Managerial Decisions that Explain the Growth in Colombian Agribusiness
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Economic growth continues to be one of the most relevant and exciting subareas of economic and managerial decisions. Therefore, the relationship between economic growth and profitability is crucial. However, for business decisions, relevance focuses on the risk-return trade-off, which explains rationality in decision-making. Using a balanced panel data of 418 Agri-food Colombian firms from to 2008-2015 period, we add empirical evidence regarding the effect of the risk-return trade-off to explain the growth path. Firstly, the paper studies the influence of the growth measure for different business sizes. Secondly, the risk-return trade-off, based on the Sharpe ratio explains rational evidence in the growth decisions. The Sharpes ratio is an appropriate measure for ensuring the survival of companies and their long-term competitiveness. This finding also suggests that other contextual variables, such as age, size, or region, can explain the growth path. Finally, the study of growth by sub-period of the economic cycle is broken down to validate the profiles of these companies during periods of economic recession. As future lines of work, there is the study of the relationship between business efficiency or survival and the growth and profitability/risk parameters analyzed.
Detalhes do artigo
Referências
Anyadike-Danes, M., Hart, M., & Du, J. (2015). Firm dynamics and job creation in the United Kingdom: 1998-2013. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 12-27. DOI: 10.1177/0266242614552334
Aparicio, S., Urbano, D., & Gómez, D. (2016). The role of innovative entrepreneurship within Colombian business cycle scenarios: A system dynamics approach. Futures, 81, 130-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.02.004
Arauzo-Carod, J. M., Liviano-Solis, D., & Manjón-Antolín, M. (2010). Empirical studies in the industrial location: An assessment of their methods and results. Journal of Regional Science, 50(3), 685-711. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00625.x
Bartz, W., & Winkler, A. (2016). Flexible or fragile? The growth performance of small and young businesses during the global financial crisis- Evidence from Germany. Journal of Business Venturing, 31, 196-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.10.002
Bottazzi, G., Li, L., & Secchi, A. (2019). Aggregate fluctuations and the distribution of firm growth rates. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28 (3), 635-656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtz016
Business Information and Reporting System. (2018). https://www.supersociedades.gov.co
Calvo, J. L. (2006). Testing Gibrat’s Law for Small, Young, and Innovating Firms. Small Business Economics, 26 (2), 117-123. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-004-2135-5
Choi, B. P. (2010). The U.S. Property and Liability Insurance Industry: Firm Growth, Size, and Age. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 13(2), 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 6296.2010.01181.x
Ciftci, I., Tatoglu, E., Wood, G., Demirbag, M., & Zaim, S. (2019). Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey. International Business Review, 28, 90-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.08.004
Coad, A., Cowling, M., & Siepel, J. (2017). Growth processes of high-growth firms as a four-dimensional chicken and egg. Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(4), 537-554. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtw040
Coad, A., Frankish, J. S., Roberts, R. G., & Storey, D. J. (2015). Are firm growth paths random? A reply to «Firm growth and the illusion of randomness.' Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2014.11.001
Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2016). Innovation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role?. Research Policy, 45, 387-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.015
Coad, A., Holm, J. R., Krafft, J., & Quatraro, F. (2018). Firm age and performance. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28 (1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-017-0532-6
Confecámaras. (2022). Dinámicas de movilidad y crecimiento de las empresas colombianas. Confecámaras (Colombia). https://confecamaras.org.co/phocadownload/2022/Dinámicas_de_Movilidad_y_Crecimiento_de_las_Empresas_Colombianas_-_2022.pdf
DANE. (2022). Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. https://www.dane.gov.co/
Dar, A., & AmirKhalkhali, S. (2015). On the growth process of firms: does size matter?. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 14 (3), 477-484. DOI: 10.19030/iber.v14i3.9217
Daunfeldt, S.O., Johansson, D., & Halvarsson, D. (2015). Using the Eurostat-EOCD definition of high-growth firms: A cautionary note. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 4 (1), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-05-2013-0020
Delage, E., & Yu-Meng, Li, J. (2018). Minimizing risk exposure when the choice of a risk measure is ambiguous. Management Science, 64 (1), 327-344. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2593
Distante, R., Petrella, I., & Santoro, E. (2018). Gibrat’s Law and quantile regressions: an application to firm growth. Economic Letters, 164, 5-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.12.028
Duschl, M., Scholl, T., Brenner, T., Luxen, D., & Raschke, F. (2015). Industry-specific firm growth and agglomeration. Regional Studies, 49 (11), 1822-1839. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.861059
Eberhat, R., Eesley, C., & Eisenhardt, K. (2017). A failure is an option: Institutional change, entrepreneurial risk, and new firm growth. Organization Science, 28 (1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1110
Evans, D. (1987). Test of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 95 (4), 657-674. https://doi.org/10.1086/261480
Fiala, R., & Hedija, V. (2015). Gibrat’s Law and empirical studies. 10th International Scientific Conference Financial Management of Firms and Financial Institutions. VSB-TU of Ostrava, Faculty of Economics, Department of Finance, 254-262.
Fiala, R. (2017). Testing convergence toward Gibrat’s Law for Czech manufacturing firms. Ekonomicky Casopis, 65(8), 737-750. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-08-2017-0056.
Gibrat, R. (1931). Les Inégalités Économiques. Paris, Librairie du Recueil Sirey.
Giner, J. M., Santa-María, M. J., & Fuster, A. (2017). High-growth firms: does location matter? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(1), 75-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0392-9
Greene, W.H. (2008). Econometric Analysis. 6th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Hermans, J., Vanderstraeten, J., Van Witteloostuijn, A., Dejardin, M., Ramdani, D., & Stam, E. (2015). Ambitious entrepreneurship: A review of growth aspirations, intentions, and expectations. Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, 17, 127-160. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1074-754020150000017011
Hervas-Oliver, J.L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Rojas Alvarado, R., & Estellés-Miguel, S. (2018). Agglomerations and firm performance: who benefits and how much? Regional Studies, 52 (3), 338-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1297895
Höhler, J., & Kühl, R. (2016). Do growth rates depend on the initial firm size? Evidence for the German agribusiness. German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(4), 231-243. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.284980
Keselman, H. J., Kowalchuk, R. K., Algina, J., Lix, L. M., & Wilcox, R. R. (2000). Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: Trimmed means and bootstrapping. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 53, 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711000159286
Langebaek, A. (2008). Determinantes del crecimiento de las empresas no financieras en Colombia: Ley de Gibrat y otras teorías. Borradores de Economía, 493(4), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.32468/be.493
Megaravalli, A. V., & Sampagnaro, G. (2017). The validity of gibrat law: Evidence from a panel of selected Indian firms. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 21(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org//10.1177/097324700800400404
Mundt, P., Alfarano, S., & Milaković, M. (2016). ‘Gibrat’s Law Redux: Think profitability instead of growth. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(4), 549-571. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/icc/dtv022
Neffke, F., Otto, A., & Weyh, A. (2017). Inter-industry labor flows. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 142, 275-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.07.003
OECD. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. OECD, JRC European Commission.
Peric, M., & Vitezic, V. (2016). Impact of the global economic crisis on firm growth. Small Business Economics, 46, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9671-z
Pérez Valbuena, G. J., & Meisel Roca, A. (2014). Ley de Zipf y de Gibrat para Colombia y sus regiones: 1835-2005. Revista de Historia Economica - Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History, 32(2), 247-286. https://doi.org/10.1017/S021261091400007X
Photopoulos, G., & Giotopoulos, I. (2010). Gibrat’s law and persistence of growth in Greek manufacturing. Small Business Economics, Springer, 35(2), pages 191-202, September.
Rivera, J., & Ruiz, D. (2011). Análisis del desempeño financiero de empresas innovadoras del Sector Alimentos y Bebidas en Colombia. Pensamiento & Gestión. (31):109-136.
Sharpe, W. (1966). Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Business, 39(1), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1086/294846
Spescha, A., & Woerter, M. (2019). Innovation and Firm Growth over the Business Cycle. Industry and Innovation, 26 (3), 321-347. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2018.1431523
Vorst, P., & Lombardi, T. (2018). Life cycle models and forecasting growth and profitability. The Accounting Review, 93 (6), 357-381. 1 https://doi.org/0.2308/accr-52091
Wooldridge, J. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data. 2nd Edition. The MIT Press.
World Economic Forum. (2017). The global competitiveness report 2017-2018.Ed. World Economic Forum