Advance Search

Estimación de los efectos de las habilidades e intensidad en el uso de las TIC en el desempeño académico

John Ariza | Bio
Universidad del Tolima
Karen Reinoso | Bio
Universidad del Tolima
Copyright and Licensing:

Copyright (c) 2023 Semestre Económico

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

In this paper we study the effect of intensity in the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) on the academic performance of 15-year-old students using the PISA 2018 international test database. Based on a quantile regression model and considering differential in the skill level in the management of ICT, we estimate the effect of the intensity of its use in school and at home on different parts of the distribution of skills in the areas of reading and mathematics. Results suggest differential effects of the intensity of use on academic performance according to the place of access and with the level of ICT skills. Students with low and medium ICT proficiency levels show ne

PDF (Español)
PDF (Español)

References

  1. Agasisti, T., Gil-Izquierdo, M. y Han, S. W. (2020). ICT Use at home for school-related tasks: what is the effect on a student’s achievement? Empirical evidence from OECD PISA data. Education Economics, 28(6), 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2020.1822787
  2. Alderete, M. V., Di Meglio, G. y Formichella, M. M. (2017). Acceso a las TIC y rendimiento educativo: ¿una relación potenciada por su uso? Un análisis para España. Revista Educacion, 377, 54-81.
  3. Carnoy, M. (2006). Economía de la Educación. Editorial UOC Cerquera, O. (2014). Estado del Arte del Rendimiento Académico en la Educación Media. Rhec, 17(1).
  4. Chica, S., Galvis, D. y Ramírez, A. (2012). Determinantes del rendimiento académico en Colombia: Pruebas ICFES Saber 11º, 2009. Revista Universidad Eafit, 4(160). 48-72.
  5. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (Cepal). (2010). Monitoreo del Plan eLAC2010: Avances y desafíos de la Sociedad de la Información en América Latina y el Caribe. Documento de proyecto Cepal.
  6. Eickelmann, B., Gerick, J. y Koop, C. (2016). ICT use in mathematics lessons and the mathematics achievement of secondary school students by international comparison: Which role do school level factors play? Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1527–1551.
  7. Fang, H., Linden, L. L. y MacLeod, M. (2008). How to Teach English in India: Testing the Relative Productivity of Instruction Methods within the Pratham English Language Education Program. Columbia Universit; Working Paper.
  8. Formichella, M. M. y Alderete, M. V. (2018). TIC en la escuela y rendimiento educativo: el efecto mediador del uso de las TIC en el hogar. Cuadernos de Investigación Educativa, 9(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.18861/cied.2018.9.1.2822
  9. Fuchs, T. y Woessmann, L. (2004). Computers and Student Learning: Bivariate and Multivariate Evidence on the Availability and Use of Computers at Home and at School. CESIFO Working Paper. http://SSRN.com/abstract=619101
  10. Gamboa, L. y García, A. (2011). Access to computer and academic achievement. Where is it best: at home or at school? Center for Studies on inequality and development. Discussion paper, (47).
  11. Gubbels, J., Swart, N. M. y Groen, M. A. (2020). Everything in moderation: ICT and reading performance of Dutch 15‑year‑olds. Large-scale Assessments Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2018.v4i2.4956
  12. Harris, M. (2015). The educational digital divide: A research synthesis of digital inequity in education. https://mattharrisedd.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/The-Educational-Digital-Divide-Matt-Harris-Ed.D..pdf
  13. Hanushek, E. A. (1979). Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of educational production functions. The Journal of Human Resources, 14(3), 351-388.
  14. Hu, X., Gong, Y., Lai, C. y Leung, F. K. (2018). The relationship between ICT and student literacy in mathematics, reading, and science across 44 countries: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 125, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.021
  15. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2018). Measuring the information society report. Executive summary 2018. Statistical reports. ITU Publications, Geneva. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/ind/D-IND-ICTOI-2018-SUM-PDF-E.pdf
  16. Jola, A. (2011). Determinantes de la calidad de la educación media en Colombia: un análisis de los resultados PISA 2006 y del plan sectorial “Revolución Educativa”. Coyuntura Económica: Investigación Económica y Social, XLI(1), 25-61.
  17. Koenker R. y Bassett G. (1978). Regression Quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33-50.
  18. Koenker, R. y Hallock, K. (2001). Quantile Regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4): 143-156.
  19. Linden, L. L. (2008). Complement or Substitute? The Effect of Technology on Student Achievement in India.Columbia University; Working Paper.
  20. Martínez-Garrido, C. (2018). Impacto del uso de los recursos tecnológicos en el rendimiento
  21. académico. Innoeduca, International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, 4(2), 138.https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2018.v4i2.4956
  22. Mediavilla, M. y Escardíbul, J. O. (2015). El efecto de las TIC en la adquisición de competencias. Un análisis de género y titularidad de centro en las evaluaciones por ordenador. Review of Public Economics, 212, 67-96.
  23. Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (OECD). (2015). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection, PISA. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en
  24. Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (OECD). (2016). Skills Matter: Further Results from the Survey of Adult Skills. OECD Skills Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264258051-en
  25. Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (OECD). (2017). PISA 2015 Technical Report. OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/sitedocument/PISA-2015-technical-report-final.pdf
  26. Petko, D., Cantieni, A. y Prasse, D. (2016). Perceived Quality of Educational Technology Matters: A Secondary Analysis of Students’ ICT Use, ICT-Related Attitudes, and PISA 2012 Test Scores. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(8), 1070–1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116649373
  27. Posada J. y Mendoza F. (2014). Determinantes del logro académico de los estudiantes de grado 11 en el periodo 2008 – 2010. Una perspectiva de género y región. Estudios sobre calidad de la educación en Colombia. Working paper. ICFES.
  28. Posso, A. (2016). Internet Usage and Educational Outcomes Among 15-Year-Old Australian Students. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3851–3876.
  29. Sierra, L. L. (2017). Maestros, apropiación de TICs y desempeño escolar en Colombia (Teachers, ICT Appropriation and School Performance in Colombia). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3047310
  30. Skryabin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, L. y Zhang, D. (2015). How the ICT development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science. Computers & Education, 85, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.004
  31. Spiezia, V. (2010). Does Computer Use Increase Educational Achievements? Student-level Evidence from PISA. OECD Journal: Economic Studies 2010, (1),1-22.
  32. Zhang, D. y Liu, L. (2016). How Does ICT Use Influence Students’ Achievements in Math and Science Over Time? Evidence from PISA 2000 to 2012. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(9), 2431-2449. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1297a
How to Cite
Ariza, J., & Reinoso, K. (2023). Estimación de los efectos de las habilidades e intensidad en el uso de las TIC en el desempeño académico. Semestre Económico, 25(59), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22395/seec.v25n59a6

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel

We are indexed in