos en las ciencias sociales contemporáneas. Revista mexicana de sociología, 82(1), 159-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iis.01882503p.2020.1.58064
  23. Gallego, J. (2009). Actes de Congenère: La representació de gènere a la publicitat del segle XXI. Universitat de Girona, Servei de Publicacions. Recuperado de https://dugi-doc.udg.edu/handle/10256/2769
  25. Goffman, E. (1979). Gender advertisements.
  27. Gómez, J. (2000). Métodos y técnicas de investigación en comunicación social. Editorial Síntesis.
  29. Guix Oliver, J. (2008). El análisis de contenidos: ¿qué nos están diciendo? Revista de Calidad Asistencial, 23(1), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1134-282X(08)70464-0
  31. Guzmán, V. (2021). El método cualitativo y su aporte a la investigación en las ciencias sociales. Gestionar: Revista de Empresa y Gobierno, 1(4), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.35622/j.rg.2021.04.002
  32. Katzew, A. (2011). Shut up! Representations of the Latino/a body in Ugly Betty and their educational implications. Latino Studies, 9, 300–320. https://doi.org/10.1057/lst.2011.16
  34. Lafky, S., Duffy, M., Steinmaus, M., & Berkowitz, D. (1996). Looking through gendered lenses: Female stereotyping in advertisements and gender role expectations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(2), 379-388.
  36. Lundstrom, W., & Sciglimpaglia, D. (1977). Sex role portrayals in advertising. Journal of Marketing, 41(3), 72-79.
  38. Mellado Ruiz, C., & Ovando, A. (2021). Periodistas y redes sociales en Chile: Transformación digital y nuevas formas de visibilidad y creación de identidad. Palabra Clave, 24(2), e2422. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2021.24.2.2
  40. Mora, B. L. S. (2020). El significado de la feminidad: estudio basado en relatos de vida de mujeres. Revista Espiga, 19(39), 46-62.
  42. Prado Ishuiza, C. A., Zavala Coronel, S. G., & Lovón Cueva, M. A. (2021). La representación de la mujer venezolana en redes sociales peruanas a través del término veneca. Lengua y Sociedad, 20(2), 313-331.
  44. O’Guinn, T. C., Allen, C. T., Semenik, R. J., & Close, A. (2009). Advertising and integrated brand promotion. South Western Cengage Learning.
  46. Orth, U. R., & Holancova, D. (2003). Men’s and women’s responses to sex role portrayals in advertisements. Journal of Advertising 32(4), 77-89. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00913367.2003.10639144
  48. Rajagopal, I., & Gales, J. (2002). It’s the Image That Is Imperfect: Advertising and Its Impact on Women. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(32), 3333-3337. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4412464
  50. Reichert, T., & Carpenter, C. (2004). An update on sex in magazine advertising: 1983 to 2003. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(4), 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100407
  52. Rueda, R., & Giraldo Giraldo, D. C. (2016). La imagen de perfil en Facebook: identidad y representación en esta red social. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:164074603
  54. Schiffman, L. G., & Lazar Kanuk, L. (2010). Comportamiento del Consumidor (10ª ed.). Prentice Hall.Steckler, A., McLeroy, K. R., Goodman, R. M., Bird, S. T., & McCormick, L. (1992). Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: an introduction. Health Education Quarterly, 19(1), 1-8.
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/21586597_Toward_Integrating_Qualitative_and_Quantitative_Methods_An_Introduction
  57. Stern, B. B. (1993). Feminist literary criticism and the deconstruction of ads: A postmodern view of advertising and consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4), 556-566. https://doi.org/10.1086/209322
  59. Swedish Women’s Lobby. (2020). Sexist advertisement in the Nordic countries. https://sverigeskvinnolobby.se/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Sexist-advertisement-in-the-Nordiccountries.pdf
  60. Tortajada, I., Araüna, N., & Martínez, I. (2013). Estereotipos publicitarios y representaciones de género en las redes sociales. Comunicar, xxi(41), 177-186. [Consultado el 12 de Julio de 2023]. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=15828675019
  62. Uray, N., & Burnaz, S. (2003). An analysis of the portrayal of gender roles in Turkish television advertisements. Sex Roles, 48, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022348813469
  63. Velandia-Morales, A., & Rincón, J. C. (2014). Estereotipos y roles de género utilizados en la publicidad transmitida a través de la televisión. Universitas Psychologica, 13(2), 517-527.
  64. Vinacke, W. E. (1957). Stereotypes as conceptual phenomena. Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 229-243.
  65. Varghese, N., & Kumar, N. (2022). Feminism in advertising: Irony or revolution? A critical review of femvertising. Feminist Media Studies, 22(2), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1825510
  67. Whipple, T. W., & Courtney, A. E. (1980). How to portray women in TV commercials. Journal of Advertising Research, 20(2), 53-59.
  68. Zotos, Y. C., & Tsichla, E. (2014). Female stereotypes in print advertising: A retrospective analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148, 209-214.
How to Cite
Villanueva Valadez, C., & García Mata, D. C. (2024). Representation of Women on Facebook: Stereotypes and Digital Communication in Online Publications . Anagramas Rumbos Y Sentidos De La Comunicación, 23(45), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.22395/angr.v23n45a12

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel

We are indexed in