Law 1996 of 2019. Procedural Aspects Related to Repeals, Validities and Regime Transition

Abstract

This article aims to address the study of the transition regime of the 1996 law of 2019 and carry out an analysis of the procedural impact that this entails in the face of ongoing processes, those already completed and those that can be advanced, and the impact on other jurisdictional processes related to this issue. For this, an analytical theoretical study was carried out, since, based on what is established in the forementioned law and jurisprudence, the way in which the new capacity regime generates great changes in the jurisdictional process requires an interpretation adjusted to the National Constitution. To conclude that when moving from the incapacity regime to the capacity regime, not only a paradigm shift was generated in terms of aspects of a substantial nature, but also had a great impact on the procedural law rules from the point of view of repeal of norms, the coming into force of others, regarding the procedure that can be initiated in the transition regime, as well as the suspension of the processes in progress and the regulation of the processes that were legally completed at the time of entry into the validity of the law 1996 of 2019.