Internal Coherence and Theoretical Syncretism in the Mexican Constitutional Bases
Main Article Content
Abstract
In current legal theory the constitutional context is the platform for assuring rights and freedoms; however, the Mexican Constitution foresees assumptions that are mutually exclusive. This circumstance implies the prescription of a right at the Constitutional level and also a non-right; consequently, this results in a methodological syncretism. In addition to denounce such a contradiction, this article is intended to defend the premise that the Constitution requires internal coherence. Such an idea is grounded on the equality principle and the judicial interpretation as an attempt for adjusting theoretical coherence to the constitutional norms.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
You are free to:
Share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license.
Under the following terms:
Acknowledgment:
You must give proper credit , provide a link to the license , and indicate if any changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any manner that suggests that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Non-Commercial:
You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No Additional Restrictions:
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license allows.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for items of material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No guarantees are given. The license may not give you all the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.