Exegesis on the constitutionality of the provisional custodians in corporate conflicts
Article Sidebar
You are free to:
Share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license.
Under the following terms:
Acknowledgment:
You must give proper credit , provide a link to the license , and indicate if any changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any manner that suggests that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Non-Commercial:
You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No Additional Restrictions:
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license allows.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for items of material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No guarantees are given. The license may not give you all the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Main Article Content
Abstract
For this article, based on the right to freedom of initiative, is discussed the constitutionality of judicial measure that determines the intervention in business corporations in conflict through provisional custodians. For this, it was chosen the hypothetical-deductive method of approach, starting with the categorization
of free enterprise as a fundamental right. Subsequently, the panorama of the said judicial measures is presented. More than seek and provide a simple answer, are drawn constitutionality metric modeled on arguments based on the theory of fundamental rights and corporate law. As a main result, it was seen that, even if
judicial intervention happen to the appointment of third parties for commercial administrator role, it preserves the essential nucleus of free enterprise and the social and extra-social corporate interests that surround the business organization, performing, abstractly, as a legitimate and constitutional measure.