Fellowship of Law and Violence
Article Sidebar
You are free to:
Share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license.
Under the following terms:
Acknowledgment:
You must give proper credit , provide a link to the license , and indicate if any changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any manner that suggests that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Non-Commercial:
You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No Additional Restrictions:
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license allows.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for items of material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No guarantees are given. The license may not give you all the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article’s main goal is displaying the existence of three political theories that might be used for justifying the professional fellowship of lawyers; the corporatism, the pluralism, the republicanism. The political theory adopted will determine the conception of the functions that the lawyer’s fellowships perform in its relationship with the State. This work specifically focuses on showing that the fellowship functions as a limit for institutional violence when the adopted paradigm is a republican one.
Article Details
References
Arendt, H. (1963). On Revolution. Nueva York: Viking Press.
Auyero, J. (2000). The hyper-shantytown: Neo-liberal violence(s) in the Argentine slum. Ethnography, 1(1), 93-116.
Bailey, J. (1977). Pluralist and corporatist dimension of interest representation in Colombia. En J. M. Malloy (Ed.), Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America (pp. 259-302). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Barak, G. (2003). Violence and nonviolence: pathways to understanding. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Berlin, I. (2002). Two Concepts of Liberty. En H. Hardy (Ed.), Liberty (pp. 166-217). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bisig, E. (2014). Del disciplinamiento a la exclusión social: circulación de los jóvenes en la ciudad. En E. Bisig (Ed.),  Jóvenes y seguridad: control social y estrategias punitivas de exclusión Código de Faltas Provincia de Córdoba (pp. 117-134). Córdoba: Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales.
Borras, S. y Ross, E. (2007). Land Rights, Conflict, and Violence Amid Neo-Liberal Globalization. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 19, 1-4.
Bruff, I. (2016). Neoliberalism and authoritarianism. En S. Springer, K. Birch y J. MacLeavy (Eds.), The Handbook of Neoliberalism (pp. 107-117). Nueva York: Routledge.
Celesia, F. y Waisberg, P. (2016). La noche de las corbatas: cuando la dictadura silenció a los abogados de los trabajadores. Buenos Aires: Aguilar.
Chatterjee, I. (2009). Social conflict and the neoliberal city: a case of Hindu-Muslim violence in India. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34(2), 143-160.
Chubb, J. (1983). Interest groups and the bureaucracy: the politics of energy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Coffey, J. (2003). Léon Harmel: Entrepreneur as Catholic Social Reformer. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Coleman, L. (2007). The Gendered Violence of Development: Imaginative Geographies of Exclusion in the Imposition of Neo-Liberal Capitalism. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9, 204-219.
Collier, C. (2008). Neoliberalism and Violence against Women: Can Retrenchment Convergence Explain the Path of Provincial Anti-Violence Policy, 1985-2005? Canadian Journal of Political Science, 41, 19-42.
Cox, A. y O’Sullivan, N. (1988). The Corporate State: Corporatism and the State Tradition in Western Europe. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Dahl, R. (1956). A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dahl, R. (1958). Hierarchy, Democracy and Bargaining in Politics and Economics. En H. Eulau, S. Eldersveld y M. Janowitz (Eds.), Political Behavior. A Reader in Theory and Research. Glencoe: The Free Press.
Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Espoz, M. B. (2009). La ciudad y las ciudades-barrio: tensión y conflicto a partir de una lectura de la producción mediática de miedos en el marco de espacios urbanos socio-segregados. Â Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios sobre Cuerpos, Emociones y Sociedad, (1), 78-87
Goldstein, D. (2005). Flexible Justice: Neoliberal Violence and ‘Self-Help’ Security in Bolivia. Critique of Anthropology, 25, 389-411.
Hanson, E. (1987). The Catholic Church in World Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lovett, F. (2012). Harrington’s Empire of Law. Political Studies, 60, 59-75.
Malloy, J. M. (1977). Authoritarianism and corporatism in Latin America: the modal pattern. En J. M. Malloy (Ed.), Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America (pp. 3–22). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Marchand, M. (2004). Neo-liberal Disciplining, Violence and Transnational Organizing: The struggle for women’s rights in Ciudad Juárez. Development, 47, 88-93.
Ortiz, E. R. (2015). El derecho víctima del terrorismo de Estado 1975-1980. Río Cuarto: UniRío.
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pettit, P. (2012). On The People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pocock, J. G. A. (1975). The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rahe, P. (1992). Republics Ancient and Modern: Classical Republicanism and the American Revolution. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Schmitter, P. y Lehmbruch, G. (Eds.). (1985). Patterns of Corporatist Policy Making. Londres: Macmillan.
Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Nueva York: Harper and Row.
Sellers, S. (1994). American Republicanism: Roman Ideology in the United States Constitution. Nueva York: New York University Press.
Skinner, Q. (2002). A Third Concept of Liberty. Proceedings of the British Academy, 117, 237-268.
Viroli, M. (2002). Republicanism. Nueva York: Hill and Wang.