Rights Despite the Holder: the Case of Imprisoned People in Hunger Strike Submitted to Forced Feeding
Article Sidebar
You are free to:
Share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license.
Under the following terms:
Acknowledgment:
You must give proper credit , provide a link to the license , and indicate if any changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any manner that suggests that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Non-Commercial:
You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No Additional Restrictions:
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license allows.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for items of material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No guarantees are given. The license may not give you all the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims to analyze the collision that exists between the right to protest by persons deprived of liberty and the limitation in its exercise through the actions undertaken by the prison authorities, who are in the position of guarantor by part of the State towards persons deprived of liberty, so that it is proposed to characterize, from the constitutional model of fundamental rights, the two dimensions, one subjective and the other objective, based on the jurisprudence of the Spanish Constitutional Court from the perspective of their protection. in ownership, that is, rights with the owner, without the owner and despite the owner; rights despite the headline is the proposed category to delve into, insofar as this is articulated with the objective and subjective dimension of rights that apply in the specific case of persons deprived of their liberty who undergo hunger strikes, but are forced by the State to feed itself in order to avoid starvation, it is concluded that the limitation in the ownership of fundamental rights towards persons deprived of liberty directly affects the conditioning of their effective enjoyment; It should be noted that this jurisprudential thesis has been assumed by constitutional courts, as well as the Colombian case in the position of guarantor as a mechanism that empowers the State to interrupt the hunger strike of those deprived of liberty when their lives are in imminent risk.
Article Details
References
Barranco, M. (2001). El concepto republicano de libertad y el modelo constitucional de derechos fundamentales. Anuario de filosofía del derecho, 18, 205-226.
Böckenförde, E.-W. (1993). Escritos sobre derechos fundamentales (J. L. Requejo e I. Villaverde, trads.). Nomos.
Cervelló Donderis, V. (1996). La huelga de hambre penitenciaria: fundamento y límites de la alimentación forzosa. Estudios Penales y Criminológicos, (19), 53-164.
Corte Constitucional De Colombia. (2012, 3 de mayo). Sentencia T-328 (María Victoria Calle Correa, M. P.). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2012/t-328-12.htm
Corte Suprema de Justicia. (2006, 27 de julio). Sentencia 25536 (Álvaro Orlando Pérez Pinzón, M.P.). https://bit.ly/3mDtNxD
Criado, J. (2011). Huelga de hambre y alimentación forzosa. Revista Derecho y salud, 21 (extraordinario), 125-139. https://www.ajs.es/es/index-revista-derecho-y-salud/volumen-21-extraordinario-2011/huelga-hambre-y-alimentacion-forzosa
Faundes, J. J. y Díaz, L. I. (2014). Examen de proporcionalidad de la huelga de hambre de personas privadas de libertad y de su alimentación forzada a la luz de la jurisprudencia. Estudios constitucionales, 12(2), 137-186. http://www.estudiosconstitucionales.cl/index.php/econstitucionales/article/view/23
Gómez, G. (2005). Derechos fundamentales y recurso de protección. Ediciones UDP.
Jefatura del Estado de España. (1979, 26 de septiembre). Ley Orgánica 1/1979, General Penitenciaria. Boletín Oficial del Estado n.° 239. https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/1979/BOE-A-1979-23708-consolidado.pdf
Kaufmann, A. (1959). Die Dogmatik der Unterlassungsdelikte. Schwartz.
Lasagabáster Herrarte, I. (1994). Las relaciones de sujeción especial. Civitas.
Poder Judicial de España (1990, 5 de enero). Providencia (Juzgado de Vigilancia Penitenciaria número 2 de Madrid).
Pretch, J. y Faundes, J. (2013). Legitimidad de la huelga de hambre. un debate sobre el derecho a la vida y la dignidad humana. Estudios constitucionales, 11(2), 333-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002013000200009
Reino de España. (1978, 27 de diciembre). Constitución Española. Boletín Oficial del Estado n.° 311.https://www.senado.es/web/conocersenado/normas/constitucion/index.html
Tole, J. (2006). La teoría de la doble dimensión de los derechos fundamentales en Colombia. El estado de cosas inconstitucionales, un ejemplo de su aplicación. Cuestiones Constitucionales, (15), 253-316. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/cconst/n15/1405-9193-cconst-15-253.pdf
Tribunal Constitucional de España. (1981, 14 de julio). Sentencia 25/81 (Antonio Truyol Serra, M. P.). https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/es-ES/Resolucion/Show/25
Tribunal Constitucional de España. (1985, 15 de abril). Sentencia 53/85 (Gloria Begué Cantón y Rafael Gómez-Ferrer Morant, M. P.). https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-T-1985-9096
Tribunal Constitucional de España. (1987, 21 de enero). Sentencia 2/87, (Miguel Rodríguez-Piñero y Bravo-Ferrer, M. P.). http://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/es-ES/Resolucion/Show/734
Tribunal Constitucional de España. (1990, 29 de marzo). Sentencia 61/90 (Carlos de la Vega Benayas, M. P.). http://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/es-ES/Resolucion/Show/1486
Tribunal Constitucional de España. (1990, 27 de junio). Sentencia 120/90 (Fernando García-Mon y González-Regueral, Eugenio Díaz Eimil y José Vicente Gimeno Sendra, M. P.). http://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/es-ES/Resolucion/Show/1545
Tribunal Constitucional de España. (1990, 19 de julio). Sentencia 137/90, Francisco Tomás y Valiente, https://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/es-ES/Resolucion/Show/1562.