Digital Justice in the Contentious Administrative Jurisdiction: The Quickness Principle Based on ICTs as an Instrument for Judicial Decongestion in Colombia
Article Sidebar
You are free to:
Share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license.
Under the following terms:
Acknowledgment:
You must give proper credit , provide a link to the license , and indicate if any changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any manner that suggests that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Non-Commercial:
You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No Additional Restrictions:
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license allows.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for items of material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No guarantees are given. The license may not give you all the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper analyzes the application of the quickness principle and its effectiveness around modernity, referring to the use of information technologies in contentious administrative processes, thanks to the modification of law 1437 (2011) through law 2080 (2021). This reform of the Code of Administrative Procedure and Administrative Litigation (2011) carries out a significant development of the quickness principle through its different precepts, including portals, web, and technological systems. The ICTs use is a necessity due to the pandemic caused by Covid 19, which has rethought the rhythm of life of all citizens of the Nation and how administration justice. For this paper, we use a descriptive methodology to fulfill the proposed objective, which allows the analysis and description of the factors and premises to conclude, using secondary and tertiary sources, such as laws, scientific documents, research papers, and other documents complying with the above. In conclusion, the relation between the quickness principle and the ICT allows them to safeguard their rights and that there are no unjustified delays due to the parties’ lack of information tools or access quickly and safely. It is a positive change that does not present many discussions because it is a step toward the modernization of judicial processes in administrative matters, which is also obviously very open so that they can be carried out more efficiently by public servants and public servants'Entities, which will be adapted to the different situations that arise.
Article Details
References
Acevedo Rehbein, A. (2020, October 23rd). Balance of digital justice. Legal matters. https://www.asuntoslegales.com.co/analisis/alberto-acevedo-rehbein-400050/balance-de-la-justiciavirtual-3078329
Acosta, J. A. (2020, June 10th). Decree 806 of 2020: Technological Means in Legal Proceedings and Proceedings. Fonte. Law Firm. https://fonte.com.co/decreto-806-2020/
Aguilera-Martin, M., & Aponte-González, J. (2017). The extension of jurisprudence: constitutional supports, effects, and controversial aspects in its application. Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo, (18), 85-113. https://doi.org/10.18601/21452946.n18.06
Álvarez Casallas, L. (2010). Electronic Justice. Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo, (4), 43- 56. https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/Deradm/article/view/2767
Barrios Medina, J. A. (2015). El uso de las TICs en la justicia en Colombia. Letras jurídicas: revista de los investigadores del Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas U. V., (31), 15-28.
Cepeda Espinosa, M. J., & Otalora Lozano, G. (2020). Modernización de la administración de justicia a través de la inteligencia artificial. Fedesarrollo. http://hdl.handle.net/11445/3980
Colombian Association of System Engineers [ACIS]. (September 2020). Pros and cons of virtual justice. https://acis.org.co/portal/content/noticiasdeinteres/pros-y-contras-de-la-justicia-virtual
Congress of the Republic of Colombia. (1996, March 7th). Law 270. Statutory Law of Administration of Justice. Gaceta Oficial No. 42.745. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0270_1996.html
Congress of the Republic of Colombia. (1999, August 18th). Law 527. The access and use of data messages, electronic commerce, and digital signatures are defined and regulated, certification entities are established, and other provisions are issued. Gaceta Oficial No. 43.673. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0527_1999.html
Congress of the Republic of Colombia. (2011, January 18th). Law 1437. Code of Administrative Procedure and Administrative Litigation. Official Gazette No.47.956. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_1437_2011.html
Congress of the Republic of Colombia. (2012, July 12th). Law 1564. General Code of the Process. Gaceta Oficial No. 48.489. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_1564_2012.html
Congress of the Republic of Colombia. (2021, January 25th). Law 2080. The Code of Administrative Procedure and Administrative Litigation - Law 1437 of 2011 - is reformed, and other provisions are issued regarding decongestion in the processes processed before the jurisdiction. Gaceta Oficial No. 51.568. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_2080_2021.html
Constitutional Court. (1996, February 5th). Judgment C-037 (Vladimiro Naranjo Meza, M. P.). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1996/C-037-96.htm
Constitutional Court. (2011, March 24th). Judgment T-205 (Nilson Pinilla Pinilla, M. P.). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2011/T-205-11.htm
Constitutional Court. (2011, July 6th). Judgment C-534 (Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto, M. P.).
Council of State. (2021). The reform of the CPACA enters into force. https://www.consejodeestado.gov.co/news/entra-en-vigencia-reforma-al-cpaca/
Cordella, A., & Contini, F. (2020). Digital technologies to improve justice systems. A set of tools for action. Inter-American Development Bank [IDB]. https://publications.iadb.org/es/tecnologias-digitales-paramejorar-los-sistemas-de-justicia-un-conjunto-de-herramientas-para-la
Díaz, M. & Díaz, C. (2011). El empleado público ante el procedimiento administrativo. Deberes y obligaciones de buena administración. La Ley.
Gallo Callejas, M. A., Hernández Tirado, K., & Orozco Poveda, D. M. (2021). Análisis y retos de la justicia prospectiva. In K. Hernández Tirado, & D. M. Orozco Poveda, Reflexiones académicas alrededor del derecho (pp. 61-79). Editorial Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11912/8090
Gómez, V., & Riaño, A. S. (2020, October 22nd). El acceso a la administración de justicia en tiempos de pandemia: Un reto institucional. Prias Cadavid Abogados. https://www.priascadavid.com/?p=1204
Hernandez Tirado, K., & Orozco Poveda, D. M. (2018). Citizens monitoring process the framework of participatory democracy in Colombia. Revista Jurídica Derecho, 7(8), 71-89. http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2413-28102018000100005&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es
Ibáñez Parra, O., & Rincón Cárdenas, E. (2015). El acto administrativo electrónico y las nuevas tecnologías de la información. Revista Civilizar Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, 4(7), 1-36. http://hdl.handle.net/11232/257
Judicial Branch. (2020). Electronic File and sizing for digital judicial transformation. Superior Council of the Judiciary. https://www.ramajudicial.gov.co/documents/10228/35666503/INFORME+TRANSFORMACI%C3%92N+DIGITAL+RAMA+JUDICIAL..PDF/53701101-e30c-466b-841a-98faf9fce8e9
Justice. (2020, March 19th). Each year, 20% of court cases are dammed and add congestion. El Tiempo. https://www.eltiempo.com/justicia/cortes/cifras-motivos-y-posibles-soluciones-a-la-congestion-judicialen-colombia-474588
Mesa González, V. (2021). Los actos de comunicación en el Decreto 806 de 2020. Aspectos problemáticos de la notificación personal en un sistema digital colombiano [undergraduate Thesis, University of Antioquia]. Institutional Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/10495/21565
National Constituent Assembly. (1991, July 20th). Constitución Política de Colombia. Gaceta Constitucional No. 116. https://bit.ly/3kPmJPO
Nevado-Batalla Moreno, P. T. (2010). Principios y estructura general del procedimiento administrativo. In J. González Ballesteros, F. Castro Abella, & M. d. Muñoz Amor (cords.), Procedimiento administrativo local (pp. 547-590). El Consultor de los Ayuntamientos y de los Juzgados; La Ley.
Office of the Overseer of Spain. (2018, February 09th). Dilaciones en concesión de licencia Acomodar la actuación administrativa a los principios de eficacia, economía y celeridad. https://www.defensordelpueblo.es/resoluciones/obligacion-de-acomodar-la-actuacion-administrativa-a-los-principios-de-eficaciaeconomia-y-celeridad-7/
Ortega Rivero, R. (2010). Principio de celeridad. In J. A. Santamaría Pastor (dir.), Los principios jurídicos del derecho administrativo (pp. 981-1000). La Ley.
Presidency of the Republic of Colombia. (2012, November 22nd). Decree 2364. Using which article 7 of Law 527 of 1999 is regulated, the electronic signature and other provisions are issued. Gaceta Oficial No. 48622. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=50583
Presidency of the Republic. (2020, June 04th). Legislative Decree 806. Measures are adopted to implement information and communication technologies in judicial proceedings, streamline judicial processes, and make the attention to users of the justice service more flexible. Gaceta Oficial No. 51.335. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=127580
Quintero Chinchilla, L. C. (2016). La aplicación de los principios de celeridad y debido proceso en los procesos de cobro coactivo en Colombia: un análisis desde su naturaleza y la normatividad vigente. 2006-2015 [Master’s Thesis, University Colegio Mayor de Nuestra Señora del Rosario]. Institutional Repository. https://doi.org/10.48713/10336_12512
Quiroz Monsalvo, A. W. (2020). Justicia digital: bases para planear por escenarios a partir del CGP. Supreme Court of Justice of Colombia. https://cortesuprema.gov.co/corte/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Justicia-digital-I-P.-AQM-27-abr_compressed.pdf
Reyes Espinosa, L. A. (2020, December 3rd). Alcances y retos de la actualización al CPACA mediante la Ley 2080 de 2021 [undergraduate Thesis, Santo Tomas University]. Institutional Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/11634/38638
Superior Council of the Judiciary. (2006, March 02nd). Agreement No. PSAA06-3334. Electronic and computerized means are regulated to fulfill the justice administration functions. https://normograma.info/crc/docs/pdf/acuerdo_csjudicatura_3334_2006.pdf
Superior Council of the Judiciary. (2020, September 22nd). Agreement PCSJA20-11631. The Strategic Plan for Digital Transformation of the Judicial Branch PETD 2021-2025 is adopted. https://actosadministrativos.ramajudicial.gov.co/GetFile.ashx?url=%7e%2fApp_Data%2fUpload%2fPCSJA20-11631.pdf
Supreme Court of Justice. Civil Cassation Chamber. (2020, June 4th). Judgment STC3610 (Luis Armando Tolosa Villabona, M. P.). https://www.cortesuprema.gov.co/corte/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/11001-22-03-000-2020-00548-01-FALLO.pdf
Supreme Court of Justice. Civil Cassation Chamber. (2020, September 11th). Judgment STC7284 (Octavio Augusto Tejeiro Duque, M. P.). https://cortesuprema.gov.co/corte/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/STC7284-2020.pdf
Surfshark. (2020, August 23rd). Digital Quality of Life Index 2020. https://surfshark.com/dql2020
Véscovi, E. (1984). Teoría general del proceso. Temis.