Variedades y variaciones de capitalismo en la periferia. América latina y el este asiático reconsiderados
Barra lateral del artículo
Enviado:
ago 17, 2018
Publicado:
ago 21, 2018
Citations
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Los artículos que se aprueban para publicación en la revista Semestre Económico deben acogerse a las siguientes condiciones:
a) Los autores ceden a la revista Semestre Económico los derechos patrimoniales (copy right), para lo cual debe entregar el formato de originalidad y derechos de autor debidamente diligenciado y con firmas originales.
b) Los artículos que se publican en la revista Semestre Económico se pueden usar, reproducir, transmitir y exponer con fines académicos siempre y cuando se cumplan las siguientes condiciones:
- Se cite la referencia bibliográfica de Semestre Económico (autores, revista, editorial, edición,…)
- No se use con fines comerciales
- El uso con fines diferentes o la publicación en otro sitio electrónico requiere de la autorización por escrito del editor de la revista.
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El artículo propone un marco analítico alternativo al enfoque institucional de variedades de capitalismo para comprender la divergente emergencia y dinamismo industrial entre el Este Asiático y América Latina en el denominado Sur Global. El carácter alternativo se fundamenta en el distanciamiento del tratamiento nacionalista metodológico y focalizado en las complementariedades institucionales identificadas en países desarrollados –propio de este enfoque–, para considerar las características que identifican a países en contextos periféricos, y los cambios temporales y espaciales en estos. Se introduce las nociones de 'núcleo de acumulación' y 'núcleo de implicación estatal' como herramientas teóricas alternativas que consideran tal condición periférica –y sus cambios–, entendiendo los procesos de acumulación y los Estados que conforman las macro-regiones analizadas en una relación dialéctica e ínter-penetrante con permisividades externas y viabilidades internas.
Palabras clave:
Cómo citar
Ramiro Fernández, V., Bazza, A., & Seiler, C. (2018). Variedades y variaciones de capitalismo en la periferia. América latina y el este asiático reconsiderados. Semestre Económico, 20(45), 77–108. https://doi.org/10.22395/seec.v20n45a3
Detalles del artículo
Citas
Acemoglu, Daron y Robinson, James (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business, 546p.
Akamatsu, Kaname (1961). A theory of unbalanced growth in the world economy. En: Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 86, No. 2, p. 192-215.
Akamatsu, Kaname (1962). A historical pattern of economic growth in developing countries. En:The Developing Economies, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 3-25.
Amsden, Alice (1989). Asia´s Next Giant. South Korea and Late Industrialization. Nueva York:Oxford University Press, 400p.
Amsden, Alice (2001). The rise of ‘‘The Rest’’. Challenges to the West from Late-IndustrializingEconomies. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 416p.
Amsden, Alice (2007). Escape from empire: the developing world’s journey through heaven andhell. Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 209p.
Arceo, Enrique (2005). El impacto de la globalización en la periferia y las nuevas y viejas formasde la dependencia en América Latina. En: Cuadernos del CENDES, Vol. 22, No. 60, p. 25-61.
Arrighi, Giovanni (1994). The long twentieth century: Money, power, and the origins of our times.New York: Verso, 400p.
Arrighi, G. (2007). Adam Smith en PekiÌn: oriÌgenes y fundamentos del siglo XXI. Madrid: Akal, 432p.
Baek, Seung-Wook (2005). Does China follow 'the East Asian development model'? En: Journalof Contemporary Asia, Vol. 35, No. 4, p. 485-498.
Beeson, Mark (2004). The rise and fall (?) of the developmental state: The vicissitudes and implicationsof East Asian interventionism, p. 29-40. En: Linda Low (Ed.), Developmental states: relevancy, redundancy or reconfiguration. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 240p.
Bello, Walden (1999). Dark Victory: The United States and Global Poverty. London: Pluto Press, 172p.
Blyde, Juan (Ed.) (2014). Fábricas Sincronizadas. Washington: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, 209p.
Boschi, Renato Raul (2011). Variedades de capitalismo, política e desenvolvimento na América Latina. Río de Janeiro: Editora UFMG, 374p.
Brenner, Neil (1997). Global, fragmented, hierarchical: Henri Lefebvre’s geographies of globalization. En: Public Culture, Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 135-167.
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique (1972). Estado y sociedad en América Latina. Buenos Aires: NuevaVisión, 250p.
Carroll, William y Carson, Colin (2003). Forging a new hegemony? The role of transnational policygroups in the network and discourses of global corporate governance. En: Journal of
World-Systems Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, p. 67-102.
Castellani, Ana (2002). La gestión estatal durante los regímenes políticos burocrático-autoritarios. El caso argentino entre 1967 y 1969. En: Sociohistórica, No. 11-12, p. 35-68.
Castells, Manuel (1992). Four Asian Tigers with a dragon head: a comparative analysis of the state, economy and society in the Asian Pacific Rim, p. 33-70. En: Richard Appelbaum y Jeffrey Henderson (Eds.), State and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim. London: Sage, 320p.
Castells, Manuel (1996). The rise of the network society (Vol. 1). The information age: economy, society, and culture. Oxford: Blackwell, 624p.
Chang, Ha-Joon (2010). How to ‘do’a developmental state: political, organisational and human resource requirements for the developmental state, p. 82-96. En: Omano Edigheji (Ed.),
Constructing a democratic developmental state in South Africa: potentials and challenges. Cape Town: HSRC Press, 326p.
Chang, Ha-Joon y Evans, Peter (1999). The role of institutions in economic change, p. 99-129. En: Silvana de Paula y Gary Dymski (Eds.), Reimagining growth. Towards a renewal of development theory. London: Zed Book, 320p.
Cheng, Luâ€Lin y Gereffi, Gary (1994). The informal economy in East Asian development. En: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, p. 194-219.
Chibber, Vivek (2002). Bureaucratic Rationality and the Developmetal State. En: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 107, No. 4, p. 951-988.
Chibber, Vivek (2003). Locked in place: State-building and late industrialization in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 355p.
Chibber, Vivek (2008). ¿Revivir el Estado desarrollista? El mito de la 'Burguesía Nacional'. En: Documentos y Aportes en Administración Pública y Gestión Estatal, Vol. 8, No. 11, p. 7-34.
Cho, Yoon-Je y Kim, Joon-Kyung (1997). Credit policies and the industrialization of Korea (Vol. Korea Development Institute). Seoul: World Bank Publications, 160p.
Cimoli, Mario (2005). Heterogeneidad estructural, asimetrías tecnológicas y crecimiento en América Latina. Santiago, Chile: Cepal/BID, 162p.
Cox, Robert (1987). Production, power, and world order: Social forces in the making of history. New York: Columbia University Press, 500p.
Crotty, James y Kang-Kook, Lee (2001). Economic performance in post-crisis Korea: A critical perspective on neoliberal restructuring. En: Seoul Journal of Economics, Vol. 14, No. 2, p.
183-242. Crotty, James y Lee, Kang-Kook (2002). Is financial liberalization good for developing nations?
The case of South Korea in the 1990s. En: Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 34, No. 3, p. 327-334.
Crotty, James y Lee, Kang-Kook (2005). From East Asian 'miracle' to neo-liberal 'mediocrity': the effects of liberalization and financial opening on the post-crisis Korean economy. En:
Global Economic Review, Vol. 34, No. 4, p. 415-434.
Davis, Diane (2004). Discipline and development: middle classes and prosperity in East Asia and Latin America. Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 436p.
Deyo, Frederic (1987). State and labor: Modes of political exclusion in East Asian development, p. 182-202. En: Frederic Deyo (Ed.), The political economy of the new Asian industrialism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 254p.
Dicken, Peter (2011). Global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy. New York: The Guilford Press, 625p.
Doner, Richard (2009). The politics of uneven development: Thailand’s economic growth in comparative perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, 369p.
Doucette, Jamie (2009). The postdevelopmental state: The reconfiguration of political space and the politics of economic reform in South Korea. Tesis doctoral. Vancouver: University
of British Columbia, 336p.
Epstein, Gerald A, Sclesinger, Tom y Vernengo, Matias (2014). Banking, monetary policy and the political economy of financial regulation: Essays in the tradition of Jane D’Arista. Cheltenham y Northampton: Edward Elgar, 392p.
Esser, Klaus (1993). América Latina. Industrialización sin visión. En: Nueva Sociedad, No. 125, p. 27-46.
Estévez-Abe, Margarita (2008). Welfare and capitalism in postwar Japan (Vol. New York): Cambridge University Press, 360p.
Evans, Peter (1998). Alternativas al Estado desarrollista. Lecciones de la crisis de Asia Oriental. En: Nueva Sociedad, No. 155, p. 143-156.
Fajnzylber, Fernando (1983). La Industrialización trunca de América Latina. México D.F.: Editorial Nueva Imagen, 416p.
Fajnzylber, Fernando (1987). Reflexiones sobre las particularidades de América Latina y el sudeste asiático y sus referencias en el mundo industrializado. En: Investigación Económica,
Vol. 46, No. 180, p. 63-109.
Faletto, Enzo (1989). La especificidad del Estado en América latina. En: Revista de La Cepal, No. 38, p. 69-87.
Fernandez, Victor; Lauxmann, Carolina y Trevignani, Manuel (2014). Emergencia del Sur Global. Perspectivas para el desarrollo de la periferia latinoamericana. En: Economia e Sociedade, Vol. 23, No. 3, p. 611-643.
Fernández, Víctor Ramiro (2010). Desarrollo regional bajo transformaciones trans-escalares ¿Por qué y cómo recuperar la escala nacional?, p. 301–341. En: Víctor Ramiro Fernández y CarlosBrandão (Eds.) Escalas y políticas del desarrollo regional. Desafíos para América Latina. Buenos Aires: Editorial Miño y Dávila, 352p.
Fernández, Víctor Ramiro (2013). Doble amenaza, doble debilidad un mismo desafío. Latinoamérica ante la crisis del centro y la desigual emergencia del sur global. Documento de Trabajo del IIETE. Instituto de Investigación Estado, Territorio y Economía. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Santa Fe.
Fernández, Víctor Ramiro y Alfaro, María Belén (2011). Ideas y políticas del desarrollo regional bajo variedades de capitalismo: contribuciones desde la periferia. En: Revista Paranaense de Desenvolvimento, No. 120, p. 57-99.
Fernández, Víctor Ramiro y Bazza, Alcides (2016). Repensando las Variedades de Capitalismo desde la Periferia. En: Desenvolvimento Em Questão, Vol. 14, No. 35, p. 5–34.
Ffrench-Davis, Ricardo (2005). Reforming Latin America’s Economies. After Market Fundamentalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 270p.
Fiori, José Luís (2015). História, estratégia e desenvolvimento: para uma geopolítica do capitalismo. São Paulo: Editorial Boitempo, 277p.
Gereffi, Gary (1989). Rethinking development theory: Insights from East Asia and Latin America. En: Sociological Forum, Vol. 4, No. 4, p. 505-533.
Glassman, Jim (2011). The geoâ€political economy of global production networks. En Geography Compass, Vol. 5, No. 4, p. 154-164.
Gowan, Peter (1999). The global gamble: Washington’s Faustian bid for world dominance. London: Verso, 336p.
Hall, Peter y Soskice, David (2001). An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism, p. 1-70. En: Peter Hall y David Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 560p.
Hart-Landsberg, Martin y Burkett, Paul (2001). Economic crisis and restructuring in South Korea: Beyond the free market-statist debate. En: Critical Asian Studies, Vol. 33, No. 3, p. 403-430.
Henderson, Jeffrey (2011). East Asian transformation: on the political economy of dynamism, governance and crisis. London: Routledge, 184p.
Henderson, Jeffrey y Hulme, David (2002). Globalization, national economic governance and poverty elimination: Insights from East Asia and Eastern Europe. Final Report to the Department for International Development. (Globalisation and Poverty Programme), Project R7861. Jaguaribe, Helio (1979). Autonomía periférica y hegemonía céntrica. En: Estudios Internacionales, Vol. 12, No. 46, p. 91-130.
Jessop, Bob (2015). Comparative Capitalisms and/or Variegated Capitalism, p. 65–82. En: Matthias Ebenau, Ian Bruff y Christopher May (Eds.). New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research: Critical and Global Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 252p.
Ji (2013). The Fall of the Developmental State and the Rise of the Neoliberal State in South Korea: Transformations in Historical, Geographical, and Social Relations, p. 89-134. En: VV.AA. (Ed.), Geo-political Economies of East Asia. Re-locating East Asian Developmental States in their Transnational and Local Contexts. Seoul: Seoul National University Asia Center, 420p.
Johnson, Chalmers (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle: the growth of industrial policy: 1925- 1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 409p.
Jomo, Kwame (2001). Globalisation, liberalisation, poverty and income inequality in Southeast Asia. OECD Development Centre Working Papers, No. 185, 43p.
Jomo, Kwame (2003). Globalization, liberalization and equitable development: lessons from East Asia. Ginebra: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Overarching Concerns Paper, No. 3, 35p.
Jomo, Kwame (2006). Growth with equity in East Asia? En: DESA Working Paper Nº 33, Department of Economic and Social Affairs of United Nations, Nwe York, 54p.
Kasahara, Shigehisa (2004). The Flying Geese Paradigm: A critical study of its application to East Asian regional development. UNCTAD Discussion Papers, No. 169, Ginebra, 34p.
Kay, Cristóbal (2002). Reforma agraria, industrialización y desarrollo: ¿ Por qué Asia Oriental superó a América Latina? En: Debate Agrario, No. 34, p. 45-94.
Kiely, Ray (1998). Neo liberalism revised? A critical account of World Bank concepts of good governance and market friendly intervention. En: Capital & Class, Vol. 22, No. 1, p. 63-88.
Kohli, Atul (2004). State-directed development: political power and industrialization in the global periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 480p.
Kroeber, Arthur (2011). Developmental dreams: Policy and reality in China’s economic reforms, p. 44-65. En: Scott Kennedy (Ed.), Beyond the Middle Kingdom: Comparative perspectives on China’s capitalist transformation. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 280p.
Lee, Eddy (1999). The debate on the causes of the Asian crisis: Crony capitalism versus international system failure. En: International Politics and Society, No. 2, p. 162-167.
Levy, David (2008). Political Contestation in Global Production Networks. En: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, No. 4, p. 943-962. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.34422006
Levy-Orlik, Noemi (2009). Protectionism and industrialization: a critical assessment of the Latin American industrialization period. En: Revista de Economia Política, Vol. 29, No. 4, p.
436-453.
Lim, Hyun-Chin y Jang, Jin-Ho (2006). Neo-liberalism in post-crisis South Korea: Social conditions and outcomes. En: Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 36, No. 4, p. 442-463.
Lim, Linda (1997). The Southeast Asian currency crisis and its aftermath. En Journal of Asian Business, Vol. 13, No. 4, p. 65-83.
Medeiros, Carlos Aguiar de (2010). Instituições e desenvolvimento econômico: uma nota crítica ao' nacionalismo metodológico'. En Economia e Sociedade, Vol. 19, No. 3, p. 637-645.
Ocampo, José (2011). Seis décadas de debates económicos latinoamericanos. En: Initiative for Policy Dialogue, 25 p.
Ocampo, José y Ros, Jaime (2011). Shifting paradigms in Latin America’s economic development,p. 4-25. En José Ocampo y Jaime Ros (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Latin American Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 896p.
O’Donnell, Guillermo (1973). Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism: Studies in South American politics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 219p.
O’Donnell, Guillermo (2009). El Estado burocrático autoritario 1966-1973: triunfos, derrotas y crisis. Buenos Aires: Prometeo, 499p.
Öniş, Ziya (1991). The logic of the developmental state. En: Comparative Politics, Vol. 24, No. 1, p. 109-126.
Ozawa, Terutomo (2002). The 'hidden' side of the 'flying-geese' catch-up model: Japan’s dirigiste institutional setup and a deepening financial morass. En: Journal of Asian Economics,
Vol. 12, No. 4, p. 471-491.
Ozawa, Terutomo (2011). The (Japanâ€born) ‘flyingâ€geese’ theory of economic development revisited– and reformulated from a structuralist perspective. En: Global Policy, Vol. 2, No. 3,
p. 272-285.
Palma, José Gabriel (2009). The revenge of the market on the rentiers. Why neo-liberal reports of the end of history turned out to be premature. En: Cambridge Journal of Economics,
Vol. 33, No. 4, p. 829-869.
Park, S.J. (2013). Developmental state in Korea (60-70ties) revisited: Institution-building for the making of 'coordinated market. En: Ordnungspolitische Diskurse, Working Paper, No. 2013-02, 30p.
Peck, Jamie y Theodore, Nik (2007). Variegated capitalism. En: Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 31, No. 6, p. 731-772. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309132507083505
Pempel, Thomas J (1999). The developmental regime in a changing world economy, p. 137-181.
En: Meredith Woo-Cummings (Ed.), The developmental state. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 368p.
Portantiero, Juan Carlos (1989). La múltiple transformación del Estado latinoamericano. En: Nueva sociedad, No. 104, p. 88-94.
Portes, Alejandro y Hoffman, Kelly (2003). La estructura de clases en América Latina: composición y cambios durante la era neoliberal. En: Desarrollo Económico, Vol. 43, No. 171, p. 355-387. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3455890
Prebisch, Raúl (1981). Capitalismo periférico. Crisis y transformación. México D.F., Fondo de Cultura Económica, 344p.
Prebisch, Raúl (1986). El desarrollo económico de la América Latina y algunos de sus principales problemas. En: Desarrollo Económico, Vol. 26, No. 103, p. 479-502.
Rosenberger, Leif (1997). Southeast Asia’s currency crisis: a diagnosis and prescription. En: Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 19, Nº 3, p. 223.
Ross, John (2008). India and China’s challenge in the current economic crisis. Key Trends in Globalisation: 20 years of accurate predictions on China and the world economy. 30 de noviembre.
Sassen, Saskia (2010). Global inter-city networks and commodity chains: any intersections? En: Global Networks, Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 150-163.
Ben Ross (2009). Hierarchical market economies and varieties of capitalism in Latin America. En: Journal of Latin American Studies, Vol. 41, No. 03, p. 553-575.
Schneider, Ben Ross (2013). Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 262p.
Schneider, Ben Ross y Soskice, David (2009). Inequality in developed countries and Latin America: coordinated, liberal and hierarchical systems. En: Economy and society, Vol. 38, No.
1, p. 17-52.
Schoppa, Leonard (2006). Race for the Exits. The Unraveling of Japan’s System of Social Protection. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 272p.
Schuldt, Jürgen y Acosta, Alberto (2006). Petróleo, rentismo y subdesarrollo: ¿una maldición sin solución? En: Nueva sociedad, No. 204, p. 71-89.
Shin, Kwang-Yeong (2010). Globalisation and the working class in South Korea: Contestation, fragmentation and renewal. En: Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 40, No. 2, p. 211-229.
Soto, Roberto (2013). América Latina: Entre la financiarización y el financiamiento productivo. En: Problemas del desarrollo, Vol. 44, No. 173, p. 57-78.
Sunkel, Osvaldo (1971). Desarrollo, subdesarrollo, dependencia, marginación y desigualdades espaciales; hacia un enfoque totalizante. En: Investigación Económica, Vol. 31, No. 121, p. 23-77.
Tachibanaki, Toshiaki (2006). Inequality and poverty in Japan. En: Japanese Economic Review, Vol. 57, No. 1, p. 1-27.
Thurbon, Elizabeth (2003). Ideational inconsistency and institutional incapacity: Why financial liberalisation in South Korea went horribly wrong. En: New Political Economy, Vol. 8, No.
3, p. 341-361.
Vu, Tuong (2007). State formation and the origins of developmental states in South Korea and Indonesia. En: Studies in comparative international development, Vol. 41, No. 4, p. 27-56.
Wade, Robert (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 456p.
Wade, Robert y Veneroso, Frank (1998). The Asian crisis: the high debt model versus the Wall Street-Treasury-IMF complex. En: New Left Review, No. 228, p. 3-23.
Woo-Cumings, Meredith (1999). The developmental state: Cornell University Press, 368p.
Yeung, Henry Wai-chung (2000). State intervention and neoliberalism in the globalizing world economy: lessons from Singapore’s regionalization programme. En: The Pacific Review,
Vol. 13, No. 1, p. 133-162.
Zysman, John (1983). Governments, markets, and growth: financial systems and the politics of industrial change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 358p.
Akamatsu, Kaname (1961). A theory of unbalanced growth in the world economy. En: Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 86, No. 2, p. 192-215.
Akamatsu, Kaname (1962). A historical pattern of economic growth in developing countries. En:The Developing Economies, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 3-25.
Amsden, Alice (1989). Asia´s Next Giant. South Korea and Late Industrialization. Nueva York:Oxford University Press, 400p.
Amsden, Alice (2001). The rise of ‘‘The Rest’’. Challenges to the West from Late-IndustrializingEconomies. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 416p.
Amsden, Alice (2007). Escape from empire: the developing world’s journey through heaven andhell. Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 209p.
Arceo, Enrique (2005). El impacto de la globalización en la periferia y las nuevas y viejas formasde la dependencia en América Latina. En: Cuadernos del CENDES, Vol. 22, No. 60, p. 25-61.
Arrighi, Giovanni (1994). The long twentieth century: Money, power, and the origins of our times.New York: Verso, 400p.
Arrighi, G. (2007). Adam Smith en PekiÌn: oriÌgenes y fundamentos del siglo XXI. Madrid: Akal, 432p.
Baek, Seung-Wook (2005). Does China follow 'the East Asian development model'? En: Journalof Contemporary Asia, Vol. 35, No. 4, p. 485-498.
Beeson, Mark (2004). The rise and fall (?) of the developmental state: The vicissitudes and implicationsof East Asian interventionism, p. 29-40. En: Linda Low (Ed.), Developmental states: relevancy, redundancy or reconfiguration. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 240p.
Bello, Walden (1999). Dark Victory: The United States and Global Poverty. London: Pluto Press, 172p.
Blyde, Juan (Ed.) (2014). Fábricas Sincronizadas. Washington: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, 209p.
Boschi, Renato Raul (2011). Variedades de capitalismo, política e desenvolvimento na América Latina. Río de Janeiro: Editora UFMG, 374p.
Brenner, Neil (1997). Global, fragmented, hierarchical: Henri Lefebvre’s geographies of globalization. En: Public Culture, Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 135-167.
Cardoso, Fernando Henrique (1972). Estado y sociedad en América Latina. Buenos Aires: NuevaVisión, 250p.
Carroll, William y Carson, Colin (2003). Forging a new hegemony? The role of transnational policygroups in the network and discourses of global corporate governance. En: Journal of
World-Systems Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, p. 67-102.
Castellani, Ana (2002). La gestión estatal durante los regímenes políticos burocrático-autoritarios. El caso argentino entre 1967 y 1969. En: Sociohistórica, No. 11-12, p. 35-68.
Castells, Manuel (1992). Four Asian Tigers with a dragon head: a comparative analysis of the state, economy and society in the Asian Pacific Rim, p. 33-70. En: Richard Appelbaum y Jeffrey Henderson (Eds.), State and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim. London: Sage, 320p.
Castells, Manuel (1996). The rise of the network society (Vol. 1). The information age: economy, society, and culture. Oxford: Blackwell, 624p.
Chang, Ha-Joon (2010). How to ‘do’a developmental state: political, organisational and human resource requirements for the developmental state, p. 82-96. En: Omano Edigheji (Ed.),
Constructing a democratic developmental state in South Africa: potentials and challenges. Cape Town: HSRC Press, 326p.
Chang, Ha-Joon y Evans, Peter (1999). The role of institutions in economic change, p. 99-129. En: Silvana de Paula y Gary Dymski (Eds.), Reimagining growth. Towards a renewal of development theory. London: Zed Book, 320p.
Cheng, Luâ€Lin y Gereffi, Gary (1994). The informal economy in East Asian development. En: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, p. 194-219.
Chibber, Vivek (2002). Bureaucratic Rationality and the Developmetal State. En: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 107, No. 4, p. 951-988.
Chibber, Vivek (2003). Locked in place: State-building and late industrialization in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 355p.
Chibber, Vivek (2008). ¿Revivir el Estado desarrollista? El mito de la 'Burguesía Nacional'. En: Documentos y Aportes en Administración Pública y Gestión Estatal, Vol. 8, No. 11, p. 7-34.
Cho, Yoon-Je y Kim, Joon-Kyung (1997). Credit policies and the industrialization of Korea (Vol. Korea Development Institute). Seoul: World Bank Publications, 160p.
Cimoli, Mario (2005). Heterogeneidad estructural, asimetrías tecnológicas y crecimiento en América Latina. Santiago, Chile: Cepal/BID, 162p.
Cox, Robert (1987). Production, power, and world order: Social forces in the making of history. New York: Columbia University Press, 500p.
Crotty, James y Kang-Kook, Lee (2001). Economic performance in post-crisis Korea: A critical perspective on neoliberal restructuring. En: Seoul Journal of Economics, Vol. 14, No. 2, p.
183-242. Crotty, James y Lee, Kang-Kook (2002). Is financial liberalization good for developing nations?
The case of South Korea in the 1990s. En: Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 34, No. 3, p. 327-334.
Crotty, James y Lee, Kang-Kook (2005). From East Asian 'miracle' to neo-liberal 'mediocrity': the effects of liberalization and financial opening on the post-crisis Korean economy. En:
Global Economic Review, Vol. 34, No. 4, p. 415-434.
Davis, Diane (2004). Discipline and development: middle classes and prosperity in East Asia and Latin America. Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 436p.
Deyo, Frederic (1987). State and labor: Modes of political exclusion in East Asian development, p. 182-202. En: Frederic Deyo (Ed.), The political economy of the new Asian industrialism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 254p.
Dicken, Peter (2011). Global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy. New York: The Guilford Press, 625p.
Doner, Richard (2009). The politics of uneven development: Thailand’s economic growth in comparative perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, 369p.
Doucette, Jamie (2009). The postdevelopmental state: The reconfiguration of political space and the politics of economic reform in South Korea. Tesis doctoral. Vancouver: University
of British Columbia, 336p.
Epstein, Gerald A, Sclesinger, Tom y Vernengo, Matias (2014). Banking, monetary policy and the political economy of financial regulation: Essays in the tradition of Jane D’Arista. Cheltenham y Northampton: Edward Elgar, 392p.
Esser, Klaus (1993). América Latina. Industrialización sin visión. En: Nueva Sociedad, No. 125, p. 27-46.
Estévez-Abe, Margarita (2008). Welfare and capitalism in postwar Japan (Vol. New York): Cambridge University Press, 360p.
Evans, Peter (1998). Alternativas al Estado desarrollista. Lecciones de la crisis de Asia Oriental. En: Nueva Sociedad, No. 155, p. 143-156.
Fajnzylber, Fernando (1983). La Industrialización trunca de América Latina. México D.F.: Editorial Nueva Imagen, 416p.
Fajnzylber, Fernando (1987). Reflexiones sobre las particularidades de América Latina y el sudeste asiático y sus referencias en el mundo industrializado. En: Investigación Económica,
Vol. 46, No. 180, p. 63-109.
Faletto, Enzo (1989). La especificidad del Estado en América latina. En: Revista de La Cepal, No. 38, p. 69-87.
Fernandez, Victor; Lauxmann, Carolina y Trevignani, Manuel (2014). Emergencia del Sur Global. Perspectivas para el desarrollo de la periferia latinoamericana. En: Economia e Sociedade, Vol. 23, No. 3, p. 611-643.
Fernández, Víctor Ramiro (2010). Desarrollo regional bajo transformaciones trans-escalares ¿Por qué y cómo recuperar la escala nacional?, p. 301–341. En: Víctor Ramiro Fernández y CarlosBrandão (Eds.) Escalas y políticas del desarrollo regional. Desafíos para América Latina. Buenos Aires: Editorial Miño y Dávila, 352p.
Fernández, Víctor Ramiro (2013). Doble amenaza, doble debilidad un mismo desafío. Latinoamérica ante la crisis del centro y la desigual emergencia del sur global. Documento de Trabajo del IIETE. Instituto de Investigación Estado, Territorio y Economía. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Santa Fe.
Fernández, Víctor Ramiro y Alfaro, María Belén (2011). Ideas y políticas del desarrollo regional bajo variedades de capitalismo: contribuciones desde la periferia. En: Revista Paranaense de Desenvolvimento, No. 120, p. 57-99.
Fernández, Víctor Ramiro y Bazza, Alcides (2016). Repensando las Variedades de Capitalismo desde la Periferia. En: Desenvolvimento Em Questão, Vol. 14, No. 35, p. 5–34.
Ffrench-Davis, Ricardo (2005). Reforming Latin America’s Economies. After Market Fundamentalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 270p.
Fiori, José Luís (2015). História, estratégia e desenvolvimento: para uma geopolítica do capitalismo. São Paulo: Editorial Boitempo, 277p.
Gereffi, Gary (1989). Rethinking development theory: Insights from East Asia and Latin America. En: Sociological Forum, Vol. 4, No. 4, p. 505-533.
Glassman, Jim (2011). The geoâ€political economy of global production networks. En Geography Compass, Vol. 5, No. 4, p. 154-164.
Gowan, Peter (1999). The global gamble: Washington’s Faustian bid for world dominance. London: Verso, 336p.
Hall, Peter y Soskice, David (2001). An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism, p. 1-70. En: Peter Hall y David Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 560p.
Hart-Landsberg, Martin y Burkett, Paul (2001). Economic crisis and restructuring in South Korea: Beyond the free market-statist debate. En: Critical Asian Studies, Vol. 33, No. 3, p. 403-430.
Henderson, Jeffrey (2011). East Asian transformation: on the political economy of dynamism, governance and crisis. London: Routledge, 184p.
Henderson, Jeffrey y Hulme, David (2002). Globalization, national economic governance and poverty elimination: Insights from East Asia and Eastern Europe. Final Report to the Department for International Development. (Globalisation and Poverty Programme), Project R7861. Jaguaribe, Helio (1979). Autonomía periférica y hegemonía céntrica. En: Estudios Internacionales, Vol. 12, No. 46, p. 91-130.
Jessop, Bob (2015). Comparative Capitalisms and/or Variegated Capitalism, p. 65–82. En: Matthias Ebenau, Ian Bruff y Christopher May (Eds.). New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research: Critical and Global Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 252p.
Ji (2013). The Fall of the Developmental State and the Rise of the Neoliberal State in South Korea: Transformations in Historical, Geographical, and Social Relations, p. 89-134. En: VV.AA. (Ed.), Geo-political Economies of East Asia. Re-locating East Asian Developmental States in their Transnational and Local Contexts. Seoul: Seoul National University Asia Center, 420p.
Johnson, Chalmers (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle: the growth of industrial policy: 1925- 1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 409p.
Jomo, Kwame (2001). Globalisation, liberalisation, poverty and income inequality in Southeast Asia. OECD Development Centre Working Papers, No. 185, 43p.
Jomo, Kwame (2003). Globalization, liberalization and equitable development: lessons from East Asia. Ginebra: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Overarching Concerns Paper, No. 3, 35p.
Jomo, Kwame (2006). Growth with equity in East Asia? En: DESA Working Paper Nº 33, Department of Economic and Social Affairs of United Nations, Nwe York, 54p.
Kasahara, Shigehisa (2004). The Flying Geese Paradigm: A critical study of its application to East Asian regional development. UNCTAD Discussion Papers, No. 169, Ginebra, 34p.
Kay, Cristóbal (2002). Reforma agraria, industrialización y desarrollo: ¿ Por qué Asia Oriental superó a América Latina? En: Debate Agrario, No. 34, p. 45-94.
Kiely, Ray (1998). Neo liberalism revised? A critical account of World Bank concepts of good governance and market friendly intervention. En: Capital & Class, Vol. 22, No. 1, p. 63-88.
Kohli, Atul (2004). State-directed development: political power and industrialization in the global periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 480p.
Kroeber, Arthur (2011). Developmental dreams: Policy and reality in China’s economic reforms, p. 44-65. En: Scott Kennedy (Ed.), Beyond the Middle Kingdom: Comparative perspectives on China’s capitalist transformation. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 280p.
Lee, Eddy (1999). The debate on the causes of the Asian crisis: Crony capitalism versus international system failure. En: International Politics and Society, No. 2, p. 162-167.
Levy, David (2008). Political Contestation in Global Production Networks. En: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, No. 4, p. 943-962. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.34422006
Levy-Orlik, Noemi (2009). Protectionism and industrialization: a critical assessment of the Latin American industrialization period. En: Revista de Economia Política, Vol. 29, No. 4, p.
436-453.
Lim, Hyun-Chin y Jang, Jin-Ho (2006). Neo-liberalism in post-crisis South Korea: Social conditions and outcomes. En: Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 36, No. 4, p. 442-463.
Lim, Linda (1997). The Southeast Asian currency crisis and its aftermath. En Journal of Asian Business, Vol. 13, No. 4, p. 65-83.
Medeiros, Carlos Aguiar de (2010). Instituições e desenvolvimento econômico: uma nota crítica ao' nacionalismo metodológico'. En Economia e Sociedade, Vol. 19, No. 3, p. 637-645.
Ocampo, José (2011). Seis décadas de debates económicos latinoamericanos. En: Initiative for Policy Dialogue, 25 p.
Ocampo, José y Ros, Jaime (2011). Shifting paradigms in Latin America’s economic development,p. 4-25. En José Ocampo y Jaime Ros (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Latin American Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 896p.
O’Donnell, Guillermo (1973). Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism: Studies in South American politics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 219p.
O’Donnell, Guillermo (2009). El Estado burocrático autoritario 1966-1973: triunfos, derrotas y crisis. Buenos Aires: Prometeo, 499p.
Öniş, Ziya (1991). The logic of the developmental state. En: Comparative Politics, Vol. 24, No. 1, p. 109-126.
Ozawa, Terutomo (2002). The 'hidden' side of the 'flying-geese' catch-up model: Japan’s dirigiste institutional setup and a deepening financial morass. En: Journal of Asian Economics,
Vol. 12, No. 4, p. 471-491.
Ozawa, Terutomo (2011). The (Japanâ€born) ‘flyingâ€geese’ theory of economic development revisited– and reformulated from a structuralist perspective. En: Global Policy, Vol. 2, No. 3,
p. 272-285.
Palma, José Gabriel (2009). The revenge of the market on the rentiers. Why neo-liberal reports of the end of history turned out to be premature. En: Cambridge Journal of Economics,
Vol. 33, No. 4, p. 829-869.
Park, S.J. (2013). Developmental state in Korea (60-70ties) revisited: Institution-building for the making of 'coordinated market. En: Ordnungspolitische Diskurse, Working Paper, No. 2013-02, 30p.
Peck, Jamie y Theodore, Nik (2007). Variegated capitalism. En: Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 31, No. 6, p. 731-772. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309132507083505
Pempel, Thomas J (1999). The developmental regime in a changing world economy, p. 137-181.
En: Meredith Woo-Cummings (Ed.), The developmental state. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 368p.
Portantiero, Juan Carlos (1989). La múltiple transformación del Estado latinoamericano. En: Nueva sociedad, No. 104, p. 88-94.
Portes, Alejandro y Hoffman, Kelly (2003). La estructura de clases en América Latina: composición y cambios durante la era neoliberal. En: Desarrollo Económico, Vol. 43, No. 171, p. 355-387. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3455890
Prebisch, Raúl (1981). Capitalismo periférico. Crisis y transformación. México D.F., Fondo de Cultura Económica, 344p.
Prebisch, Raúl (1986). El desarrollo económico de la América Latina y algunos de sus principales problemas. En: Desarrollo Económico, Vol. 26, No. 103, p. 479-502.
Rosenberger, Leif (1997). Southeast Asia’s currency crisis: a diagnosis and prescription. En: Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 19, Nº 3, p. 223.
Ross, John (2008). India and China’s challenge in the current economic crisis. Key Trends in Globalisation: 20 years of accurate predictions on China and the world economy. 30 de noviembre.
Sassen, Saskia (2010). Global inter-city networks and commodity chains: any intersections? En: Global Networks, Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 150-163.
Ben Ross (2009). Hierarchical market economies and varieties of capitalism in Latin America. En: Journal of Latin American Studies, Vol. 41, No. 03, p. 553-575.
Schneider, Ben Ross (2013). Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 262p.
Schneider, Ben Ross y Soskice, David (2009). Inequality in developed countries and Latin America: coordinated, liberal and hierarchical systems. En: Economy and society, Vol. 38, No.
1, p. 17-52.
Schoppa, Leonard (2006). Race for the Exits. The Unraveling of Japan’s System of Social Protection. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 272p.
Schuldt, Jürgen y Acosta, Alberto (2006). Petróleo, rentismo y subdesarrollo: ¿una maldición sin solución? En: Nueva sociedad, No. 204, p. 71-89.
Shin, Kwang-Yeong (2010). Globalisation and the working class in South Korea: Contestation, fragmentation and renewal. En: Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 40, No. 2, p. 211-229.
Soto, Roberto (2013). América Latina: Entre la financiarización y el financiamiento productivo. En: Problemas del desarrollo, Vol. 44, No. 173, p. 57-78.
Sunkel, Osvaldo (1971). Desarrollo, subdesarrollo, dependencia, marginación y desigualdades espaciales; hacia un enfoque totalizante. En: Investigación Económica, Vol. 31, No. 121, p. 23-77.
Tachibanaki, Toshiaki (2006). Inequality and poverty in Japan. En: Japanese Economic Review, Vol. 57, No. 1, p. 1-27.
Thurbon, Elizabeth (2003). Ideational inconsistency and institutional incapacity: Why financial liberalisation in South Korea went horribly wrong. En: New Political Economy, Vol. 8, No.
3, p. 341-361.
Vu, Tuong (2007). State formation and the origins of developmental states in South Korea and Indonesia. En: Studies in comparative international development, Vol. 41, No. 4, p. 27-56.
Wade, Robert (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 456p.
Wade, Robert y Veneroso, Frank (1998). The Asian crisis: the high debt model versus the Wall Street-Treasury-IMF complex. En: New Left Review, No. 228, p. 3-23.
Woo-Cumings, Meredith (1999). The developmental state: Cornell University Press, 368p.
Yeung, Henry Wai-chung (2000). State intervention and neoliberalism in the globalizing world economy: lessons from Singapore’s regionalization programme. En: The Pacific Review,
Vol. 13, No. 1, p. 133-162.
Zysman, John (1983). Governments, markets, and growth: financial systems and the politics of industrial change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 358p.