Pension Subsidized Regime: Medellín Case in the period 1996-2008
Main Article Content
Abstract
The object of this research article is to analyze the efficacy of universality principle in the pension subsidized regime for the case of Medellin during the years 1996- 2008. In one hand, it presents a theoretical reflection on universality as a social
security principle; on the other hand, it presents the limitations that from a juridical point of view could be evidences in the pension subsidized regime. So from the analysis of data ad documentary sources, it was possible to conclude that pension subsidized regime is not an efficient tool for urban, rural independent workers, community mothers and disabled people could have access to a pension. In this way, it has been proposed as a challenge for social security policy, to increase the coverage of pension subsidize system in order to allow to large group of independent workers that wen they arrive to their retired age, has disability, or die can have an income allowing their subsistence and their families as well
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
You are free to:
Share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license.
Under the following terms:
Acknowledgment:
You must give proper credit , provide a link to the license , and indicate if any changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any manner that suggests that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Non-Commercial:
You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No Additional Restrictions:
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license allows.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for items of material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No guarantees are given. The license may not give you all the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.