The Right to Extimacy and the Technological-Neoliberal Social Control
Article Sidebar
You are free to:
Share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license.
Under the following terms:
Acknowledgment:
You must give proper credit , provide a link to the license , and indicate if any changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any manner that suggests that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Non-Commercial:
You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No Additional Restrictions:
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license allows.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for items of material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No guarantees are given. The license may not give you all the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research has as its subject the right to extimacy and its relationship with the practices of technological control provided by neoliberal rationality. Based on this, the proposed research problem is: what is lost with the exercise of the right to extimacy in the current techno-neoliberal context? The general objective is focused on determining the affectation of this right and, in the same way, understanding the dimensions that are interconnected through current technological control devices and the domain of neoliberal logics applied to the governmentality of life. To achieve these purposes, we adopted the phenomenological-hermeneutic approach method, which takes as its object of investigation a way of 'being in the world', in which the parameters of the observer are inserted, complemented by the method of monographic procedure and the technique of indirect documentation research with bibliographic emphasis. Based on these considerations, we concluded that spaces for individual, social and democratic construction are lost with the current practices of technological-neoliberal control exercised over extimacy, capturing it as part of the capitalist dynamic and reducing its meaning in the construction of subjectivities in favor of the commodification of life and the precariousness of social relations.
Article Details
References
Arendt, H. (2010). A condição humana (11ª ed.). Forense Universitária.
Bauman, Z. (2012). Isto não é um diário. Zahar.
Beiguelman, G. (2021). Políticas da imagem: vigilância e resistência na dadosfera. Ubu.
Bilge, S. (2009). Théorisations féministes de l’intersectionnalité. Diogène, (225), 70-88. https://doi.org/10.3917/dio.225.0070
Bolesina, I. (2017). O direito à extimidade: as inter-relações entre identidade, ciberespaço e privacidade. Empório do Direito.
Brown, W. (2019). Nas ruínas do neoliberalismo: a ascensão da política antidemocrática no ocidente. Politeia.
Brown, W. (2021). Sofrendo de direitos como paradoxos. Revista Direito Público, 18(97), 459-474. https://www.portaldeperiodicos.idp.edu.br/direitopublico/article/view/5409
Butler, J. (2018). Corpos em aliança e a política das ruas: notas para uma teoria performativa de assembleia. Civilização Brasileira.
Cardon, D. (2012). A democracia internet: promessas e limites. Forense Universitária.
Chan, M. S., Jones, C. R. J, Jamieson, K. H. & Albarracín, D (2017). Debunking: A meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of messages countering misinformation. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1531-1546. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0956797617714579
Citron, D. K. & Franks, M. A. (2014). Criminalizing revenge porn. Wake Forest L. Rev., 49, 345-. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2368946
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8/
Dardot, P. & Laval, C. (2013). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. Verso Trade.
Deleuze, G. (1992). ´Post-scriptum´ sobre as sociedades de controle. Conversações (1972 - 1990). Editora 34.
Dias, F. da V. & Kampff, L. C. (2020). Algoritmos de manipulação: um retrato da fantasia fake no Brasil. In J. Saberiego, A. J. do Amaral & E. B. C. Salles (orgs.). Algoritarismos (pp. 518-534). Tirant lo Blanch.
Dieese (2021). Desigualdades sociais e econômicas se aprofundam. Boletim de Conjuntura, (29). https://www.dieese.org.br/boletimdeconjuntura/2021/boletimconjuntura29.pdf
Ehrenberg, A. (2010). O culto da performance: da aventura empreendedora à depressão nervosa. Ideias & Letras.
Fraser, N. (2017). From progressive neoliberalism to Trump'and beyond. American Affairs. 1(4), https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2017/11/progressive-neoliberalism-trump-beyond/
Guasque, B. & Guasque, A. (2020). A pandemia e o necessário e tempestivo retorno aos matizes keynesianos. Opinión Jurídica, 19(40), 259-276. https://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v19n40a13
Han, B. (2019). O que é poder? Vozes.
Han, B. C. (2017). The burnout society. Stanford University Press.
Ibge (2020). Síntese de indicadores sociais: uma análise das condições de vida da população brasileira. Coordenação de População e Indicadores Sociais. IBGE.
Kehl, M. R. (2020). Ressentimento (3ª ed). Boitempo.
Lama, J. P. de & Sanchez-Laulhe, J. (2020). Consideraciones a favor de un uso más amplio del término tecnopolíticas. Sobre la necesidad de la crítica y las políticas del conocimiento y las tecnologías. In J. Saberiego, A. J. do Amaral, E. B. C. Salles (orgs.). Algoritarismos (pp. 15-39). Tirant lo Blanch.
Lazzarato, M. (2014). Signs and machines: Capitalism and the production of subjectivity. Semiotext (e).
Markovits, D. (2019). The meritocracy trap: how America’s foundational myth feeds inequality, dismantles the middle class, and devours the elite. Penguin Press.
Mello, P. C. (2020). A máquina do ódio: notas de uma repórter sobre fake news e violência digital. Companhia das Letras.
Milanovic, B. (2012). Ter ou não ter: uma breve história da desigualdade. Bertrand.
Oxfam (2021). O vírus da desigualdade. Unindo um mundo dilacerado pelo coronaviÌrus por meio de uma economia justa, igualitária e sustentável. https://bit.ly/3MkK1rT
Pavón-cuéllar, D. (2014). Extimacy. In T. Teo (ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology (pp. 661-664). Springer.
Prost, A. (2009). Fronteiras e espaços do privado. In A. Prost, & G. Vincent (orgs.), D. Bottmann & D. de Bruchard (trads.), História da vida privada. Da Primeira Guerra a nossos dias (pp. 13-136). Companhia das Letras.
Rodotà , S. (2008). A vida na sociedade da vigilância: a privacidade hoje. Renovar.
Rouvroy, A. & Berns T. (2013). Algorithmic governmentality and prospects of emancipation. Réseaux, 177(1), 163-196. https://doi.org/10.3917/res.177.0163
Sampaio, J. A. L., Furbino, M. & Bocchino, L. A. (2021). Capitalismo de vigilância e tecnopolítica: os direitos fundamentais de privacidade e liberdade de expressão sob ataque. Opinión Jurídica, 20(42), 509-527. https://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v20n42a21
Sani, A. I. & Valquaresma, J. (2021). Cyberstalking: prevalência e estratégias de coping em estudantes portugueses do ensino secundário. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.8160
Sennett, R. (2014). O declínio do homem público: as tiranias da intimidade. Record.
Sibilia, P. (2013). La intimidad como espectáculo. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Sol, K. & Ankeren, M. V. (2011, 1st November). Willempje wil geen Facebookpagina. NRC. https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2011/11/02/willempje-wil-geen-facebookpagina-12042883-a1156031
Steinberg, S. B. (2017). Sharenting: Children’s Privacy in the Age of Social Media. Emory Law Journal, 66(4), 839-884. https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol66/iss4/2/
Sunstein, C. R. (2014). On rumors: How falsehoods spread, why we believe them, and what can be done. Princeton University Press.
Tisseron, S. (2001). L’intimité surexposée. Ramsay.
Tisseron, S. (2008). Virtuel, mon amour: penser, aimer, souffrir à l’ère des nouvelles technologies. Albin Michel.
Tisseron, S. (2011). Intimité et extimité. Communications, (88), 83-91. https://www.cairn.info/revuecommunications-2011-1-page-83.htm
Vincent, G. (2009). A dificuldade de escolha. In A. Prost, & G. Vincent (orgs.), D. Bottmann & D. de Bruchard (trads.), História da vida privada. Da Primeira Guerra a nossos dias (pp. 7-12). Companhia das Letras.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of Power. PublicAffair.