Evidentiary Reasoning and Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of the Judicial Proof
Article Sidebar
You are free to:
Share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license.
Under the following terms:
Acknowledgment:
You must give proper credit , provide a link to the license , and indicate if any changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any manner that suggests that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Non-Commercial:
You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No Additional Restrictions:
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license allows.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for items of material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No guarantees are given. The license may not give you all the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article shows a structured process through the use of the 'Intelligent Judge' expert system, to assist judges in the construction of inferences or evidentiary arguments based on the evidence, facts, and hypotheses or allegations that are considered in the stages of evidentiary activity in the judicial process. The analytical-synthetic method is used in the construction of these inferences or evidential arguments. The aforementioned process integrates, in a synergic way, the reasoning and the experience of the human judge with the precision and speed of artificial intelligence for the production of the judgement that decides the judicial process.
Article Details
References
Cohen, L. J. (2017). Lo probable y lo demostrable (O. Vargas, ed. & C. Ruiz, trad.) Ed. 1 Vol. 1. Orión Vargas.
Cohen, L. J. (2021). Un ensayo sobre la creencia y la aceptación (O. Vargas, ed. & C. Ruiz, trad.) Ed. 1 Vol. 1. Orión Vargas.
Jaramillo, A., & Vargas, O. (2020, 18th December). Prueba e inferencia. Una reflexión. Ámbito Jurídico, 6. https://www.ambitojuridico.com/noticias/penal/penal/prueba-e-inferencia-una-reflexion
Jaramillo, A. F., Mosquera, L. E. & Jaramillo, M. L. (2021). La inferencia razonable como estándar de prueba en materia penal en Colombia [Master’s Thesis, Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana]. Repositorio Institucional UNAULA. http://repository.unaula.edu.co:8080/handle/123456789/1566
Schum, D. A. (2016). Los fundamentos probatorios del razonamiento probabilístico (O. Vargas, trad.) Ed. 1, Vol 1. Orión Vargas.
Tecuci, G., Marcu, D., Boicu, M. & Schum, D. A. (2016). Knowledge engineering : building cognitive assistants for evidence-based reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
Tecuci, G., Schum, D. A., Marcu, D., & Boicu, M. (2016). Intelligence analysis as discovery of evidence, hypotheses, and arguments : connecting the dots. Cambridge University Press.
Vargas, O. (2019). El razonamiento inductivo en la valoración de la prueba judicial. Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
Vargas, O. (2021). Teoría de la prueba con énfasis en razonamiento probatorio [curso]. Universidad de Medellín. https://uvirtualabierta.udem.edu.co/course/view.php?id=14
Vargas, O., Hincapié, J., Sepúlveda, L. & Pabón, L. (2021). Juez Inteligente. Sistema experto que asiste al juez en la valoración de la prueba judicial [proyecto de investigación, Universidad de Medellín]. https://investigaciones-pure.udem.edu.co/es/projects/el-juez-inteligente-modelaci%C3%B3n-de-unagente-cognitivo-sistema-exp
Wigmore, J. H. (1937). The science of judicial proof, as given by logic, psychology, and general experience, and illustrated in judicial trials. Little, Brown.
Zadeh, L. A. (1983). The role of fuzzy logic in the management of uncertainty in expert systems. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 11(1), 199-227.
Zadeh, L . A., & Yager, R. R. (1987). Fuzzy sets and applications : selected papers by L.A. Zadeh. Wiley.