Beyond the Corrective Justice? Possibilities to Land Restitution after Solving the Armed Conflicts
Article Sidebar
You are free to:
Share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license.
Under the following terms:
Acknowledgment:
You must give proper credit , provide a link to the license , and indicate if any changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any manner that suggests that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Non-Commercial:
You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No Additional Restrictions:
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license allows.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for items of material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No guarantees are given. The license may not give you all the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Restitution of lands, as a reparation instrument within the context
of transitional justice, has important tools for executing an action
articulated to the agricultural social justice objectives included
in the constitutional law and the international human rights law.
Challenges resulting from the implementation of the restitution,
in scenarios where armed conflict has been mainly caused by
social inequality, justify this articulation and reflect the need for it.
Explicitness and analytical identification of these meeting points
comprise the main intention of this article. The theoretical reference
turns around the possibility of having a corrective justice to achieve
social and redistributive justice.