The Judicial Decision and the Act of Judging, A Reflection from Paul Ricoeur’s Philosophy
Article Sidebar
You are free to:
Share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license.
Under the following terms:
Acknowledgment:
You must give proper credit , provide a link to the license , and indicate if any changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any manner that suggests that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Non-Commercial:
You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No Additional Restrictions:
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license allows.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for items of material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No guarantees are given. The license may not give you all the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article has as its main objective to reflect on the judicial decision, specifically on the phenomenon of legitimacy in the act of judging and how from this we can place ourselves in a hermeneutic of the judicial text. The methodology used was based on an analytical theoretical method, which consists of a decomposition of a whole, individualizing each part or element of the study phenomenon. The main conclusion to which the text leads is that the legitimacy of the trial is not merely in an act of power, but is erected from the acceptance of the instrument that condenses the decision by the subjects who were immersed in the Litis, that is why the judge seeks to persuade the procedural subjects immersed in the conflict and thus legitimize their judgment or sentence. Now, the act of judging must also be seen as that phenomenon that serves as an instrument of understanding the yes and the other, and in this way can immerse us to a deeper level which lies in a hermeneutic of the judicial text.
Article Details
References
Agudelo, M. (2007). El proceso jurisdiccional. Comlibros.
Alexy, R. (2007). Teoría de la argumentación jurídica: la teoría del discurso racional como teoría de la fundamentación jurídica. Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
Bodenheimer, E. (1994). Teoría del derecho (V. Herrero, trad.). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Betti, E. (2015). Teoría de la interpretación jurídica (A. Vergara, trad.). CIP-Pontificia Universidad de Chile.
Bobbio, N. y Bovero, M. (1985). Origen y fundamentos del poder político. Grijalbo. S.A
Byung-Chul, H. (2016). Sobre el poder. Herder Editorial.
Canetti, E. (2009). Masa y poder. Penguin Random House.
Devis, H. (1963). Compendio de derecho procesal civil parte general. Temis.
Dworkin, R. (1992). El imperio de la justicia (C. Ferrari, trad.). Gedisa Editorial.
Ferraris, M. (2000). Historia de la hermenéutica. Akal Ediciones.
Grondin, J. (2008). ¿Qué es la hermenéutica? Herder Editorial.
Nava, S. (2010). La sentencia como palabra e instrumento de comunicación. Revista Justicia Electoral, 1(6), 45-76. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4062157
Kelsen, H. (1988). Teoría General del Derecho y del Estado. Universidad Autónoma de México.
Kelsen, H. (2009). Teoría pura del derecho. Editorial Porrúa.
Picontó, T. (2005). Hermenéutica, argumentación y justicia en Paul Ricoeur. Dykinson.
Quintero, B. (2000). Teoría general del proceso. Editorial Temis S.A.
Radbruch, G. (2014). Introducción a la filosofía del derecho (W. Roces, trad.). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Ricoeur, P (1986). Du texte à l’action. Essais d’herméneutique, II. Éditions du Seuil.
Ricoeur, P. (1993). Amor y justicia. Caparrós.
Ricoeur, P. (1997). Lo justo (C. Gardini, trad.). Editorial Jurídica de Chile.
Ricoeur, P. (2002). Del texto a la acción. Ensayos de hermenéutica II (P. Corona, trad.). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Ricoeur, P. (2008). Lo justo 2. Trotta.
Taruffo, M. (2006). Sobre las fronteras, escritos sobre la justicia civil (B. Quintero, trad.). Editorial Temis S.A.
Weber, M. (2005). Economía y sociedad. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Zaccaria, G. (1999). Explicar y comprender. En torno a la filosofía del derecho de Paul Ricoeur. Doxa, 22, 631-641. https://doi.org/10.14198/DOXA1999.22.26
Zuluaga, A. y Zuluaga, S. (2018). Funciones de la ideología en la hermenéutica constitucional. Una mirada desde la filosofía de Paul Ricoeur. Opinión Jurídica, 17(33), 255-276. https://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v17n33a11
Zuluaga, A. (2020). Hermenéutica del texto judicial: Una construcción desde Ricoeur. Tópicos, Revista De Filosofía, (58), 157-188. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i58.1076