The Absence of Clarity in the Ontology of Restorative Justice through its Application Ways in the Mexican Context
Article Sidebar
You are free to:
Share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license.
Under the following terms:
Acknowledgment:
You must give proper credit , provide a link to the license , and indicate if any changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any manner that suggests that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Non-Commercial:
You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No Additional Restrictions:
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license allows.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for items of material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No guarantees are given. The license may not give you all the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Main Article Content
Abstract
It is undeniable that restorative justice has been widely studied from very different theoretical perspectives. Currently, there is still no consensus on its definition or its application ways. This lack of clarification, far from motivating a debate in pro of its scientific construction, generates confusion and lack of clarity in the legislation texts that encompass it, thus negatively influencing the conflict’s actor in case of a mala praxis originated in the absence of concretion. This work pretends to attend to that lack of clarity through personal reflection by giving importance, thus, to the need for clarity regarding the ways of application of restorative justice. All this with the purpose of establishing protocols that allow the development of efficient interventions that are centered around its objectives. The answer to this question is not a critical one, but an exposition of the areas of opportunity to be worked from academia and the professional branch to achieve an adequate strengthening of restorative justice in general and its application ways in particular.
Article Details
References
Barboni, L. (2013). Prácticas restaurativas: otra mirada a la respuesta penal a los adolescentes en infracción. Revista de la Facultad de Derecho, (35), 55-73. https://revista.fder.edu.uy/index.php/rfd/article/view/180
Britto, D. (2010). Justicia restaurativa: reflexiones sobre la experiencia de Colombia. Editorial de la Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja.
Choya, N. (2015). Justicia Restaurativa: nuevas perspectivas en mediación. Revista Pensamiento Penal. https://bit.ly/3wzGgGV
Díaz, F. (s. f.). Unidad I. Orígenes y concepto. En Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (org.), Cátedra virtual Justicia Restaurativa, Módulo III: orígenes de la Justicia Restaurativa. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (Cali). https://mediacionyviolenciaescolar.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/origenes-iii1.pdf
Maltos, M. (2017). La justicia restaurativa en las leyes 'nacionales' mexicanas. Sistemas Judiciales, 16(20), 34-47. https://bit.ly/3eijVXM
Molina, M. (2010). Justicia restaurativa en materia penal: una aproximación. Letras Jurídicas: Revista Electrónica de Derecho, (11). https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3702719
Oficina de las Naciones Unidad para las Drogas y el Crimen (Unodc). (2006). Manual sobre programas de justicia restaurativa. Naciones Unidas. https://bit.ly/2ULQx5s
Pellón, M. y Palladino, M. (2010). La ‘’mano dura’’ no resuelve el problema de la delincuencia juvenil. Archivos de Criminología, Seguridad Privada y Criminalística, (5), 1-4. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5255892
Presidencia de la República de los Estado Unidos de México. (2014a, 5 de marzo). Código Nacional de Procedimientos Penales (CNPP). Diario Oficial de la Federación. http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/CNPP_190221.pdf
Presidencia de la República de los Estados Unidos de México. (2014b, 29 de diciembre). Ley Nacional de Mecanismos Alternativos de Solución de Controversias en Materia Penal. Diario Oficial de la Federación. http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LNMASCMP_200521.pdf
Presidencia de la República de los Estados Unidos de México. (2016a, 16 de junio). Ley Nacional de Ejecución Penal (LNEP). Diario Oficial de la Federación. http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LNEP_090518.pdf
Presidencia de la República de los Estados Unidos de México. (2016b, 16 de junio). Ley Nacional del Sistema Integral de Justicia Penal para Adolescentes. http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/ref/lnsijpa/LNSIJPA_orig_16jun16.pdf
Sáenz, K. A., y González, D. K. (2016). Desarrollo de la justicia restaurativa en el ámbito de la violencia doméstica. Revista de la Facultad de Derecho, (40), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.22187/rdf2016110
Salvador, B. (2020). El impacto terapéutico de la mediación penal en el aumento de la empatía en el caso de los ofensores [tesis doctoral, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León]. Repositorio Académico Digital. http://eprints.uanl.mx/20717/
Wachtel, T. (2012). Defining Restorative. Bethlehem. International Institute for Restorative Practices. https://www.iirp.edu/pdf/Defining-Restorative.pdf
Walgrave, L. (2008). Restorative Justice, Self-Interest and Responsible Citizenship. Editorial Willan.