The Problem of Political Obligation and the Principle of Fair Play: A Critical Assessment
Article Sidebar
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
You are free to:
Share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license.
Under the following terms:
Acknowledgment:
You must give proper credit , provide a link to the license , and indicate if any changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any manner that suggests that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Non-Commercial:
You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No Additional Restrictions:
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license allows.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for items of material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No guarantees are given. The license may not give you all the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Main Article Content
Abstract
There are different theories that try to give a satisfactory answer to the question of why people should obey the law. One of these proposals is the principle of fair play (or fairness). It says that if a person, who is part of a social cooperation scheme, benefits from the efforts of the other participants he/she is bound to do his part; otherwise, he/she acts unfairly. Several scholars have recognized the value of the principle, but others have demonstrated with good arguments that it has many difficulties to justify a general duty of obedience in complex schemes such as the State. The main objective of the paper is to assess, by using the literature review method, the virtues and weaknesses of the principle of fair play as a theory of political obligation. The obtained conclusion is that this theory could be an appropriate proposal as long as it satisfies some requirements.
Article Details
References
Bayón Mohíno, J. C. (1991). La normatividad del derecho: deber jurídico y razones para la acción. Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
Becker, L. (1986). Reciprocity. Routledge.
Brandt, R. B. (1964). The Concepts of Obligation and Duty. Mind, 73(291), 374-393.
Dagger, R. (1997). Civic Virtues: Rights, Citizenship, and Republican Liberalism. Oxford University Press.
Dworkin, R. (2005). El imperio de la justicia. Gedisa.
Dworkin, R. (2011). Justice for Hedgehogs. Harvard University Press.
Gilbert, M. (2006). A Theory of Political Obligation: Membership, Commitment, and the Bonds of Society. Oxford University Press.
Hart, H. L. A. (1955). Are There Any Natural Rights? Philosophical Review, 64(2), 175-191.
Hart, H. L. A. (1977). Obligación jurídica y obligación moral, Cuadernos de Crítica, 3, 5-33.
Hecht (2011). Fair Play: Resolving the Crito-Apology Problem, History of Political Thought, 32(4), 543-564.
Horton, J. P. (2010). Political Obligation. Pelgrave Macmillan.
Johnson, K. (1974). Perspectives on Political Obligation: A Critique and a Proposal, The Western Political Quarterly, 27(3), 520-535.
Johnson, K. (1975). Political Obligation and the Voluntary Association Model of the State, Ethics, 86(1), 17-29.
Klosko, G. (1999). Presumptive Benefit, Fairness, and Political Obligation. En W. A. Edmundson (Ed.), The Duty to Obey the Law (pp. 193-212). Rowman & Littlefield.
Klosko, G. (2004a). The Principle of Fairness and Political Obligation. Rowman & Littlefield.
Klosko, G. (2004b). Multiple Principles of Political Obligation, Political Theory, 32(6), 801-824.
Klosko, G. (2005). Political Obligations. University Press.
Klosko, G. (2019). Why Should We Obey the Law? Polity Press.
Knowles, D. (2010). Political Obligation. A critical introduction. Routledge.
McDermott, D. (2004). Fair-Play Obligations, Political Studies, 52, 216-232. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00476.x.
Moauro, L. (2011). A Critical Assessment of George Klosko‘s Version of the Principle of Fair Play, Stance, 4, 61-68. https://openjournals.bsu.edu/stance/article/view/1785.
Nozick, R. (1991). Anarquía, Estado y Utopía. F.C.E.
Platón (2010). Critón. Traducción de C. Eggers Lan. Eudeba.
Polin, R. (1971). L’obligation politique. Presses Universitaires de France.
Raphael, D. D. (1970). Problems of Political Philosophy. Praeger Publishers.
Rawls, J. (1999a). Justice as Fairness. En S. Freeman (Ed.), Collected Papers (pp. 47-72). Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999b). The Sense of Justice. En S. Freeman (Ed.), Collected Papers (pp. 96-116). Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999c). Legal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play. En S. Freeman (Ed.), Collected Papers (pp. 117-129). Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (2006). Teoría de la Justicia. FCE.
Raz, J. (1982). La Autoridad del Derecho. Ensayos sobre Moral y Derecho. UNAM.
Raz, J. (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Clarendon Press.
Roemer, A. (1994). Introducción al análisis económico del derecho. FCE.
Sartorius, R. (1999). Political Authority and Political Obligation. En W. A. Edmundson (Ed.), The Duty to Obey the Law (pp. 143-157). Rowman & Littlefield.
Simmons, J. A. (1979a). Moral Principles and Political Obligations. University Press.
Simmons, J. A. (1979b). The Principle of Fair Play, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 8(4), 307-337.
Simmons, J. A. (1987). The Anarchist Position: A Reply to Klosko and Senor, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 16(3), 269-279.
Simmons, J. A. (2001). 'Fair Play and Political Obligation: Twenty Years Later'. En Justification and Legitimacy: Essays on Rights and Obligations (pp. 27-42). University Press.
Singer, P. (1985). Democracia y desobediencia. Ariel.
Smith, M. B. E. (1999). Is There a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law? En W. A. Edmundson (Ed.), The Duty to Obey the Law (pp. 193-212). Rowman & Littlefield.
Tale, C. (2004). El valor de la ley positiva, Opinión jurídica, 3(5), 87-102. https://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/opinion/article/view/1326/1316
Vlastos, G. (1995). Socrates and Political Obedience and Disobedience. En D. W. Graham (Ed.), Gregory Vlastos. Studies in Greek Philosophy. Socrates, Plato, and Their Tradition, vol. 2 (pp. 30-42). Princeton University Press.