Minority Report: the Road to a Deterministic Theory for the Philosophy of Criminal Law
Article Sidebar
You are free to:
Share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license.
Under the following terms:
Acknowledgment:
You must give proper credit , provide a link to the license , and indicate if any changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any manner that suggests that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Non-Commercial:
You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No Additional Restrictions:
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license allows.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for items of material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No guarantees are given. The license may not give you all the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this article we start from the analysis of the film Minority Report (Steven Spielberg, 2002) in order to study the consequences of the use of Artificial Intelligence as a crime prevention tool. We explore the ethical issues of these technologies as accessories - and protagonists - of contemporary law and raise the challenges for criminal law theory in the face of a possible total prevention of crime. Finally, we conclude with the prospects that these changes may have for governments, their justice administration policies and power relations in the near future of 'algorithmic republics'.
Article Details
References
Aguilar, S. (2020). La genealogía y la crítica: de Michel Foucault a Enrique Marí. Derechos en Acción, 15(15), 409-409. https://doi.org/10.24215/25251678e409
Andronico, A. (2021). Digital justice and forms of life. Teoria e Critica della regolazione sociale. https://www.mimesisjournals.com/ojs/index.php/tcrs/article/view/1466
Bentham, J. (1995). The Panopticon Writings. Verso.
Bentham, J. (2000). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Batoche Books.
Böhm, M. L. (2016). Justicia preventiva. Revista penal, (37), 46-60. https://www.academia.edu/download/47335590/Bohm_Justicia_preventiva_Rev_Penal_27_sept_2015.pdf
Cancio Fernández, R. (2020). ¿Sueñan los jueces con sentencias electrónicas? Análisis Jurídico-Político, 2(3), 145-168. https://doi.org/10.22490/26655489.3854
Cárdenas Krenz, R. (2021). ¿Jueces robots? Inteligencia artificial y derecho. Revista Justicia & Derecho, 4(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.32457/rjyd.v4i2.1345
Collins, H., & Pinch, T. (1993). The Golem. What everybody should know about science. Cambridge University Press.
Camacho, D., Luzón, M. V., & Cambria, E. (2021). New research methods & algorithms in social network analysis. Future Generation Computer Systems, 114, 290-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.08.006
Corvalán, J. G. (2018). Inteligencia artificial: retos, desafíos y oportunidades-Prometea: la primera inteligencia artificial de Latinoamérica al servicio de la Justicia. Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, 5(1), 295-316. https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v5i1.55334
Dick, P. K. (2002). The minority report. Pantheon Books.
Echeverría, J. (2019). Conferencias Aranguren ¿Fin de la intimidad? Ensimismarnos: contra las amenazas transhumanistas. Isegoría, (60), 15-50. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2019.060.02
Elbert, L. (2000). El gabinete del Dr. Frankenstein. La ciencia y los científicos vistos por el cine. Editorial Fin de Siglo y Facultad de Ciencias (Udelar).
Falzón, C. (2005). La filosofía va al cine. Una introducción a la filosofía. Tecnos.
Foucault, M (1995). Discipline and punish: the birth of prison. Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1996). La verdad y las formas jurídicas. Gedisa
Gazzollo, T. (2019). Minority Report e il crimine senza crimine. Jus (3), 224-251.
Kleinberg, J., Ludwig, J., Mullainathan, S., & Sunstein, C. R. (2018). Discrimination in the Age of Algorithms. Journal of Legal Analysis, 10, 113-174. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laz001
Kostenwein, E. R. (2021). El castigo, esa otra bestia magnífica. Astrea.
Kreso, I., Kapo, A., & Turulja, L. (2021). Data mining privacy preserving: Research agenda. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews, 11(1), e1392. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1392
Ibarra, E. (2017). Estado, violencia y anarquismo. Bajo Palabra. Revista de Filosofía, 15, 99-116. https://doi.org/10.15366/bp2017.15.008
Lagua, W. M., Bejeguen, K. P., & Vargas, C. M. C. (2021). Marketing de proximidad: La geolocalización, como estrategia de publicidad en las marcas de centros comerciales en la ciudad de Ambato. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 6(2), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2021.2.487
Lin, L., & Hou, Z. (2020). Combat COVID-19 with artificial intelligence and big data. Journal of Travel Medicine, 27(5), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaa080
Martínez García, J. I. (2018). Derecho inteligente || Smart Law. Cuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho, (37), 95-114. https://doi.org/10.7203/CEFD.37.11440
Mira Mira. J. (2008). Aspectos conceptuales de la Inteligencia Artificial y la Ingeniería del Conocimiento. In J. T. Palma Mendez. & R. Marín Morales (coords.) Inteligencia Artificial: Métodos, técnicas y aplicaciones (pp. 3-30). McGraw-Hill.
Miró Llinares, F. (2018). Inteligencia artificial y Justicia Penal: Más allá de los resultados lesivos causados por robots. Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminología, (20), 87-130. https://doi.org/10.5944/rdpc.20.2018.26446
Salvi, N. (2020). El utilitarismo como ética configurable en la inteligencia artificial. In G. H. Hartmann, S. Reimann Patz & T. Covatti Piaia (orgs.) Anais do I Simpósio de Inteligência Artificial, Proteção de Dados e Cidadania (pp. 89-98). Universidade Regional Integrada do Alto Uruguai e das Missões.
Santy, C., & Soelistyo, L. (2014). The Panoptic Sibyl System and the Dystopia in Gen Urobuchi’s Psycho Pass. Kata Kita, 2(1). https://katakita.petra.ac.id/index.php/sastra-inggris/article/view/2996
Stănilă, L. M. (2020) Minority Report: AI Criminal Investigations. In G. Ilik & A. Stanojoska (eds.) International Scientific Conference 'Towards a Better Future: Human Rights, Organized Crime and Digital Society' (pp. 142-154). Faculty of Law - Kicevo, University 'St. Kliment Ohridski' - Bitola Center for Scientific Research at the Faculty of Law - Kicevo.
Quian Quiroga, R. (2018). Neurocienciaficción. Cómo el cine se adelantó a la ciencia. Sudamericana.
Van Natta, M., Chen, P., Herbek, S., Jain, R., Kastelic, N., Katz, E., Struble, M., Vanam, V. & Vattikonda, N. (2020). The rise and regulation of thermal facial recognition technology during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 7(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa038
Velázquez, H. J. F. (2021). Esclareciendo el concepto de lógica deóntica. Andamios, 18(45), 457-485. https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v18i45.826
Valencia Grajales, J. F., & Marin Galeano, M. S. (2017). El panóptico más allá de vigilar y castigar. Revista Kavilando, 9(2), 511-529. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-63753-2
Velo Dalbrenta, D. (2013). Del diritto penale come esperienza. Tre studi inattuali. Cleup.
Velo Dalbrenta, D. (2019). Criminalità come destino?: Philip K. Dick e lo straniante mondo di Minority Report. Teoria e Critica della regolazione sociale, 1(18), 153-173. https://mimesisjournals.com/ojs/index.php/tcrs/article/view/57
Zavadivker, Nicolás. (2011). La ética y los límites de la argumentación moral: el desafío del emotivismo. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras UNT.
Završnik, A. (2021). Algorithmic justice: Algorithms and big data in criminal justice settings. European Journal of criminology, 18(5), 623-642. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370819876762